Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Women’s Participation in Global Executive Positions

  • Chapter
Gender and Power

  • 1104 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines several aspects of women’s participation in top executive positions in global firms. In the business sector, which comprises a significant proportion of the private sector, quota systems have not been incorporated into either national or international legislation. The inclusion of women in top executive positions thus depends on the decisions of a few powerful people, usually men, at the top of the firm’s hierarchy. Women’s advancement in the business milieu also depends on individual women’s personal resources, which help them weave their way to the top. Studies show that women in top positions contribute to the economic and social success of their firms (Annis, 2008; McKinsey & Company, 2010; Coleman, 2011). Even so, it is apparent that the costs and benefits of globalization are distributed unevenly among different groups within the executive world as they are outside it. They are distributed unevenly especially across gender but also within each gender, according to local cultures, personal skills, economic status, and firms’ policies. For some groups of women and men, globalization opens up new opportunities, but for others it denies the opportunity to take part in and advance to top positions in global firms. With the aid of the Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) (Branisa et al., 2014), which measures underlying discrimination against women for over 100 countries, it was found that gender equality and the opportunities given to women in social institutions vary in different world regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Acker, Joan (1989). “Making Gender Visible,” in: Wallace, Ruth A. (Ed.) Feminism and Sociological Theory. London: Sage Publications. 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, Joan (1990). “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations,” Gender and Society, 4(2): 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Nancy J. (1994). “Competitive Frontiers: Women Managing Across Borders,” Journal of Management Development, 13(2): 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Nancy J. (1997). “Global Leadership: Women Leaders,” Management International Review, 37: 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Nancy J. (2002). “Global Managers: No Longer Men Alone,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(5): 743–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, Yochanan and Shortland, Susan (2008). “Women and International Assignments: Taking Stock — a 25 year Review,” Human Resource Management, 47(2): 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annis, Barbara (2008). “Men and Women in Leadership,” Canadian Manager, 20(4): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, Linda and Laschever, Sara (2003). Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, Janeen and Wright Erik, Olin (2000). “The Glass Ceiling Hypothesis: A Reply to Critics,” Gender and Society, 14(6): 814–821. Available at: http://proxy.library.eiu.edu:3163/stable/190377

  • Blumberg, Rae Lesser (1989). Making the Case for the Gender Variable: Women and the Wealth and Well-Being of Nations. Washington, DC: Agency for International Development/Office of Women in Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branisa, Boris, Klasen, Stephan, Ziegler, Maria, Drechsler, Denis, and Jutting, Johannes (2014). The Institutional Basis of Gender Inequality: The Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI). Feminist Economics, 20(2): 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, Janet (1990). Gender Equity: An Integrated Theory of Stability and Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Isobel (2011). “Women and the Global Economy,” Yale Journal of International Affairs, 6(1): 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Alison and Glass, Christy (2013). Women and Top Leadership Positions: Towards an Institutional Analysis. Gender, Work and Organization. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwao.1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Francine M (2007). “Undoing Gender,” Gender & Society, 21(1): 106–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doldor, Elena, Anderson, Deirdre, and Vinnicombe, Susan (2013). “Refining the Concept of Political Will: A Gender Perspective,” British Journal of Management, 24: 414–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, Alice H. and Carl, Linda L. (2003). “The Female Leadership Advantage: An Evaluation of the Evidence,” The Leadership Quarterly, 14: 807–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, Alice H and Fischer, Agneta (2010). “Gender Inequalities in Power in Organizations,” in: Dean, Tjosvold and Barbara, Wisse (Eds.) Power and Interdependence in Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 186–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmuti, Dean, Jia, Heather and Davis, Henry H. (2009). “Challenges Women Face in Leadership Positions and Organizational Effectiveness: An investigation,” Journal of Leadership Education, 8(2): 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel, Naomi and Natalia Sarkisian (2006). “Marriage: The Good, the Bad, and the Greedy.” Contexts, 5, 4 (November), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladman, Kimberly and Lamb, Michelle (2013). GMI Ratings’ 2013 Women on Boards Survey. Available at: http://www.gmiratings.com, accessed 15 June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory-Mina, Heidi Joy (2012). “Gender Barriers of Women Striving for a Corporate Officer Position: A Literature Review,” Advancing Women in Leadership, 32: 54–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Katharine (2008). The Value of a Mentor. Available at: http://www.quintcareers.com/mentor_value.html, accessed 13 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, Madeline E., Wallen, Aaron S., Fuchs, Daniella and Tamkins, Melinda M. (2004). “Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, Kate, Lirio Pamela, Metcalfe, and Dawn, Beverly (2012). “Gender, Globalisation and Development: A Re-Evaluation of the Nature of Women’s Global Work,” International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(9): 1763–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth M. (1982). “The Impact of Hierarchical Structures on the Work Behavior of Women and Men,” in: Rachel, Kahn-Hut, Arlene, Kaplan Daniels and Richard, Colvard (Eds.) Women and Work: Problems and Perspectives. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. 415–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karve, Shailaja and Nair, Shreekumar K. (2010). “Role Stress and Coping with Stress Among Indian Women Executives,” International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(12): 57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company (2010). “Women at the Top of Corporations: Making It Happen (Women Matter 2010),” McKinsey Quarterly, (3): 1–20. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/dotcom/client_service/Organization/PDFs/Women_matter_oct2010_english.ashx

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company (2012). “Making the Breakthrough (Women Matter 2012) [pdf],” McKinsey Quarterly, (1): 1–23. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/organization/latest_thinking/women_matter. http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/dotcom/client_service/Organization/PDFs/Women_matter_mar2012_english.ashx

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, Debra and Fletcher, Joyce K. (2000). “A Modest Manifesto for Shattering the Glass Ceiling,” Harvard Business Review, 78(1): 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsod, Solita (2001). Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities, Quezon City, The Philippines: University of The Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, Y.F. and Dovidio, J.F. (1998). “Relationship of Solo Status, Academic Rank, and Perceived Distinctiveness to Job Satisfaction of Racial/Ethnic Minorities,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, Regina M. and Blake-Beard, Stacy D. (2002). “Gender Barriers to the Female Mentor — Male Protégé Relationship,” Journal of Business Ethics, 37: 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, Charles A., Chatman, Jennifer and Caldwell, David F. (1991). “People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit,” Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 487–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palgi, Michal (2000). “Top People and Mentors,” in: Mino, Vianello and Gwen, Moore (Eds.) Gendering Elites — Economic and Political Leadership in 27 Industrialized Societies. New York and London: Macmillan. 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palgi, Michal and Moore, Gwen (2004). “Social Capital: Mentors and Contacts,” Current Sociology, 52(3): 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrewe, Pamela L. and Nelson, Debra L. (2004). “Gender and Career Success: The Facilitative Role of Political Skill,” Organizational Dynamics, 33(4): 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poster, Winifred R. (2000). Gender, Social Control, and Global Corporation: A Study of High-Tech Companies in India and the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selmer, Jan and Leung, Alicia S.M. (2003). “Are Corporate Career Development Activities Less Available to Female Than to Male Expatriates?” Journal of Business Ethics, 43: 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy (1988). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Catherine (2010). “Occupational Sex Composition and the General Availability of Workplace Support,” Gender and Society, 24(2): 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vianen, Annelies, E.M. and Fischer, Agneta H. (2002). “Illuminating the Glass Ceiling: The Role of Organizational Culture Preferences,” Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 75(3): 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, Sheila, Kropf, Marcia and Gerkovich, Paulette (2003). “What’s Holding Women Back,” Harvard Business Review, 81(6): 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, Patricia H. (2011). “Women Leaders in a Globalized World,” Leadership, Gender and Organization, Issues in Business Ethics, 27: 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wippermann, Carsten (2010). Women in Executive Positions Barriers and Bridges. Heidelberg: Sinus Sociovision. Available at: http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Broschuerenstelle/Pdf-Anlagen/frauen-in-fuehrungspositionen-nglisch,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Long-Zeng, Yim, Frederick Hong-kit, Kwan, Ho Kwong and Zhang, Xiaomeng (2012). “Coping With Workplace Ostracism: The Roles of Ingratiation and Political Skill in Employee Psychological Distress,” Journal of Management Studies, 49(1): 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Michal Palgi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Università di Roma La Sapienza, Italy

    Mino Vianello

  2. Rutgers University, USA

    Mary Hawkesworth

Copyright information

© 2016 Michal Palgi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palgi, M. (2016). Women’s Participation in Global Executive Positions. In: Vianello, M., Hawkesworth, M. (eds) Gender and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514165_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514165_7

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51415-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51416-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation