Abstract
On 10 September 2012, after nine years of United Nations (UN) administration and four years of international supervision following the self-proclamation of independence in February 2008, Kosovo celebrated in Pristina the beginning of its full and unconditional sovereign career as a state.1 Yet, and in contradiction to public assertions of sovereignty, more than half of the 193 UN member states refused, as of October 2012, to grant recognition to Kosovo. At the same time, the European Union Rule of Law Mission (EULEX) in Kosovo, the biggest and most expensive European Union (EU) support mission to date, the United Nations Interim Administration Mission (UNMIK), the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and Kosovo Force (KFOR), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) peacekeeping mission were still on the ground. The fragile Kosovar institutions together with the separatist insurgency in the Serbian-dominated North, made security and stability in the region, the original objectives behind promoting Kosovo’s independence, appear to be wishful thinking.
What a beautiful belt you‘ve got on!’ Alice suddenly remarked. ‘At least,’ she corrected herself on second thoughts, ‘a beautiful cravat, I should have said — no, a belt, I mean—I beg your pardon!’ she added in dismay, for Humpty Dumpty looked thoroughly offended, and she began to wish she hadn’t chosen that subject. ‘If only I knew,’ she thought to herself, ‘which was neck and which was waist!’
— Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There (1072)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beardsley, K. (2011) The Mediation Dilemma (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
Berdal, M. and A. Wennmann (2010) Ending Wars, Consolidating Peace: Economic Dimensions (London: Routledge).
Berg, E. (2009) ‘Re-Examining Sovereignty Claims in Changing Territorialities: Reflections from “Kosovo Syndrome”’, Geopolitics, 14, 219–34.
Bloom, M. and R. Licklider (2004) ‘What’s All the Shouting About?’, Security Studies, 13, 219–29.
Burton, J. W. (1996) Conflict Resolution: Its Language and Processes (Lanham: Scarecrow Press).
Coleman, P.T. (2003) ‘Characteristics of Protracted, Intractable Conflict: Toward the Development of a Meta-Framework I’, Peace and Conflict, 9, 1–37.
Collier, P. et al. (2003) Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy, Policy Research Report (Washington: World Bank).
Cornago, N. (2006) ‘Paradiplomacy as International Customary Law: Subnational Governments and the Making of New Global Norms’, in K. G. Giesen and K. Van Der Pijlk (eds), Global Norms in the Twenty First Century (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press), 67–81.
Downes, A.B. (2004) ‘The Problem with Negotiated Settlements to Ethnic Civil Wars’, Security Studies, 13, 230–79.
Fawn, R. (2008) ‘The Kosovo—and Montenegro—Effect’, International Affairs, 84, 269–94.
Fearon, J.D. (2004) ’separatist Wars, Partition, and World Order’, Security Studies, 13, 394–415.
Friedl, D. (2009) ‘Kosovo Negotiations: Re-visiting the Role of Mediation’, International Negotiation, 14, 71–93.
Georgiades, S.D. (2007) ‘Public Attitudes Towards Peace: The Greek-Cypriot Position’, Journal of Peace Research, 44, 573–86.
Grant, T.D. (1999) ‘Defining Statehood: The Montevideo Convention and its Discontents’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 37, 403–57.
Greig, J. M. and P. F. Diehl (2005) ‘The Peacekeeping-Peacemaking Dilemma’, International Studies Quarterly, 49, 621–45.
Hewitt J., J. Wilkenfeld and T. R. Gurr (eds) (2012) Peace and Conflict 2012 (Washington: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland Press).
Horowitz, D. (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley: University of California Press).
International Steering Group (2008) ‘When the Price Is Right the Price Is Right’, http://www.ico-kos.org/?id=61, date accessed 31 June 2014.
Jacobs, M. and P. Khanna (2012) ‘The New World’, New York Times online, Opinionator (22 September).
Kaufmann, C. (1996) ‘Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars’, International Security, 20, 136–75.
Kaufmann, C. (1998) ‘When All Else Fails’, International Security, 23, 120–56.
Kelly, M.J. (1999) ‘Political Downsizing: The Re-emergence of Self-determination, and the Movement Toward Smaller, Ethnically Homogenous States’, Drake Law Review, 47, 209–79.
Ker-Lindsay, J. (2005) EU Accession and UN Peacemaking in Cyprus (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Ker-Lindsay, J. (2009) Kosovo: The Path to Contested Statehood in the Balkans (London: I. B. Tauris).
Kolstø, P. (2006) ‘The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States’, Journal of Peace Research, 43, 723–40.
Lindeman, T. (2010) Cases of War: The Struggle for Recognition (Wivenhoe Park: ECPR Press).
Lindeman, T. and E. Ringmar (eds) (2012) The International Politics of Recognition (Boulder, CO: Paradigm).
Menon, P.K. (1989) ’some Aspects of the Law of Recognition. Part I: Theories of Recognition’, Revue de Droit International (The International Law Review), 67, 161–82.
Merton, R. K. (1936) ‘The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action’, American Sociological Review, 1, 894–904.
Nieminen, K. (2006) ‘The Difficult Equation of Long-Term Peace and Post-Conflict Governance’, Security Dialogue, 37, 263–72.
Popovski, V. and N. Turner (2012) ‘Conclusion: Legitimacy as Complement and Corrective to Legality’, in R. Falk et al. (eds), Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 439–50.
Sambanis, N. (2000) ‘Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War—An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature’, World Politics, 52, 437–82.
UN Good Offices Mission (2014) ‘Helping to Reunify Cyprus’, http://www.uncy-prustalks.org/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=2466, date accessed 31 June 2014.
Verweij, M., M. Douglas, R. Ellis, C. Engel, F. Hendriks, S. Lohmann, S. Ney, S. Rayner, and M. Thompson (eds) (2006) ‘Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World’, Public Administration, 84, 817–43.
Weller, M. (2005) ‘The Self-Determination Trap’, Ethnopolitics, 4, 3–28.
Weller, M. (2008) ‘Kosovo’s Final Status’, International Affairs, 84, 1223–43.
Weller, M. and K. Nobbs (eds) (2010) Asymmetric Autonomy, and the Settlement of Ethnic Conflicts (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).
Weller, M. and S. Wolff (eds) (2005) Autonomy, Self-Governance and Conflict Resolution (London: Routledge).
Williams, P. R. and M. P. Scharf (2003) ‘Resolving Sovereignty-Based Conflicts: The Emerging Approach of Earned Sovereignty’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 31, 349–53.
Wolf, R. (2011) ‘Respect and Disrespect in International Politics: The Significance of Status Recognition’, International Theory, 3:1, 105–42.
Zartman, I. W. (2005) ‘Analyzing Intractability’, in C. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, and P. R. Aall (eds), Grasping the Nettle. Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict (Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press), 47–64.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Georgios Kolliarakis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kolliarakis, G. (2015). Recognition as a Second-Order Problem in the Resolution of Self-Determination Conflicts. In: Daase, C., Fehl, C., Geis, A., Kolliarakis, G. (eds) Recognition in International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137464729_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137464729_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49933-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46472-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)