Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles and Their Relationship to Perceived Dominance and Control

  • Chapter
The Exercise of Power in Communication

Abstract

This chapter reports the findings of over 30 years of research on powerful and powerless speech styles and their relationship to dominance and control. The chapter begins with an explanation of how power, dominance and control can be a perceptual phenomenon. It then analyses the research from a molar perspective, where powerful and powerless speech styles are investigated as whole units, and from a molecular perspective, where the individual language features that constitute a powerful or powerless speech style are studied. These perspectives are used to illustrate how powerful and powerless speech styles are perceived as dominant and controlling, as well as how these styles are implicated in changing the attitudes of message recipients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adkins, Mark and Dale E. Brashers (1995). The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups. Management Communication Quarterly 8: 289–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Areni, Charles S. and John R. Sparks (2005). Language Power and Persuasion. Psychology and Marketing 22: 507–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship, Kevin L. and Thomas Holtgraves (2005). The Role of Different Markers of Linguistic Powerlessness in Persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradac, James J. and Anthony Mulac (1984a). Attributional Consequences of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles in a Crisis-Intervention Context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradac, James J. and Anthony Mulac (1984b). A Molecular View of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles: Attributional Consequences of Specific Language Features and Communicator Intentions. Communication Monographs 51: 307–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradac, James J., John M. Wiemann and Kathleen Schaefer (1994). The Language of Control in Interpersonal Communication. In John A. Daly and John M. Wiemann (eds), Strategic Interpersonal Communication (pp. 91–108). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durik, Amanda M., M. Anne Britt, Rebecca Reynolds and Jennifer Storey (2008). The Effects of Hedges in Persuasive Arguments: a Nuanced Analysis of Language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27: 217–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Bonnie, E. Allan Lind, Bruce C. Johnson and William M. O’Barr (1978). Speech Style and Impression Formation in a Court Setting: the Effects of ‘Powerful’ and ‘Powerless’ Speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14: 266–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fragale, Alison R. (2006). The Power of Powerless Speech: the Effects of Speech Style and Task Interdependence on Status Conferral. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 101: 243–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Pamela, Jon Busch and James J. Bradac (1991). Powerful versus Powerless Language: Consequences for Persuasion, Impression Formation, and Cognitive Response. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 10: 115–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. Paul (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtgraves, Thomas (2002). Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtgraves, Thomas and Benjamin Lasky (1999). Linguistic Power and Persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18: 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosman, Lawrence A. (1989). The Evaluative Consequences of Hedges, Hesitations, and Intensifiers: Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles. Human Communication Research 15: 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosman, Lawrence A., Thomas M. Huebner and Susan A. Siltanen (2002). The Impact of Power-of-Speech Style, Argument Strength, and Need for Cognition on Impression Formation, Cognitive Responses, and Persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21: 361–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosman, Lawrence A. and Susan A. Siltanen (1994). The Attributional and Evaluative Consequences of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles: an Examination of the ‘Control over Others’ and ‘Control of Self’ Explanations. Language & Communication 14: 287–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosman, Lawrence A. and Susan A. Siltanen (2006). Powerful and Powerless Language Forms: Their Consequences for Impression Formation, Attributions of Control of Self and Control of Others, Cognitive Responses, and Message Memory. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 25: 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosman, Lawrence A. and Susan A. Siltanen (2011). Hedges, Tag Questions, Message Processing, and Persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30: 341–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosman, Lawrence A. and John W. Wright, II (1987). The Effects of Hedges and Hesitations on Impression Formation in a Simulated Courtroom Context. Western Journal of Speech Communication 51: 173–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Sik H. (1980). The Social Psychology of Power. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Sik H. and James J. Bradac (1993). Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Influence. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, Sabrena R., Susan A. Siltanen, Lawrence A. Hosman and Jeff Langenderfer (2002). Employment Interview Outcomes and Speech Style Effects. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21: 144–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, John R. and Charles S. Areni (2008). Style versus Substance: Multiple Roles of Language Power in Persuasion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38: 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, John R., Charles S. Areni and K. Chris Cox (1998). An Investigation of the Effects of Language Style and Communication Modality on Persuasion. Communication Monographs 65: 108–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, II, John W. and Lawrence A. Hosman (1983). Language Style and Sex Bias in the Courtroom: the Effects of Male and Female Use of Hedges and Intensifiers on Impression Formation. Southern Speech Communication Journal 48: 137–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Lawrence Hosman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University of Hanover, Germany

    Rainer Schulze

  2. Technische Universität, Berlin, Germany

    Hanna Pishwa

Copyright information

© 2015 Lawrence Hosman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hosman, L. (2015). Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles and Their Relationship to Perceived Dominance and Control. In: Schulze, R., Pishwa, H. (eds) The Exercise of Power in Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478382_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation