Skip to main content
  • 437 Accesses

Abstract

Business firms, along with nation states, are crucial agents in today’s advanced economies. Transnational corporations (TNC) are business firms with activities in more than one nation state,1 and although they are but a small subset of all business firms, they play a dominant role in the world economy. According to UNCTAD (2009), there were some 82,000 TNCs in 2008 owning more than 800,000 foreign affiliates. Ten years earlier, their internal trade was estimated to already account for as much as three-quarters of world exports (UNCTAD, 1999: 232).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, E. & Coughlan, A. (1987). International market entry through expansion via independent or integrated channels of distribution, Journal of Marketing, 51, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions, Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A. & Fosfuri, A. (2000). Wholly-owned subsidiary vs. technology licensing, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in K. Arrow (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 609–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. & Hubbard, T. (2004). Contractibility and asset ownership: On board computers and governance in U.S. trucking, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1443–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., Hennart, J.-F., Slangen, A., & Smeets, R. (2010). Why and how FDI stocks are a biased measure of MNE affiliate activity, Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1444–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaglia, F., Goldstein, A., & Mathews, J. (2007). Accelerated internationalization by emerging markets’ multinationals: The case of the white goods sector, Journal of World Business, 42(4), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J. & Dark, F. (1987). The choice of organizational form: The case of franchising, Journal of Financial Economics, 18, 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. & Casson, M. (1976). The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (1994). Institutional diversity in overseas enterprise: Explaining the free-standing company, Business History, 36(4), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. & Murphy, W. (1976). Franchising: Firms, markets, and intangible assets, Southern Economic Journal, 42, 572–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R., Crookell, H., & Killing, P. (1982). The imperfect market for technology licenses, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 45, 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F. (1984). Choosing between foreign direct investment and licensing: Theoretical considerations and empirical tests, Journal of International Business Studies, 15, 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W. & McFetridge, D. (1984). International technology transactions and the theory of the firm, Journal of Industrial Economics, 32(3), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H. (1977). Technology transfer through commercial transactions, Journal of Industrial Economics, 26, 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H. (1993). The information content of technology transfers: A transaction cost analysis of the machine tool industry, Technovation, 13(2), 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1981). International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1988). The theory of international production, The International Trade Journal, 3(1), 21–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity, International Business Review, 9(1), 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. & Lundan, S. (2008). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdows, K., Machuca, J., & Lewis, M. (2002). Zara. ECCH Case OM 02–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fladmoe-Lindquist, K. & Jacque, L. (2005). To own or to franchise: International control decisions for service companies, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9(3), 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, J., Sternberg, B., & Strongman, J. (1986). Iron Ore: Global Prospects for the Industry. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1977). A Theory of Foreign Direct Investment. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1982). A Theory of Multinational Enterprise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1987). Transaction costs and the multinational enterprise: The case of tin, Business and Economic History, 16, 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1988). Vertical integration in the aluminum and tin industries, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 9(3), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1989). Can the new forms of investment substitute for the old forms: A transaction costs perspective, Journal of International Business Studies, 20(2), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1993). Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy, Organization Science, 4(4), 529–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1994a). International capital transfers: A transaction cost framework, Business History, 36, 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1994b). Free-standing firms and the internalization of markets for financial capital: A response to Casson, Business History, 36(4), 118–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1998). Transaction-cost theory and the free-standing firm, in M. Wilkins and H. Schroeter (eds.), The Free Standing Company in the World Economy. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2000). Transaction costs theory and the multinational enterprise, in C. Pitelis and R. Sugden (eds.), The Nature of the Transnational Firm, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 72–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2007). The theoretical rationale for a multinationality-performance relationship, Management International Review, 47(3), 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2009). Down with MNE-centric theories! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets, Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1432–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2010). Transaction cost theory and international business, Journal of Retailing, 86(3), 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2011). A theoretical assessment of the empirical literature on the impact of multinationality on performance, Global Strategy Journal, 1(1–2), 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2012). Emerging market multinationals and the theory of the multinational enterprise, Global Strategy Journal, 2, 168–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1960). The International Operations of National Firms. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1976). The International Operations of National Firms. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. (1977). The internationalisation process of the firm — A model of knowledge development and increasing market commitment, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2005). Multinationals and Global Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, R., Nygaard, A., & Silkoset, R. (2007). Antecedents and effects of free-riding in the franchisor-franchisee relationship, Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 522–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S., Frazier, G., & Roth, V. (1990). A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets, Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation, Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krafft, M., Albers, S., & Lal, R. (2004). Relative explanatory power of agency theory and transaction cost analysis in German salesforces, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, A., Sayek, S., & Kang, H. G. (2004). Multinational affiliates and local financial markets. IMF Working Paper 04/107. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 783–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litvak, I. & Maule, C. (1977). Transnational corporations and vertical integration: The banana case, Journal of World Trade Law, 11(6), 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. (2002). Competitive advantages of latecomer firms: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies, Asia-Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteverde, K. & Teece, D. (1982). Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry, Bell Journal of Economics, 19, 623–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2009). What have we learned about emerging market MNEs? in R. Ramamurti and J. Singh (eds.), Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 399–426.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. & Singh, J. (2009). Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Read, R. (1986). The Banana Industry: Oligopoly and barriers to entry, in M. Casson and Associates (eds.), Multinationals and World Trade. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. (1981). Inside the Multinationals. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. (2009). Theoretical aspects of MNEs from emerging countries, in R. Ramamurti and J. Singh (eds.), Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servan-Schreiber, J.-J. (1967). Le Défi Americain. Paris: Denoel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, J. (1983). Vertical Integration and Joint Ventures in the Aluminum Industry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (1976). Vertical Integration and Vertical Divestiture in the US Petroleum Industry. Stanford: Institute for Energy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (1981). The multinational enterprise: Market failure and market power considerations, Sloan Management Review, 22(3), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (1999). World Development Report: Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2006). World Investment Report 2006. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2009). World Development Report: Transnational Corporations, Agricultural Production, and Development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vent, G. & Milne, R. (1997). Cost accounting practices at precious metal mines: A comparative study 1869–1905, Accounting History, 2(2), 77–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A. & Greidanus, N. (2009). The end of opportunism vs. trust debate: Bounded reliability as a new envelope concept in research on MNE governance, Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1471–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. (1970). The Emergence of Multinational Enterprise: American Business Abroad from the Colonial Era to 1914. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. (1988). The free standing firm company, 1870–1914: An important type of foreign direct investment, Economic History Review, 41(2), 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. & Schroeter, H. (1998). The Free Standing Company in the World Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1988). Corporate finance and corporate governance, Journal of Finance, 63(3), 567–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P. & Zeng, M. (2009). Chinese multinationals: Emerging through global gateways, in R. Ramamurti and J. Singh (eds.), Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 399–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. & Olsen, C. (1993). From transaction cost to transaction value analysis: Implications of the study of interorganizational strategies, Journal of Management Studies, 30, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Jean-François Hennart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hennart, JF. (2015). A Transaction Cost Theory of the TNC. In: Lundan, S. (eds) Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics