Skip to main content

The Emergence of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement

  • Chapter
Contentious Politics in the Middle East

Part of the book series: Middle East Today ((MIET))

  • 542 Accesses

Abstract

Boycott is not a new tactic used in the Palestinian struggle—it was widely used in the uprising against British colonial rule in the 1930s and popularly deployed throughout Palestinian society during the first intifada. However, the emergence of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement in its current form can be found in a range of processes from the year 2000 onward. By using a contentious politics framework, and specifically utilizing analytical concepts of social movement theory, such as political opportunities and constraints, mobilizing dynamics, and collective action frames, this chapter aims to unpack the emergence of the BDS movement from 2000 to 2005.1 During this time boycott developed as a tactical repertoire for organization and a global movement centered on boycott, divestment, and sanctions started to emerge. In this chapter, I argue that a range of factors led to the rise of the BDS movement and thus created a foundation from which the movement could be built.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For an overview of causal factors that can contribute to social movement emergence, see D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, and M. Zald, eds., Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996),

    Google Scholar 

  2. and McAdam, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly, Dynamics of Contention (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Tilly, From Mobilization to Revolution (New York: Random House, 1978);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doug McAdam, Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tarrow, Struggling to Reform: Social Movements and Policy Change during Cycles of Protest (Ithaca, NY: Center for International Studies, Cornell University, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. and Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965–1975 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Pearlman, Violence, Nonviolence, and the Palestinian National Movement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 126, Ebook; Accessed at: http://ebooks.cambridge.org.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Hilal, “The Polarization of the Palestinian Political Field,” journal of Palestine Studies 39, no.3 (Spring 2010), 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seventh Arab League Summit Conference, “Resolution on Palestine,” Rabat, Morocco October 28, 1974; Accessed at: http://unispal.un.org.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amnesty International, “Israel and the Occupied Territories: The Issue of Settlements must Be Addressed According to International Law,” Amnesty International AI Index: MDE 15/085/2003 (September 8, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Jamjoum, “The Global Campaign for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions against Israel,” in Nonviolent Resistance in the Second Intifada, ed. M. Carter Hallward and J. Norman (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 138.

    Google Scholar 

  12. UNGA, A/ES-10/242, “Letter dated 15 October 2003 from the Permanent Representative of the Syrian Arab Republic to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the General Assembly,” October 15, 2003; A/ES-10/243, “Letter dated 15 October 2003 from the Permanent Representative of Malaysia to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the General Assembly,” October 15, 2003; A/ES–10/244, “Letter dated 16 October 2003 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the General Assembly,” October 20, 2003; all accessed at http://unispal.un.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  13. UNGA, A/ES-10/248, “Report of the Secretary-General Prepared Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution ES-10/13,” November 24, 2003, 5; Accessed at: http://unis-pal.un.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  14. UNGA, Resolution ES-10/14, “Illegal Israeli Actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the Rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory,” December 8, 2003, 3; Accessed at: http://unispal.un.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  15. UNGA, Press Release GA/10216, “General Assembly Adopts Text Requesting International Court of Justice to Issue Advisory Opinion on West Bank Separation Wall,” December 8, 2003; Accessed at: http://unispal.un.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ICJ, Reports 2004, Advisory Opinion, “Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory,” July 9, 2004,184 paragraph 120; Accessed at: http://www.icj-cij.org.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Madjdal Editorial Team, “The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Wall: An Alternative Road Map,” al-Majdal (Autumn 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Tarrow, Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 123.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Abdel-Shafi, H. Ashrawi, M. Barghouti et al. “Urgent Call to World Civil Society: Break the Conspiracy of Silence, Act Before It Is too Late,” March 29, 2002;

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Boyle, “The Al Aqsa Intifada and International Law” (Lecture given at Illinois State University, Bloomington-Normal Illinois November 30, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Davidson, “On Divestment” (Paper presented at Resisting Israeli Apartheid: Strategies and Principles Conference, SOAS London, 5 December 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ecumenical Advocacy Group, “Economic Pressure as a Tool for Establishing a Just Peace in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict” (Spring 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Rose and S. Rose, “More Pressure for Mid-East Peace,” The Guardian, April 6, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hilary Rose and Steven Rose, “Why we Launched the Boycott of Israeli Institutions,” The Guardian, July 15, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Reinhart, “Academic Boycott: In Support of Paris IV,” Borderlands e-journal2, no.3 (2003). Accessed at: http://www.borderlands.net.au.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Docker and G. Hage, “Call for An Australian Boycott of Research and Cultural Links with Israel,” Borderlands e-journal 2, no.3 (2003). Accessed at: http://www.border-lands.net.au;

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Docker, “Settler Colonialism as Genocide: Implications for a Strategy of Solidarity with the Palestinians” (Paper presented at Resisting Israeli Apartheid: Strategies and Principles Conference, SOAS London, December 5, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  28. AUT, “Israel Universities: Statement by AUT Secretary General Sally Hunt,” April 22, 2005; Accessed at: http://www.ucu.org.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Taylor, “Storm Blows Union off Course,” The Guardian, May 31, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Gerstenfeld, “The Academic Boycott against Israel,” Jewish Political Studies Review 15 (Fall 2003). Accessed at: http://jcpa.org.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. de Rooij, “London Conference, a Prelude to Academic Boycott of Israel,” Washington Report on Middle East Affairs January/February 2005, 15; Accessed at: http://www.wrmea.org.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Goodwin and James Jasper, “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory,” Sociological Forum 14, no. 1 (1999): 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. D. Snow and Robert Benford, “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest,” in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory ed. Aldon Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992), 136.

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Goffman, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Snow and Benford, “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization,” International Social Movement Research (1999): 198.

    Google Scholar 

  36. BDS Movement, “Palestinian Civil Society Call for BDS,” July 9, 2005. Accessed at: http://www.bdsmovement.net.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Fawaz A. Gerges

Copyright information

© 2015 Fawaz A. Gerges

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morrison, S. (2015). The Emergence of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement. In: Gerges, F.A. (eds) Contentious Politics in the Middle East. Middle East Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530868_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics