Skip to main content

Recognition as a Second-Order Problem in the Resolution of Self-Determination Conflicts

  • Chapter
Recognition in International Relations

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

Abstract

On 10 September 2012, after nine years of United Nations (UN) administration and four years of international supervision following the self-proclamation of independence in February 2008, Kosovo celebrated in Pristina the beginning of its full and unconditional sovereign career as a state.1 Yet, and in contradiction to public assertions of sovereignty, more than half of the 193 UN member states refused, as of October 2012, to grant recognition to Kosovo. At the same time, the European Union Rule of Law Mission (EULEX) in Kosovo, the biggest and most expensive European Union (EU) support mission to date, the United Nations Interim Administration Mission (UNMIK), the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and Kosovo Force (KFOR), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) peacekeeping mission were still on the ground. The fragile Kosovar institutions together with the separatist insurgency in the Serbian-dominated North, made security and stability in the region, the original objectives behind promoting Kosovo’s independence, appear to be wishful thinking.

What a beautiful belt you‘ve got on!’ Alice suddenly remarked. ‘At least,’ she corrected herself on second thoughts, ‘a beautiful cravat, I should have said — no, a belt, I mean—I beg your pardon!’ she added in dismay, for Humpty Dumpty looked thoroughly offended, and she began to wish she hadn’t chosen that subject. ‘If only I knew,’ she thought to herself, ‘which was neck and which was waist!’

— Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There (1072)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beardsley, K. (2011) The Mediation Dilemma (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdal, M. and A. Wennmann (2010) Ending Wars, Consolidating Peace: Economic Dimensions (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, E. (2009) ‘Re-Examining Sovereignty Claims in Changing Territorialities: Reflections from “Kosovo Syndrome”’, Geopolitics, 14, 219–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, M. and R. Licklider (2004) ‘What’s All the Shouting About?’, Security Studies, 13, 219–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. W. (1996) Conflict Resolution: Its Language and Processes (Lanham: Scarecrow Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P.T. (2003) ‘Characteristics of Protracted, Intractable Conflict: Toward the Development of a Meta-Framework I’, Peace and Conflict, 9, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. et al. (2003) Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy, Policy Research Report (Washington: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornago, N. (2006) ‘Paradiplomacy as International Customary Law: Subnational Governments and the Making of New Global Norms’, in K. G. Giesen and K. Van Der Pijlk (eds), Global Norms in the Twenty First Century (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press), 67–81.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, A.B. (2004) ‘The Problem with Negotiated Settlements to Ethnic Civil Wars’, Security Studies, 13, 230–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawn, R. (2008) ‘The Kosovo—and Montenegro—Effect’, International Affairs, 84, 269–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J.D. (2004) ’separatist Wars, Partition, and World Order’, Security Studies, 13, 394–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, D. (2009) ‘Kosovo Negotiations: Re-visiting the Role of Mediation’, International Negotiation, 14, 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiades, S.D. (2007) ‘Public Attitudes Towards Peace: The Greek-Cypriot Position’, Journal of Peace Research, 44, 573–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, T.D. (1999) ‘Defining Statehood: The Montevideo Convention and its Discontents’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 37, 403–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig, J. M. and P. F. Diehl (2005) ‘The Peacekeeping-Peacemaking Dilemma’, International Studies Quarterly, 49, 621–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt J., J. Wilkenfeld and T. R. Gurr (eds) (2012) Peace and Conflict 2012 (Washington: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, D. (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Steering Group (2008) ‘When the Price Is Right the Price Is Right’, http://www.ico-kos.org/?id=61, date accessed 31 June 2014.

  • Jacobs, M. and P. Khanna (2012) ‘The New World’, New York Times online, Opinionator (22 September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, C. (1996) ‘Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars’, International Security, 20, 136–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, C. (1998) ‘When All Else Fails’, International Security, 23, 120–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M.J. (1999) ‘Political Downsizing: The Re-emergence of Self-determination, and the Movement Toward Smaller, Ethnically Homogenous States’, Drake Law Review, 47, 209–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ker-Lindsay, J. (2005) EU Accession and UN Peacemaking in Cyprus (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ker-Lindsay, J. (2009) Kosovo: The Path to Contested Statehood in the Balkans (London: I. B. Tauris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, P. (2006) ‘The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States’, Journal of Peace Research, 43, 723–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, T. (2010) Cases of War: The Struggle for Recognition (Wivenhoe Park: ECPR Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, T. and E. Ringmar (eds) (2012) The International Politics of Recognition (Boulder, CO: Paradigm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, P.K. (1989) ’some Aspects of the Law of Recognition. Part I: Theories of Recognition’, Revue de Droit International (The International Law Review), 67, 161–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1936) ‘The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action’, American Sociological Review, 1, 894–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, K. (2006) ‘The Difficult Equation of Long-Term Peace and Post-Conflict Governance’, Security Dialogue, 37, 263–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popovski, V. and N. Turner (2012) ‘Conclusion: Legitimacy as Complement and Corrective to Legality’, in R. Falk et al. (eds), Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 439–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sambanis, N. (2000) ‘Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War—An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature’, World Politics, 52, 437–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Good Offices Mission (2014) ‘Helping to Reunify Cyprus’, http://www.uncy-prustalks.org/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=2466, date accessed 31 June 2014.

  • Verweij, M., M. Douglas, R. Ellis, C. Engel, F. Hendriks, S. Lohmann, S. Ney, S. Rayner, and M. Thompson (eds) (2006) ‘Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World’, Public Administration, 84, 817–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. (2005) ‘The Self-Determination Trap’, Ethnopolitics, 4, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. (2008) ‘Kosovo’s Final Status’, International Affairs, 84, 1223–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. and K. Nobbs (eds) (2010) Asymmetric Autonomy, and the Settlement of Ethnic Conflicts (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. and S. Wolff (eds) (2005) Autonomy, Self-Governance and Conflict Resolution (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. R. and M. P. Scharf (2003) ‘Resolving Sovereignty-Based Conflicts: The Emerging Approach of Earned Sovereignty’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 31, 349–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R. (2011) ‘Respect and Disrespect in International Politics: The Significance of Status Recognition’, International Theory, 3:1, 105–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W. (2005) ‘Analyzing Intractability’, in C. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, and P. R. Aall (eds), Grasping the Nettle. Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict (Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press), 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Georgios Kolliarakis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kolliarakis, G. (2015). Recognition as a Second-Order Problem in the Resolution of Self-Determination Conflicts. In: Daase, C., Fehl, C., Geis, A., Kolliarakis, G. (eds) Recognition in International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137464729_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics