Abstract
While numerous academic disciplines in the social sciences and humanities study human–animal interactions, education remains behind the times, so to speak. What is obvious is overt anthropocentrism—the view that human beings are the center and most important species on Earth—that accounts for why we in education remain, to a large extent, unaffected by the increasing popularity of inquiry into human–animal relationships. It is not a stretch to suggest that most educationists believe that education concerns human beings only or that the experiences of human beings are somehow unrelated to, or should take precedence over, the experiences of non-human beings. Of course, there are educational scholars who challenge anthropocentrism by incorporating non-humans into their analysis of schooling for social and ecological justice (DeLeon, 2011; Dolby, 2012; Kahn, 2008, 2011; Martin, 2011; Martusewicz, Edmundson, & Lupinacci, 2015; Pedersen, 2009; Rice, 2013; Rowe, 2009, 2011, 2012). These notable exceptions, however, remain on the periphery of critical education scholarship that aims to interrogate and change systems of oppression, privilege, and domination. This chapter argues that animal oppression is deeply intertwined with various forms of human oppression and should therefore occupy some role in critical educational theory and practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, C. (2000). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory (10th Anniversary ed.). New York: Continuum.
Adams, C., & Donovan, J. (Eds.). (1995). Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explorations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Best, S. (2007). Book review of C. Patterson (2002), Eternal Treblinka: Our treatment of animals and the holocaust. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 5(2), 103–119.
Brown, D. (2008, February 18). USDA orders largest meat recall in U.S. history. Washington Post. Retrieved February 28, 2008 from http://www.washington-post.com/wpdyn/content/article/2008/02/17/AR2008021701530.html
Butler, J. (1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize thepolitical (pp. 3–21). New York: Routledge.
Cavalieri, P. (2001). The animal question: Why nonhuman animals deserve human rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crenshaw, K. (2005). Intersectionality and identity politics: Learning from violence against women of color. In W. Kolmar & F. Bartkowski (Eds.), Feminist theory: A reader (pp. 533–542). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Cudworth, E. (2010). ‘The recipe for love’? Continuities and changes in the sexual politics of meat. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 8(4), 78–100.
Darwin, C. (1964). On the origin of species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Davis, K. (2004). A tale of two holocausts. Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal, 2(2), 1–20.
Deckha, M. (2008). Intersectionality and posthumanist visions of equality. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 23(2), 249–267.
Deckha, M. (2010). The subhuman as a cultural agent of violence. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 3(3), 28–51.
Deckha, M. (2012). Toward a postcolonial posthumanist feminist theory: Centralizing race and culture in feminist work on nonhuman animals. Hypatia: Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 27, 527–545.
DeGrazia, D. (1996). Taking animals seriously: Mental life and moral status. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
DeLeon, A. (2010). The lure of the animal: The theoretical question of the nonhuman animal. Critical Education, 1(2), 1–24.
DeLeon, A. (2011). What’s that nonhuman doing on your lunch tray? Disciplinary spaces, school cafeterias and possibilities for resistance. In S. Robert & M. Weaver-Hightower (Eds.), School food politics: The complex ecology of hunger and feeding in schools around the world (pp. 183–200). New York: Peter Lang.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dolby, N. (2012). Rethinking multicultural education for the next generation: The new empathy and social justice. New York: Routledge.
Elstein, D. (2003). Species as a social construction: Is species morally relevant? Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 1(1), 1–19.
Fudge, E. (2002). A left-handed blow: Writing the history of animals. In N. Rothfels (Ed.), Representinganimals (pp. 3–18). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
HSUS (Humane Society of the United States). (2008). Rampant animal cruelty at Californiaslaughterplant. Retrieved April 30, 2013 from http://www.humanesociety.org/news/news/2008/01/undercover_investigation_013008.html
Kahn, R. (2008). Towards ecopedagogy: Weaving a broad-based pedagogy of liberation for animals, nature, and the oppressed peoples of the earth. In A. Darder, R. Torres, & M. Baltadano (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed.) (pp. 522–540). New York: Routledge.
Kahn, R. (2011). Towards an animal standpoint: Vegan education and the epistemology of ignorance. In E. Malewski & N. Jaramillo (Eds.), Epistemologies of ignorance in education (pp. 53–70). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Korsmeyer, C. (1999). Making sense of taste: Food and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kuehn, G. (2004). Dining on Fido: Death, identity, and the aesthetic dilemma of eating animals. In E. McKenna & A. Light (Eds.), Animal pragmatism: Rethinking human-nonhuman relationships (pp. 228–247). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Laird, S. (2008). Food for co-educational thought. Presidential essay. In B. Stengel (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2007 (pp. 1–14). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Lioi, A. (2008). An end to cosmic loneliness: Alice Walker’s essays as abolitionist enchantment. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 15(1), 11–37.
Martin, J. R (2011). Education reconfigured: Culture, encounter, and change. New York: Routledge.
Martusewicz, R., Edmundson, J., Lupinacci, J. (2015). Ecojustice education: Toward diverse, democratic, and sustainable communities (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Patterson, C. (2002). Eternal Treblinka: Our treatment of animals and the holocaust. New York: Lantern Books.
Pedersen, H. (2009). Animals in schools: Processes and strategies in human-animal education. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Regan, T. (1984). The case for animal rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Regan, T, & Singer, P. (Eds.). (1989). Animal rights and human obligations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rice, S. (2013). Three educational problems: The case of eating animals. Journal of Thought, 28(2), 112–127.
Rollin, B. (2006). Animal rights andhuman morality (3rd ed.). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Rowe, B. (2009). Animal rights and human growth: Intellectual courage and extending the moral community. Philosophical Studies in Education, 40, 153–166.
Rowe, B. (2011). Understanding animals-becoming-meat: Embracing a disturbing education. Critical Education, 2(7), 1–25.
Rowe, B. (2012). Food, habit, and the consumption of animals as educational encounter. In C. Ruitenberg (Ed.), Philosophy of education2012 (pp. 210–218). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Rowe, B, & Rocha, S. (in press). School lunch is not a meal: Posthuman eating as folk phenomenology. Educational Studies.
Safran-Foer, J. (2009). Eatinganimals. New York: Little, Brown.
Shusterman, R. (1999). Somaesthetics: A disciplinary proposal. The journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 57(3), 299–313.
Singer, P. (1990). Animalliberation (2nd ed.). New York: The New York Review of Books.
Spiegel, M. (1997). The dreaded comparison: Human and animal slavery. New York: Mirror Books.
Twine, R. (2010). Intersectional disgust? Animals and (eco)feminism. Feminism & Psychology, 20(3), 397–406.
Walker, A. (1988). Am I blue? In Living in the world (pp. 3–8). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
Walker, A. (1988). Am I blue? In Living in the world (pp. 3–8). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2016 Bradley Rowe
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rowe, B. (2016). Challenging Anthropocentrism in Education: Posthumanist Intersectionality and Eating Animals as Gastro-Aesthetic Pedagogy. In: Rice, S., Rud, A.G. (eds) The Educational Significance of Human and Non-Human Animal Interactions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137505255_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137505255_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57512-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50525-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)