Skip to main content

Kant and Sartre on Temporality

  • Chapter
Comparing Kant and Sartre
  • 471 Accesses

Abstract

Notwithstanding the enormity of his intellectual debt to the German philosophical tradition, Sartre’s remarks concerning Kant are, in Being and Nothingness, more often critical than complimentary.1 Sartre’s antipathy to the Critical philosophy is perhaps especially apparent in his discussion of temporality, where Kant is accused of failing to account either for the ‘order’ of time or for its ‘course’2 Moreover, what must have seemed especially objectionable to Sartre given his pre-eminent concerns with the recognition of human freedom is that, in his view, Kant’s treatment of temporality excludes any possibility of spontaneous agency on our part, and therefore commits us to the denial of our fundamental status as autonomous agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A/B: Kant, I. (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Tr. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prol: Kant, I. (2001) Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science with Kant’s Letter to Marcus Herz February 27, 1772. 2nd ed. Tr. J. W. Ellington. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • BN: Sartre, J.-P. (2005) Being and Nothingness. Tr. H. E. Barnes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, H. (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (2005[1889]) Time and Free Will. Tr. F.L. Pogson. London: Elibron Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, J. (1974) A Commentary on Jean-Paul Sartre’s Being and Nothingness. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. (2006) Sartre: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, M. (2006) Self in the Theoretical Writings of Sartre and Kant: A Revisionist Study. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. (2009) Sartre’s “Being and Nothingness”: A Reader’s Guide. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1997[1929]) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, N. (2002) Sartre. Oxford: One World Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Daniel Herbert

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herbert, D. (2016). Kant and Sartre on Temporality. In: Baiasu, S. (eds) Comparing Kant and Sartre. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454539_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics