Skip to main content

Abstract

In this introductory chapter I encapsulate the book’s main message and introduce its purpose, aims and rationale, structure and content, limitations and contributions. I provide definitions of the key concepts of professional learning, critical reflection and action research. I explain the authors’ philosophical and methodological assumptions captured in their preferred methodology of PALAR (Participatory Action Learning and Action Research) within the action research paradigm. I also explain theories that have shaped the action research methodology and the authors’ new vision for action research, in particular, aspects of phenomenology, critical theory, grounded theory, complexity theory, experiential learning theory, living theory, hope theory and negative dialectics. This theoretical integration with critical reflection is intrinsic to identifying the affective-socio-cognitive nature of holistic learning featured in this book. I also identify how the book builds on the authors’ experience and contributes to the literature and towards this new vision of action research that is transformative and holistic in nature and purpose.

What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived.

It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead.

(Nelson Mandela, 18 May 2002)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adorno, T. (1973). Negative dialectics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. (1997). Gesammelte Schriften in zwanzig Bänden. Berlin: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. (2005a). Critical models. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. (2005b). Minima moralia. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. (2006). History and freedom: Lectures 1964–1965. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. (2008). Lectures on negative dialectics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altrichter, H., Posch, P. & Somekh, B. (2000). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research (4th edn). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1992). An aristocracy of everyone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassot, B. (2013). The reflective journal: Capturing your learning for personal and professional development. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, C. (2013). Edmund Husserl. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/phenomenology/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R., Frank, C., Hoyer, K. G., Naess, P. & Parker, J. (Eds) (2010). Interdisciplinarity and climate change: Transforming knowledge and practice for our global future. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birks, M. & Mills, J. (2010). Grounded theory: A practical guide. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockbank, A. & McGill, I. (2006). Facilitating reflective learning through mentoring and coaching. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockbank, A. & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education (2nd edn). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A. & Charmaz, K. (Eds) (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (2005). Staying critical. Educational Action Research, 13(3), 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers, and students. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E. & Charmaz, K. (Eds) (2013). Grounded theory and situational analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd edn). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2013). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. & Sumara, D. (2010). ‘If things were simple …’: Complexity in education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(4), 856–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (2009). Qualitative inquiry under fire: Toward a new paradigm dialogue. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds). (2011). Handbook of qualitative research (4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, B. (2013a). The Cynefin framework, complexity, and action research. Paper presented at ALARA Conversations, Brisbane, 21 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, B. (2013b). Using the Cynefin (Cognitive Edge) ‘Abide’ intervention model with action research. Retrieved from www.aral.com.au/resources/abide.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2002). Responsible research: Ways of being a researcher. British Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. M. & McClintock, J. B. (2013). Promoting hope among youth: Theory, research and practice. In C. Proctor & P. A. Linley (Eds) Research, applications and interventions for children and adolescents: A positive psychology perspective. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • EJOLTS (2014). Commitment and scope. Retrieved from http://ejolts.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1998). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford: Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, B. & Hartman, J. (2013). Rediscovering grounded theory. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (1998). Educational research for social justice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (2009). Action research for/as/mindful of social justice. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds) Handbook of educational action research (pp. 85–98). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. (1990). The paradigm dialogue. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1978). Knowledge and human interest (2nd edn). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2009). Why Adorno? In J. Holloway, F. Matamoros & S. Tischler (Eds) Negativity and revolution: Adorno and political activism (pp. 12–17). London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J., Matamoros, F. & Tischler, S. (2009). Negativity and revolution: Adorno and political activism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (2000). The learning styles helper’s guide. Maidenhead: Peter Honey Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1950). Husserliana: Edmund Husserl — Gesammelte Werke. Dordrecht: Niihoff/Kluver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. D. (2009). Knowledge in the blood: Confronting race and the apartheid past. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols 1 and 2). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1963). A theory of personality. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd edn). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, C. & Scragg, T. (2011). Reflective practice in social work (2nd edn). Exeter: Learning Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edn). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1977). Tätigkeit, Bewusstsein, Persönlichkeit (Action, awareness, personality). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (Ed.) (1952). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, J. (2012). Virtuous mess and wicked clarity: Struggle in higher education research. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(3), 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development (2nd edn). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2008). Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, H. (1999). Thick description and abduction: Paradigm change in social research. Retrieved from www.schulnetz.ch/unterrichten/fachbereiche/medienseminar/paradigms.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. H., Luton, R., Biggs, H., Biggs, R., Blignaut, S., Choles, A. G., et al. (2013). Fostering complexity thinking in action research for change in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 31. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05330–180231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H. S., Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., Hockemeyer, J. R. & Feldham, D. B. (2002). Somewhere over the rainbow: Hope theory weathers its first decade. Psychology Inquiry, 13(4), 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W. (2013). Phenomenology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. At http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. (2011). Introduction to the Cynefin Framework (video). Retrieved from http://cognitive-edge.com/library/more/video/introduction-to-the-cynefin-framework/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, November, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychology Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (Eds) (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd edn). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumara, D. & Davis, B. (2009). Complexity theory and action research. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 358–369). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2012). Wicked issues in situating theory in close-up research. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(3), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. (1989). Creating a living theory from questions of the kind, ‘how do I improve my practice?’ Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. & McNiff, J. (2006). Action research: Living theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (2007). Theodor Adorno. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. (2010). The transformational potential of living theory educational research. Educational Journal of Living Theories, 3, 105–118. Retrieved from http://ejolts.net/node/177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2013). PALAR as a methodology for community engagement by faculties of education. South African Journal of Education, 33(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992a). Professional development in higher education: A theoretical framework for action research. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992b). Action research in higher education: Examples and reflections. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2011). Action leadership: Towards a participatory paradigm. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer International.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.) (2012). Action research for sustainable development in a turbulent world. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. & Teare, R. (2013). Lifelong action learning for community development: Learning and development for a better world. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt, Margaret Fletcher and Judith Kearney

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zuber-Skerritt, O., Fletcher, M., Kearney, J. (2015). Conceptual Framework. In: Professional Learning in Higher Education and Communities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455185_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics