Skip to main content

Abstract

Port functions including container ports have been dramatically developing since the inception of container transportation. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (1994), Van den Berg and Van Klink (1995), and Van Klink (1995) documented the function and role in the development of ports from the first generation stage to the fourth generation stage under the category of external environment, functional organization, spatial organization and port organization and strategy (see Table 8A.1). UNCTAD (1999) in its newsletter proposed the concept of “fourth generation port” (4GP), referring to vertical and horizontal integration port strategies. Following the above literature contribution, several studies contributed to classifying ports’ typologies and to elaborating their roles and functions in a comprehensive way (e.g., Beresford et al., 2004; Bichou and Gray, 2005; Flynn et al., 2011; Lee and Lam, 2014, 2015; Paixao and Marlow, 2003; Pettit and Beresford, 2009; Verhoeven, 2010). Flynn et al. (2011) proposed the “fifth generation port” (5GP) with the introduction of “port ladder” for customer centric community-focused port. Most existing literature has not focused on the types of container ports. Container ports are key facilitators of international trade development, being a critical node in the context of supply chain management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acciaro, M., Vanelslander, T., Sys, C., Ferrari, C., Roumboutsos, A., Giuliano, G., Lam, J.S.L. and Kapros, S. (2014) Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: A Framework for Successful Innovation, Maritime Policy & Management, 41(5), 480–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, A.K.C., Gardner, B.M. and Pettit S.J. (2004) The UNCTAD and WORKPORT Models of Port Development: Evolution or Revolution? Maritime Policy & Management, 31(2), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichou, K and Gray, R. (2005) A Critical Review of Conventional Terminology for Classifying Seaports, Transportation Research Part A, 39, 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • BPA, Busan Port Authority (2013) 2012 Port of Busan Container Statistics, Busan: Busan Port Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. and Wang, C. (2012) Evaluating the Effects of Green Port Policy: Case Study of Kaohsiung Harbor in Taiwan, Transportation Research Part D, 17, 185–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Song, Y. and Roh, Y. (2013) Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Port Vessel Operations at the Port of Incheon, Transportation Research Part D, 25, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charan, R. (2007) What the Customer Wants You to Know How Everybody Needs to Think Differently about Sales, New York: Penguine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Langen, P.W. (2007) Stakeholders, Conflicting Interests and Governance in Port Clusters, Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 457–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debrie, J., Lavaud-Letilleul, V. and Parola, F. (2013) Shaping Port Governance: The Territorial Trajectories of Reform, Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooms, M., Verbeke, A. and Haezendonck, E. (2013) Stakeholder Management and Path Dependence in Large-Scale Transport Infrastructure Development: The Port of Antwerp Case (1960–2010), Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M. and Lee, P. T.W (2010) Customer-Centric and Community Ports as the Next Step on the Port Ladder: The Fifth Generation Ports, The 8th Asia Pacific Transportation Development Conference, Tainan, Taiwan, May 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M., Lee, P. T.W and Notteboom, T. (2011) The Next Step on the Port Generations Ladder: Customer-Centric and Community Ports. In Notteboom, T. (Ed.) Current Issues in Shipping, Ports and Logistics, University Press Antwerp, Brussels, pp. 497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, M.S. (2003) A Comparison of Service Quality at Major Container Ports: Implications for Korean Ports, Journal of Transport Geography, 11(2), 131–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. R. (2006) Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Community Relations: Measuring Relationship-Building Results, Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, K.C and Lee, P. T.W (2011) Developing a New Technique for Evaluating Service Quality of Container Ports, In Notteboom, T. (Ed.) Current Issues in Shipping, Ports and Logistics, Brussels: University Press Antwerp, pp. 337–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, J.S.L. (2011) Patterns of Maritime Supply Chains: Slot Capacity Analysis, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2), 366–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, J.S.L. and Yap, W.Y. (2011a) Container Port Competition and Complementarity in Supply Chain Systems: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 13(2), 102–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, J.S.L. and Yap, W.Y. (2011b) Dynamics of Liner Shipping Network and Port Connectivity in Supply Chain Systems: Analysis on East Asia, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1272–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.T.W. and Flynn, M. (2011) Charting A New Paradigm of Container Port Development Policy: The Asian Doctrine, Transport Reviews, 31(6), 791–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.T.W. and Hu, K.-C. (2012) Evaluation of the Service Quality of Container Ports by Importance-Performance Analysis, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 4(3), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.T.W., Lam, J.S.L., Lin, C.-W., Hu, K.-C. and Cheong, I.K. (2014) The Fifth Port Generation Port (5GP) in the context of Dynamic Port Logistics Centre: An Empirical Test, International Workshop on ‘Research Trends of International Trade and Transport Logistics,’ Inha University, Korea, 10–11 November, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.T.W., Wu, J.-Z, Hu, K.-C. and Flynn, M. (2013) Applying Analytic Network Process (ANP) to Rank Critical Success Factors of Waterfront Redevelopment, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5(4/5), 390–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.T.W, Wu, J.-Z., Suthiwartnarueput, K., Hu, K.-C. and Rodjanapradied, R. (forthcoming) A Comparative Study of Key Critical Factors of Waterfront Port Development: Case Studies of Incheon Inner Port and Bangkok Port, Growth and Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.T.W. (2014) Diversification of Port Functions: 5th Generation Port, International Symposium on the Prospects for Sustainable Port, Korea Maritime Institute, Seoul, Korea, 28 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.T.W. and Lam, J.S.L. (2013) Fifth Generation Ports? Competitiveness Analysis on Major Asian Ports, Proceedings of The International Workshop on Port Economics, National University of Singapore, 9–10 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.T.W. and Lam, J.S.L. (2015) Container Port Competition and Competitiveness Analysis: Asian Major Ports, In Lee, C.Y. and Meng, Q. (Ed.) Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics – Making Global Supply Chain Effective, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 220, New York: Springer, pp. 97–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.T.W, Park, N.-K., Joint, J.F. and Kim, W-K (2000) A New Efficient EDI System for Container Cargo Logistics, Maritime Policy & Management, 27(2), 133–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, C., Tseng, P., Cullinane, K. and Lu, C. (2010) The Impact of an Emerging Port on the Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Inland Container Transport: An Empirical Study of Taipei Port, Energy Policy, 38, 5251–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martelo, S., Barroso, C. and Cepeda, G. (2013) The Use of Organizational Capabilities to Increase Customer Value, Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2042–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monios, J. and Wilmsmeier, G. (2012) Port-Centric Logistics, Dry Ports and Offshore Logistics Hubs: Strategies to Overcome Double Peripherality?, Maritime Policy & Management, 39(2), 207–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman, M.R., Bruce, G.J. and Hamid, S.A. (2011) The Strength of Malaysian Maritime Cluster: The Development of Maritime Policy, Ocean & Coastal Management, 54(8), 557–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paixao, A.C. and Marlow, P.B. (2003) Fourth Generation Ports: A Question of Agility? International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 33(4), 355–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perego, A., Perotti, S. and Mangiaracina, R. (2011) ICT for Logistics and Freight Transportation: A Literature Review and Research Agenda, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(5), 457–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, S.J. and Beresford, A.K.C. (2009) Port Development: From Gateways to Logistics Hubs, Maritime Policy & Management, 36(3), 253–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (1994) Port Marketing and the Challenge of the Third Generation Port. Trade and Development Board Committee on Shipping ad hoc Intergovernmental Group of Port Experts, TD/B/C.4/AC.7/14, 13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (1999) The Fourth Generation Port, UNCTAD Ports Newsletter, 19, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Berg, L. and Van Klink, H.A. (1995) From City-Port to Port-Network, Tinbergen Institute, Discussion Paper No. TI95–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Klink, H.A. (1995) Towards the Borderless Mainport Rotterdam: An Analysis of Functional, Spatial, and Administrative Dynamics in Port Systems, EUR, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, P. (2010) A Review of Port Authority Functions: Towards a Renaissance?, Maritime Policy & Management, 37(3), 247–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. and Ducruet, C. (2012) New Port Development and Global City Making: Emergence of The Shanghai – Yangshan Multilayered Gateway Hub, Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J.J. and Cheng, M.C. (2010) From a Hub Port City to a Global Supply Chain Management Center: A Case Study of Hong Kong, Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 104–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y.C.J. and Goh, M. (2010) Container Port Efficiency in Emerging and More Advanced Markets, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(6), 1030–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, W.Y. and Lam, J.S.L. (2013) 80 Million-TEU Container Port? Sustainability Issues in Port and Coastal Development, Ocean & Coastal Management, 71, 13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. and Lam, J.S.L. (2013) Maritime Cluster Evolution Based on Symbiosis Theory and Lotka-Volterra Model, Maritime Policy & Management, 40(2), 161–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, A. and Lam, J.S.L. (2014) Impacts of Schedule Reliability and Sailing Frequency on the Liner Shipping and Port Industry: A Study of Daily Maersk, Transportation Journal, 53(2), 235–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Paul Tae-Woo Lee and Jasmine Siu Lee Lam

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, P.TW., Lam, J.S.L. (2016). Developing the Fifth Generation Ports Model. In: Lee, P.TW., Cullinane, K. (eds) Dynamic Shipping and Port Development in the Globalized Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514295_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics