Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research in information systems: a study of diversity and inter-disciplinary discourse in the AIS basket journals between 1995 and 2011

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems

Abstract

The paper investigates how Information Systems (IS) has emerged as the product of interdisciplinary discourses. The research aim in this study is to better understand diversity in IS research, and the extent to which the diversity of discourse expanded and contracted from 1995 to 2011. Methodologically, we apply a combined citations/co-citations analysis based on the eight Association for Information Systems basket journals and the 22 subject-field classification framework provided by the Association of Business Schools. Our findings suggest that IS is in a state of continuous interaction and competition with other disciplines. General Management was reduced from a dominant position as a reference discipline in IS at the expense of a growing variety of other discourses including Business Strategy, Marketing, and Ethics and Governance, among others. Over time, IS as a field moved from the periphery to a central position during its discursive formation. This supports the notion of IS as a fluid discipline dynamically embracing a diverse range of adjacent reference disciplines, while keeping a degree of continuing interaction with them. Understanding where IS is currently at allows us to better understand and propose fruitful avenues for its development in both academia and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions: An essay on the division of expert labor, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of Disciplines, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • AIS (2011). Senior Scholars’ Basket of Journals, Association for Information Systems, Retrieved January 2012 from http://home.aisnet.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R., Lyytinen, K., Sambamurthy, V. and Straub, D. (2010). A Response to the Design-Oriented Information Systems Research Memorandum, [Opinion Piece] European Journal of Information Systems, Advanced Online Publication (AOP) 20(1): 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R. and Myers, M. (2002). Information Systems as a Reference Discipline, MIS Quarterly 26(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of Post Modernity, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I. and Barki, H. (2007). Quo Vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4): 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K. and Mead, M. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 11(3): 369–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. (2003). The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties, MIS Quarterly 27(2): 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, M., Kim, H. and Wade, M. (2006). Relationships among the Academic Business Disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis, Omega 34(4): 359–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A. (2008). The Future of Information Systems — 2014; Thinking informatically, European Journal of Information Systems 17(6): 695–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. and Hirschheim, R. (2004). A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of Information Systems Research from 1991 to 2001, Information Systems Journal 14(3): 197–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba, J.-R., Pilkington, A. and Bernroider, E.W.N. (2012). Information Systems as a Discipline in the Making: Comparing EJIS and MISQ between 1995 and 2008, European Journal of Information Systems 21(5): 479–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M.J. (1986). The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972–1982: A co-citation analysis, Management Science 32(2): 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L. and Lewin, A.Y. (2008). Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution, Organization Science 19(1): 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering work through information technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. and Bagozzi, R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology — 2014; A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35(8): 982–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research 3(1): 60–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A ten-year update, Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4): 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y. and Kuljis, J. (2008). Profile of IS Research Published in the European Journal of Information Systems, European Journal of Information Systems 17(6): 678–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, M. (1989). Management Strategies for Information Technology, London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research, The Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). What is an Author? in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought, London: Penguin, pp. 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). Afterword: The subject and power, in H.L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, Brighton: The Harvester Press, pp. 208–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom, in P. Rabinow (ed.) Michel Foucault: Ethics subjectivity and truth: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, London: Penguin, pp. 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. (1977). A Set of Measures of Centrality Based Upon Betweenness, Sociometry 40(1): 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. (1990). Re-Engineering Work: Don’t automate, obliterate, Harvard Business Review 68(4): 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A manifesto for business revolution, London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R.A. and Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods, Riverside, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S., Lyytinen, K. and Markus, M.L. (2006). The Legacy of ‘Power and Politics’ in Disciplinary Discourse: A citation analysis, Paper Presented at the ICIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C., Kelly, A., Morris, H. and Rowlinson, M. (2010). Academic Journal Quality Guide —2014; Version 4, London: The Association of Business Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, N. (2006). Is Information Systems a Discipline? A Foucauldian and Toulminian analysis, Paper Presented at the 27th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Milwaukee, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, N.R. and Will, H.J. (2006). Synthesizing Diversity and Pluralism in Information Systems: Forging a unique disciplinary subject matter for the information systems field, Communications of the AIS 17(7): 152–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., Iivari, J. and Klein, H.K. (2004). Towards a Distinctive Body of Knowledge for Information Systems Experts: Coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals, Information Systems Journal 14(4): 313–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D.L. and Holbrook, M.B. (1993). The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the journal of consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research 19(4): 505–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introna, L.D. (2003). Disciplining Information Systems: Truth and its regimes, European Journal of Information Systems 12(3): 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamada, T. and Kawai, S. (1989). An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs, Information Processing Letters 31(1): 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Savage, K.S., Howey, R.M. and Van Hoof, H.B. (2009). Academic Foundations for Hospitality and Tourism Research: A reexamination of citations, Tourism Management 30(5): 752–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (2008). The Structure of the IS Discipline Reconsidered: Implications and reflections from a community of practice perspective, Information and Organization 18(4): 280–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, S.M. (1989). A Citation Analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research, The Journal of Consumer Research 15(4): 492–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. and Zhou, P. (2005). Are the Contributions of China and Korea Upsetting the World System of Science? Scientometrics 63(3): 617–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. and King, J. (2004). Nothing at the Center?: Academic legitimacy in the information systems field, Journal of the AIS 5(6): 220–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W., Yates, J. and Benjamin, R.I. (1987). Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies, Communications of the ACM 30(6): 484–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, M. (1983). Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation, Communications of the ACM 26(6): 430–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan, F.W. (1984). Information Technology Changes the Way You Compete, Harvard Business Review 61(3): 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. and Walsham, G. (2010). Toward Ethical Information Systems: The contribution of discourse ethics, MIS Quarterly 34(4): 833–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research 2(3): 192–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesterle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H. and Sinz, E.J. (2010). Memorandum on Design-Oriented Information Systems Research, European Journal of Information Systems, Advanced Online Publication (AOP) 20(1): 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research 2(1): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Robey, D. (1991). Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations, Information Systems Research 2(2): 143–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. and Berry, L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research, Journal of Marketing 49(4): 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R.J. (2008). The Only Duty We Owe to History is to Rewrite It: Reflections on Bob Galliers’ article ‘a discipline for a stage?’, European Journal of Information Systems 17(6): 444–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, R., Baumgartner, H., Vermunt, J. and Bijmolt, T. (1999). Importance and Similarity in the Evolving Citation Network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing 16(2): 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, A. and Chai, K.H. (2008). Research Themes, Concepts and Relationships: A study of international journal of service industry management (1990–2005), International Journal of Service Industry Management 19(1): 83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, A. and Meredith, J. (2009). The Evolution of the Intellectual Structure of Operations Management — 2014; 1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis, Journal of Operations Management 27(3): 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, A. and Teichert, T. (2006). Management of Technology: Themes, concepts and relationships, Technovation 26(3): 288–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1986). Competition in Global Industries, Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. and Millar, V.E. (1985). How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Review 63(4): 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodríguez, A.R. and Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the Intellectual Structure of Strategic Management Research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000, Strategic Management Journal 25(10): 981–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation, 4th edn. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1994). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharplin, A.D. and Mabry, R.H. (1985). The Relative Importance of Journals Used in Management Research: An alternative ranking, Human Relations 38(2): 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., Sakata, I. and Matsushima, K. (2011). Detecting Emerging Research Fronts in Regenerative Medicine by the Citation Network Analysis of Scientific Publications, Using Technological Intelligence for Strategic Decision Making in High Technology Environments 78(2): 274–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, H.G. (1973). Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24(4): 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M.J. (2010). Using the Theory of the Professions to Understand the IS Identity Crisis, European Journal of Information Systems 4(19): 382–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessey, I., Ramesh, V. and Glass, R.L. (2002). Research in Information Systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals, Journal of Management Information Systems 19(2): 129–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M., Biehl, M. and Kim, H. (2006). Information Systems is Not a Reference Discipline (And What We Can Do about It), Journal of the AIS 7(5): 247–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H.D. (1990). Author Co-Citation Analysis: Overview and defense, in C.L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 84–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, W.A. (1999). Tunnel Vision and Blind Spots: What the past tells us about the present; reflections on the twentieth-century history of American librarianship, The Library Quarterly 69(1): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and methods, 1st edn. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and methods, 2nd edn. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Information Management and Control, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria

    Edward W N Bernroider

  2. School of Management, University of London, Surrey, UK

    Alan Pilkington & José-Rodrigo Córdoba

Authors
  1. Edward W N Bernroider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Pilkington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José-Rodrigo Córdoba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. London School of Economics and Political Science, UK

    Leslie P. Willcocks

  2. University of Oxford, UK

    Chris Sauer

  3. University of Missouri, USA

    Mary C. Lacity

Copyright information

© 2015 Journal of Information Technology (JIT)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernroider, E.W.N., Pilkington, A., Córdoba, JR. (2015). Research in information systems: a study of diversity and inter-disciplinary discourse in the AIS basket journals between 1995 and 2011. In: Willcocks, L.P., Sauer, C., Lacity, M.C. (eds) Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509888_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation