Skip to main content

Abstract

Thanks to the American Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL), its members and sponsors, I had the privilege of serving as the 2014 National Language Teacher of the Year. During that year, I not only had the privilege of representing language educators nationwide, but was also able to meet personally many passionate language educators who teach in the rapidly changing environment of the high school classroom. My year of service provided me with opportunities to observe language classrooms around the country as well as meet and discuss current trends and issues that impact language education with students, teachers, school administrators, and leaders in language education, as well as local and national legislators. The shift to language proficiency makes it an exciting time to be a language teacher, but the lack of federal, state, and community support, financial or moral, for the classroom teacher impedes the retooling of educators and the redesign of outdated and ineffectual curriculum. The increasing global economy and overwhelming data in support of early language education has finally begun to change the traditional high school language sequence across the American landscape. The following is an overview of current high school language programs, exciting twenty-first-century trends, and the challenges that we, as language educators, face in order to embrace the new paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2013). The Keys to Planning for Learning: Effective Curriculum, Unit, and Lesson Design. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtain, H. and Dahlberg, C.A. (2010). Languages and Children: Making the Match (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2000). Grammar Correction in ESL/EFL Writing Classes May Not be Effective. Beijing, China: Beijing Language and Culture University. Personal communication from Ronald Gray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsasser, R.C. (1993). A tale of two technical cultures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(4), 373–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsasser, R.C. and Savignon, S.J. (1991). Linguistics, language pedagogy, and teachers’ technical cultures. In J.E. Alatis (Ed.): Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1991. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1998). Teaching grammar: Why bother? California English, 3(3), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCSSFL (National Council of State Supervisors for Languages). (2010). NCSSFL State and Question Matrix Report. Retrieved from http://www.ncssfl.org/reports2/state_question_matrix.php on April 28, 2015.

  • O’Donnell Wicklund Pigozzi and Peterson, Architects Inc., VS Furniture, and Bruce Mau Design (2010). The Third Teacher: 79 Ways You Can Use Design to Transform Teaching and Learning. New York: Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills — Retrieved from hhttp://www.p21.org/index.php.

  • Rhodes, N.C. and Pufahl, I. (2010). Foreign Language Teaching in US Schools: Results of a National Survey. Santillana, USA: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorton, D. and Altschuler, G. (2012) America’s foreign language deficit. Forbes. Retrieved from http://onforb.es/PUQqtw.

  • Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Digest of Education Statistics, 2002, NCES 2003–060. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2015). U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan Calls for Strong Education Law That Protects All Students, Ensures High-Quality Preschool, Supports Bold State and Local Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-education-secretary-arne-duncan-calls-strong-education-law-protects-all-students-ensures-high-quality-preschool-supports-bold-state-and-local-innovation on April 28, 2015.

  • Yonezawa, S., Wells, A.S., and Serna, I. (2002). Choosing tracks: ‘freedom of choice’ in detracking schools. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 37–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Linda Egnatz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Egnatz, L. (2016). The High School Challenge. In: Berbeco, S. (eds) Foreign Language Education in America. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137528506_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137528506_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56106-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52850-6

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics