Abstract
This chapter analyses the different frames that emerged during the mobilizations of precarious workers that occurred in Italy in the early 2000s, involving hundreds of thousands of protesters all over the country. In the past, workers’ movements had been rather homogeneous, representing workers who experienced very similar working and living conditions. In this sense, it was possible to speak about a rather homogeneous working class that developed mostly in the urban environment, around factories whose workers shared similar visions about themselves and their role in society. In advanced capitalistic societies, workers’ movements progressively lost their centrality in the struggles towards a more just society. At the same time, the trade unions, the institutional political actors that once represented them — also an outcome of workers’ movements — severely shrank in membership, with union density collapsing in the last decades. Workers, though, did not disappear from contentious politics. And neither did workers’ organizations, broadly conceived. Rather, they changed the way in which they engaged in protests, the organizational forms they selected to mobilize, and the discourses they elaborated around labour issues. This happened also because, despite the relevant heritage of unionism for workers, the very structure of the labour market changed dramatically in the past few decades.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
A. Aringoli, G. Calella, D. Corradi, C. Giardullo, L. Gori, A. Montefusco, and T. Montella (2006) Studiare con lentezza. L’università, la precarietà e il ritorno delle rivolte studentesche (Roma: Edizioni Alegre).
G. Bateson (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind (New York: Ballantine Books).
U. Beck (2000) The Brave New World of Work (Cambridge: Polity Press).
R. D. Benford and D. A. Snow (2000) ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
L. Boltanski and F. Chiapello (1999) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme (Paris: Gallimard).
ChainWorkers (2001) Mayday 2001 call for action, http://www.ecn.org/chainworkers/chainw/mayday/mayday.html, date accessed 2 March 2015.
ChainWorkers (2002) Mayday 2002 call for action, http://web.archive.org/web/20021006022442/ http://www.chainworkers.org/chainw/md2002/index.htm, date accessed 2 March 2015.
ChainWorkers (2003) Mayday 2003 call for action, http://web.archive.org/web/20030626225351/ http://www.chainworkers.org/chainw/mayday/mayday.html, date accessed 2 March 2015.
J. J. Chun (2009) Organizing at the Margins: The Symbolic Politics of Labor in South Korea and the United States (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
B. L. Epstein (1991) Political Protest and Cultural Revolution: Nonviolent Direct Action in the 1970s and 1980s (Berkeley: University of California Press).
EuroMayDay (2004) Euromayday 2004 call for action, http://web.archive.org/web/20040607035704/ http://www.euromayday.org/lang_eng.html, last accessed 2 March 2015.
EuroMayDay (2005) Euromayday 2005 call for action, http://web.archive.org/web/20050419011856/ http://www.euromayday.org/, last accessed 2 March 2015.
N. Fraser (2003) ‘Rethinking Recognition: Overcoming Displacement and Reification in Cultural Politics’, in B. Hobson (ed.), Recognition Struggles and Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 21–34.
W. A. Gamson (1992) Talking Politics (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press).
J. Gerhards and D. Rucht (1992) ‘Mesomobilization: Organizing and Framing in Two Protest Campaigns in West Germany’, American Journal of Sociology, 98 (3), 555–596.
E. Goffman (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
E. Goffman (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
M. Grispini (2006) 1977 (Roma: Manifestolibri).
S. Häusermann and H. Schwander (2012) ‘Varieties of Dualization? Labor Market Segmentation and Insider-Outsider Divides across Regimes’, in P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier and M. Seeleib-Kaiser (eds), The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies (Oxford, UK and Malden, MA: Oxford University Press), pp. 27–51.
B. Hobson (2003) Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
A. Honneth (2001) ‘Recognition or Redistribution?: Changing Perspectives on the Moral Order of Society’, Theory, Culture & Society, 18 (2–3), 43–55.
S. A. Hunt and R. D. Benford (1994) ‘Identity Talk in the Peace and Justice Movement’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 488–517.
A. L. Kalleberg (2009) ‘Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition’, American Sociological Review, 74 (1), 1–22.
A. Mattoni (2012) Media Practices and Protest Politics. How Precarious Workers Mobilise (Farnham, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate).
A. Melucci (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press).
D. Papadopoulos, N. Stephenson and V. Tsianos (2008) Escape Routes. Control and Subversion in the 21st Century (London: Pluto Press).
F. Polletta (2002) Freedom is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Precari Atesia (2006) Verbale Ispettorato Lavoro, http://precariatesia.altervista.org/main.php, last accessed 2 March 2015.
R. Rizza (2000) ‘Trasformazioni del lavoro, nuove forme di precarizzazione lavorativa e politiche di welfare: alcune riflessioni preliminari’, in R. Rizza (ed.), Politiche del Lavoro e Nuove Forme di Precarizzazione Lavorativa (Milano: Franco Angeli), pp. 13–27.
W. G. Runciman (1972) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
D. A. Snow and R. D. Benford (1992) ‘Master Frames and Cycles of Protest’, in A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller (eds), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press), pp. 133–155.
D. A. Snow, E. B. Rochford, S. K. Worden and R. D. Benford (1986) ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation’, American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 464–481.
G. Standing (1999) Global Labour Flexibility. Seeking Distributive Justice (London: Macmillan).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Alice Mattoni
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mattoni, A. (2015). The Many Frames of the Precarious Condition. Some Insights from Italian Mobilizations against Precarity. In: della Porta, D., Hänninen, S., Siisiäinen, M., Silvasti, T. (eds) The New Social Division. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509352_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509352_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50933-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50935-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)