Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Doctrinal Innovation and State Obligations: The Patterns of Doctrinal Development in the Jurisprudence of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

  • Chapter
Human Rights Protection in Global Politics

Part of the book series: Global Issues Series ((GLOISS))

Abstract

When we focus on accountability for human rights abuses, we are likely to follow the path of certain familiar associations. The key issue seems to be how obligations come to be institutionally associated with human rights norms: accountability invites an institutional (and thereby legal) perspective.1 International human rights law looks like the primary framework for specifying exact human rights obligations — especially for State Parties.2 And the most straightforward mechanism for setting specifically legal obligations is the creation of binding legal documents (e.g., by way of multilateral human rights treaties). In this chapter, I will stay focused on the institutional aspects of accountability but I shift the attention to an alternative to drafting treaties: breaking down the normative implications of recognized human rights by way of doctrinal reasoning. This mechanism relies on the normative competence of tribunals or human rights bodies in consolidating innovative ways of interpreting existing legal documents. I seek to contribute to understanding better this ‘doctrinal route’ of specifying human rights obligations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, P. (1987) ‘Out of the Abyss: The Challenges Confronting the New UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 9, 332–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baderin, M. A. (2007) ‘The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,’ in M. A. Baderin and R. McCorquodale (eds.) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. (2007) ‘The United Kingdom and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,’ in M. A. Baderin and R. McCorquodale (eds.) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernier, L. (2010) ‘International Socio-Economic Human Rights: The Key to Global Health Improvement?’ International Journal of Human Rights 14, 246–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilchitz, D. (2002) ‘Giving Socio-Economic Rights Teeth: The Minimum Core and its Importance’ South African Law Journal 119, 484–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilchitz, D. (2003) ‘Towards a Reasonable Approach to the Minimum Core: Laying the Foundations for Future Socio-Economic Rights Jurisprudence’ South African Journal of Human Rights 19, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, D. (2006) ‘Socio-Economic Rights and Courts in South Africa: Justiciability on a Sliding Scale,’ in Fons Coomans (ed.): Justiciability of Economic and Social Rights: Experiences from Domestic Systems (Antwerp: Intersentia).

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (1990) General Comment 2 (‘International Technical Assistance Measures’) UN Doc. E/1990/23(SUPP).

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (1990) General Comment 3 (‘The Nature of States Parties Obligations’) UN Doc. E/1991/23(SUPP).

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (1990) General Comment 12 (‘The Right to Adequate Food’) UN Doc. E/C.12/1999/5.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (1999) General Comment 13 (‘The Right to Education’) UN Doc. E/C.12/1999/10.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (2000) General Comment 14 (‘The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health’) UN Doc. E/C.12/2000/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (2002) General Comment 15 (‘The Right to Water’) UN Doc. E/C.12/2002/11.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (2005) General Comment 18 (‘The Right to Work’) UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/18.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (2007) General Comment 19 (‘The Right to Social Security’) UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/19.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (2001) Poverty and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Statement of the Committee to the Third United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries, UN Doc. E/2002/22-E/C.12/2001/17.

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR (2008) Statement of the Committee on the World Food Crisis, UN Doc. E/C.12/2008/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. R. (1996) ‘A “Violations Approach” for Monitoring the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 18, 23–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. R. (2007) ‘The Status of Efforts to Monitor Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights,’ in S. Hertel and L. Minkler (eds.) Economic Rights: Conceptual, Measurement, and Policy Issues (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, R. R. and Khaliq, U. (2007) ‘Violations of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: The Current Use and Future Potential of the Collective Complaints Mechanism of the European Social Charter,’ in M. A. Baderin and R. McCorquodale (eds.) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranston, M. (1983) ‘Are There Any Human Rights?’ Daedalus 112, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, M. (1998) The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Perspective on Its Development (Oxford: Clarendon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. M. (2008) ‘Socioeconomic Rights: Do They Deliver the Goods?’ I · Con 6, 687–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter, O. (2011) ‘The Rights to Everyone to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress and the Right to Food: From Conflict to Complementarity’ Human Rights Quarterly 33, 304–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, M. J. and Stewart, D. P. (2004) ‘Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Should There Be an International Complaints Mechanism to Adjudicate the Rights to Adjudicate the Rights to Food, Water, Housing, and Health?’ American Journal of International Law 98, 462–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A. (2001) ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Human Rights,’ in A. Eide, C. Krause and A. Rosas (eds.) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A. (1999) The Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The Right to Adequate Food and to be Free from Hunger: Updated Study on the Right to Food, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1999/12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A. (1987) The Right to Adequate Food as a Human Right: Final Report submitted by Asbjørn Eide, Special Raporteur, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1987/23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A., Eide, W.B., Goonatilake, S., Gussow, J., and Omawale (eds.) (1984) Food as a Human Right (Tokyo: United Nations University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, S. (2008) Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, S. (2010) ‘New Horizons: Incorporating Socio-economic Rights in a British Bill of Rights’ Public Law 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. (2001) ‘What We Talk About When We Talk About Indicators: Current Approaches to Human Rights Measurement’ Human Rights Quarterly 23, 1062–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. (2007) The Human Rights Impact of the World Trade Organisation (Oxford: Hart Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, I. E. (2009) Human Rights as Indivisible Rights: The Protection of Socio-Economic Demands under the European Convention on Human Rights (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, J. (2007) ‘Social Rights Litigation in India: Developments of the Last Decade,’ in D. Barak-Erez and A. M. Gross (eds.) Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Künnemann, R. (1995) ‘A Coherent Approach to Human Rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 17, 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, D. (2012) ‘The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement’ Harvard International Law Journal 53, 189–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, T. (2009) ‘Social Science Methods and Human Rights,’ in F. Coomans, F. Grünfeld and M. T. Kamminga (eds.) Methods of Human Rights Research (Antwerp: Intersentia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckie, Scott (1998) ‘Another Step towards Indivisibility: Identifying the Key Features of Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ Human Rights Quarterly 20, 81–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, K. (2006) ‘In Defense of the Constitutional Court: Litigating Socio-Economic Rights and the Myth of the Minimum Core’ American University International Law Review 22, 163–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [1997] http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/Maastrichtguidelines_.html? accessed 10 April 2014.

  • Mechlem, K. (2009) ‘Treaty Bodies and the Interpretation of Human Rights’ Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 42, 905–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meckled-Garcia, S. and Cali, B. (eds.) (2006) The Legalization of Human Rights (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Odello, M. and Seatzu, F. (2013) The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: The Law, Process and Practice (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2006) Frequently Asked Questions on a Human Rights Based Approach to Development Coordination (Geneva: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, M. (2007) ‘Towards Integration of United Nations Human Rights Treaty Body Recommendations: The Rights-Based Approach Model’ in M. A. Baderin and R. McCorquodale (eds.) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, E. (2007) Judicial Review, Socio-Economic Rights and the Human Rights Act (Oxford: Hart Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, A. (2007) ‘Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights’ American University International Law Review 22, 673–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (1989) ‘The Interdependence and Permeability of Human Rights Norms: Towards a Partial Fusion of the International Covenants on Human Rights’ Osgoode Hall Law Journal 27, 769–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepúlveda, M. (2003) The Nature of the Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp: Intersentia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shany, Y. (2007) ‘Stuck in a Moment in Time: The International Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,’ in D. Barak-Erez and A. M. Gross (eds.) Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, D. (1999) Remedies in International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H. (1980) Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H. (1996) Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy (2nd edn, Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H. and A. Philip (2000) International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomuschat, C. (1985) ‘Human Rights in a World-Wide Framework: Some Current Issues’ Zeitschrift für auslandisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 45, 547–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türk, D. (1994) ‘Development and Human Rights,’ in L. Henkin and J. L. Hargrove (eds.) Human Rights: An Agenda for the Next Century (Washington: American Society of International Law).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushnet, M. (2004) ‘Social Welfare Rights and the Forms of Judicial Review’ Texas Law Review 82, 1895–1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twomey, P. (2007) ‘Human Rights-Based Approaches to Development: Towards Accountability,’ in M. A. Baderin and R. McCorquodale (eds.) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bueren, G. (1999) ‘Alleviating Poverty through the Constitutional Court’ South African Journal on Human Rights 15, 52–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bueren, G. (2002) ‘Including the Excluded: The Case for an Economic, Social and Cultural Human Rights Act’ Public Law 456–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoof, G. J. H. (1984) ‘The Legal Nature of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Rebuttal of Some Traditional Views,’ in P. Alston and K. Tomasevski (eds.) The Right to Food (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbogaerde, A. and Vandenhole, W. (2010) ‘The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: An Ex Ante Assessment of its Effectiveness in Light of the Drafting Process’ Human Rights Law Review 10, 207–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Summit Outcome (2005) GA Res. A/RES/60/1 (24 October 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, A. E. (2003) ‘Not Just a Tragedy: Access to Medications as a Right under International Law’ Boston University International Law Journal 21, 325–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. G. (2012) Constituting Economic and Social Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. G. (2008) ‘The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content’ Yale Journal of International Law 33, 113–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mátyás Bódig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Glasgow, UK

    Kurt Mills (Senior Lecturer in International Human Rights) (Senior Lecturer in International Human Rights)

  2. University of Sussex, UK

    David Jason Karp (Lecturer in International Relations) (Lecturer in International Relations)

Copyright information

© 2015 Mátyás Bódig

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bódig, M. (2015). Doctrinal Innovation and State Obligations: The Patterns of Doctrinal Development in the Jurisprudence of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In: Mills, K., Karp, D.J. (eds) Human Rights Protection in Global Politics. Global Issues Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137463173_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation