Skip to main content

Abstract

Eileen E. Schell offers an overview of the changing conditions of employment for faculty working off the tenure track and discusses teaching and scholarly work viewed against the backdrop of larger social and economic shifts occurring in US higher education. This introduction considers how works such as the present volume—focused on opportunities for contingent f acuity members to publish—can help make the work of contingent teachers and scholars more visible in ways that lead to transparency of working conditions within higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 67.50
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Abel, Emily K. Terminal Degrees: The Job Crisis in Higher Education. New York: Praeger, 1984. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Professors subcommittee of the Committee on Contingency in the Profession. “Tenure and Teaching Intensive Appointments.” American Association of University Professors. N.p. October 2009. Web. 15 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Hans Christian. “The Emperor’s New Suit.” Classic Literature.com 1837. N.p. Web. 15 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Ernest. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Special Report of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Coordinating Committee. “National Call for March 4 Strike and Day of Action to Defend Public Education. University of California-Davis Graduate Student Association. N.p. Web. 15 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalition on Contingent Academic Labor. 10 Point Plan. Flyer. January 2001. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, John Aubrey. “Higher Education Budgets and the Global Recession: Tracking Varied National Responses and Their Consequences.” Research and Occasional Paper Series: Center for Studies in Higher Education 4.10. University of California, Berkeley. 1–26. PDF. February 2010. Web. 15 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gappa, Judith M. and David W. Leslie. The Invisible Faculty: Improving the Status of Part-Timers in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1993. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jay P, Brian Kisida, and Jonathon Mills. “Administrative Bloat at American Universities: The Real Reason for High Costs in Higher Education.” Goldwater Institute Policy Report #239. Goldwater Institute. 1–19. PDF. 17 August 2010. Web. 15 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, Tom. “We Can’t Afford to Be Quiet about the Rising Costs of College.” Chronicle of Higher Education. N.p. 28 March 2010. Web. 15 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshower, Leon B. and David Kirch. “Administrative Growth at the ‘University’: A Case Study.” Journal of College Teaching and Learning. PDF. 47–52. January 2005. Web. 15 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Stephen. The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook, 1987. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, Gary. “We Are All Contingent.” Keynote address, Virginia Commonwealth University. Video. 26 February 2010. Web. 15 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, Eileen E. Gypsy Academics and Mother-teachers: Gender, Contingent Labor, and Writing Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, Boynton/Cook, 1997. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Patricia Lambert Stock, eds. Moving a Mountain: Transforming the Role of Contingent Faculty in Composition Studies and Higher Education. Urbana: NCTE, 2001. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Peter. “The AAUP’s Cary Nelson Goes to War.” Chronicle of Higher Education. N.p. 17 December 2009. Web. 15 November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • AAUP. “Expectations, Priorities, and Rewards.” Academe 80.1 (1994): 35–48. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalition on the Academic Workforce (CAW). “A Portrait of Part-Time Faculty.” Coalition on the Academic Workforce. 2012 Web. 25 January 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Matthew, and Kathleen Hancock. “Women and Academic Publishing: Preliminary Results from a Survey of the ISA Membership.” Conference Papers—International Studies Association (2010): 1–57. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Sue Ellen. “Women’s Work: The Feminizing of Composition.” Rhetoric Review 9.2 (Spring, 1991): 201–229. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, Erin. “Not By Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings.” American Sociological Review 72.4 (2007): 533–561. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, Donna. The Managerial Unconscious in the History of Composition Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Eileen E. Schell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schell, E.E., Armour-Hileman, V. (2015). The New Faculty Majority: Changing Conditions and a Changing Scholarly Publication Environment. In: Guglielmo, L., Gaillet, L.L. (eds) Contingent Faculty Publishing in Community: Case Studies for Successful Collaborations. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137491626_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics