Skip to main content

Working with Risk in Child Welfare Settings

  • Chapter
Communicating Risk

Part of the book series: Communicating in Professions and Organizations ((PSPOD))

  • 797 Accesses

Abstract

In carrying out everyday duties, statutory social workers make sense of risk. Understandably then, the language of risk is drawn on discursively to help define, classify, and decide a course of action to protect children from danger and harm (Coppock & McGovern, 2014; Featherstone, 2013; Kemshall, 2010; Stanley, 2013; Webb, 2006). Social workers do this on behalf of the state where the rights of children to be free from harm and abuse are enshrined in law. This is a legitimate activity for statutory social workers — as their work is primarily about making sure that children are protected, as best they can be, from abuse and neglect. The work is tough, with significant decisions needing to be made about children and their families. Risk communication is central to these practice decisions — and, the subject of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aradau, Claudia and van Munster, Rens (2007). Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un)knowing the future. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 89–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, G. D. and Mann, R. E. (2011). Good lives and risk assessment: Collaborative approaches to risk assessment with sexual offenders. In: H. Kemshall and B. Wilkinson (eds) Good Practice in Assessing Risk: Current Knowledge, Issues and Approaches. London: JKP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risikogesellschaft: Risk Society: Towards a new Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2002). The terrorist threat world risk society revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, August 2002 19(4), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, I. K. and Kelly, S. (2000). Building Solutions in Child Protective Services. London: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S. and Pithpouse, A. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1046–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M. (2004). Child and Family Welfare: Statutory Responses to Children at Risk. Christchurch: Te Awatea Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M. and Ward, T. (2008). Morals, Rights and Practice in the Human Services. Jessica Kingslea: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppock, V. and McGovern, M. (2014), ‘Dangerous Minds’? deconstructing counter-terrorism discourse, radicalisation and the ‘Psychological Vulnerability’ of Muslim children and young people in Britain. Children & Society, 28, 242–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culpitt, I. (1998). Social Policy and Risk. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, V. (2014). Beware drfit to police state, chief constable warns. Guardian Newspaper, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B., Broadhurst, K., and Holt, K. (2012). Thinking systemically — Thinking politically: Building strong partnerships with children and families in the context of rising inequality. British Journal of Social Work, 42(4), 618–633. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B (2013). Working with fathers: Risk or resource? In Jane Ribbens McCarthy, Carol-Ann Hooper, and Val Gillies (eds) Family Troubles?:Exploring Changes and Challenges in the Family lives of Children and Young People. Policy Press: Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B., White S. and Morris. K. (2014). Re-Imagining Child Protection: Towards Humane Social work with Families. Policy Press: Bristol.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, H. (2004). Protecting Children in time: Child Abuse, Child Protection and the Consequences of Modernity. Houndmills, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Firkins, A. and Candlin, C. N. (2011). ‘She is not coping’: Risk assessment and claims of deficit in social work. In C. N. Candlin and J. Crichton (eds) Discourses of Deficit (pp. 81–98). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, D., (2010). Playing with fire or rediscovering fire? The perils and potential for evidence based practice in child and family social work. In P. Ayre and M. Preston-Shoot (eds) Children Services at the Cross Road: A Critical Evaluation of Contemporary Policy for Practice. Plymouth: Russell House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. J. and Slembrouck, S. (2011). Categorisations of child ‘in need’ and child ‘in need of protection’ and implications for the formulation of deficit parenting. In C. N. Candlin and J. Crichton (eds) Discourses of Deficit (pp. 63–80). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horlick-Jones, T., (2005). On risk work: Professional discourse and everyday action. Health Risk and Society, 7(3), 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. (2014). The Story of Baby P: Setting the Record Straight. Policy Press: Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2010). Risk rationalities in contemporary social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1247–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. and O’Byrne, P. (2002). Brief counselling: Narratives and Solutions. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, J. and Siddiqui, A. (2013). The Prevent Strategy: A Cradle to Grave Police-State. Cage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2010). Conflating risks: Implications for accurate risk prediction in child welfare services. Health, Risk and Society, 12(2), 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribbens McCarthy, J. (2013). What is at stake in family troubles? Existential issue and value frameworks. In Jane Ribbens McCarthy, Carol-Ann Hooper, and Val Gillies (eds) Family Troubles?:Exploring Changes and Challenges in the Family lives of Children and Young People. Policy Press: Bristol.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nikolas. (1999). Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saleebey, D. (1997). The Strengths Perspective in Social work Practice (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. (2013). ‘Our tariff will rise’: Risk probabilities and child protection. Health Risk and Society, 15(1), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. and R. Mills (2014). “Signs of Safety” practice at the health and children’s social care interface. Practice, 26(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. and M. Russell (2014). The principal child and family social worker: A Munro recommendation in action. Practice, 26(2), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, J. and D. Lupton (2003). Risk and Everyday Life. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnell, A. and S. Edwards (1999). Signs of Safety: A Solution and Safety Oriented Approach to Child Protection Casework. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. and R. Mann (2004). Good lives and rehabilitation of sex offenders: A positive approach to treatment. In: A. Linley and S. Joseph (eds) Positive Psychology in Practice. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. (2006). Social Work in a Risk Society: Social and Political Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Anne. (1999). Guilty knowledge. Families in Society, 80(4),327–332. doi: 10.1606/1044–3894.1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, J. (2008). Heading into the unknown: Everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty. Health, Risk & Society, 10(5), 439–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Tony Stanley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stanley, T. (2016). Working with Risk in Child Welfare Settings. In: Crichton, J., Candlin, C.N., Firkins, A.S. (eds) Communicating Risk. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478788_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478788_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55659-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47878-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics