Skip to main content

What’s the Matter with MOOCs? Socio-material Methodologies for Educational Research

  • Chapter
Digital Methods for Social Science
  • 2867 Accesses

Abstract

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are fully online programmes of study, usually offering free participation, and often attracting enrolments in the tens or hundreds of thousands. Following partnerships between the prominent MOOC platforms and a number of elite universities, MOOCs have attracted unprecedented media attention and played an unparalleled role in surfacing issues of online education into the ‘mainstream’. In the words of Pappano’s often-cited New York Times article, 2012 was for education ‘the year of the MOOC’ (2012). The dramatic rise in attention was perhaps encapsulated by the UK universities minister David Willets publicizing his support for MOOC partnerships (Coughlan, 2013), and Daphne Koller, head of the US-based MOOC organization Coursera appearing at the G8 Global Innovation Conference (UKTI, 2013). No more simply a trend within the narrow field of educational technology, the MOOC seemed to have become international news. Thus, while critical responses to the MOOC have highlighted the long histories of technological innovation (Logue, 2012), and indeed ‘open’ education (Peter and Deimann, 2013) overlooked in the hyperbole, these high-profile courses have done much to place the ‘online’ at the centre of educational concerns. As the recent report from Universities UK asks, is the MOOC ‘Higher Education’s digital moment?’ (Universities UK, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  • Adams, C., Yin, Y., Madriz, L.F.V. and Mullen, C.S. (2014) ‘A phenomenology of learning large: The tutorial sphere of XMOOC video lectures’, Distance Education, 35(2), 202–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson C. (2008) ‘The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete’, Wired Magazine, http://archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory, date accessed 1 February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T. (2013) ‘Making big data, in theory’, First Monday, 18(10), http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4869/3750.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, d. and Crawford, K. (2012) ‘Critical questions for big data’, Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D. and Seaton, D.T. (2013) ‘Tudying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC’, Research and Practice in Assessment, 8(2), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, S. (2013) ‘UK enters global online university race’, BBC News Business, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24109190, date accessed 9 December 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, M., Kitchin, R. and Zook, M. (2009) ‘How does software make space? Exploring some geographical dimensions of pervasive computing and software studies’, Environment and Planning A, 41, 1283–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., Edwards, R. and Sawchuk, P. (2011) Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Sociomaterial. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. and Edwards, R. (2013) ‘Performative ontologies: Sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning’, European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 4(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, H., Kop, R. and Wiley, D. (2011) ‘The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment’, In First International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. Banff, Alberta, Canada, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2090131, date accessed 3 August 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, D. (2013) ‘The coming big data education revolution’, US News, http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2013/08/15/why-big-data-not-moocs-will-revolutionize-education, date accessed 23 August 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E.C. and Friesen, N. (2013) ‘Online education: A science and technology studies perspective’, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(2), http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/689/363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A.D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D.T, Mullaney, T., Waldo, J. and Chuang, I. (2014) ‘HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses’, in HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1, http://harvardx.harvard.edu/multiplecourse-report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. (2014) ‘Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses’, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H. (2008), ‘Understanding e-learning technologies in practice through philosophies in practice’, in T. Anderson (ed.) The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Edmonton: AU Press, pp.91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., and Schneider, E. (2013). ‘Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses’, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 170–179.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, J. (2013) ‘The limitations of access alone: Moving towards open processes in education technology’, Open Praxis, 5(1), 21–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, J. (2014) ‘Digital culture clash: “Massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC’, Distance Education, 35(2), 164–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logue, A. (2012) ‘Higher Ed disruption: Not so new’, Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2012/10/08/essay-evolving-ideas-about-technology-and-education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, P. and Siemens, G. (2011) ‘Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education’, EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max Mind (2014). GeoIP2 City Accuracy. https://www.MaxMind.com/en/geoip2-city-accuracy, date accessed 10 September 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A. and Margaryan, A. (2013) ‘Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs’, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 149–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOOCs@Edinburgh Group (2013) MOOCs@Edinburgh 2013 — Report #1, https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/6683/1/Edinburgh_MOOCs_Report2013_no1.pdf, date accessed 21 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge to Fix Problems that Don’t Exist. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappano, L. (2012) ‘The year of the MOOC’, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html, date accessed 11 October 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, C. (2013) ‘Mooc completion rates “below 7%”’, Times Higher Education, 9 May 2013. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/mooccompletion-rates-below-7/2003710.article, date accessed 11 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L., Ruby, A., Boruch, R., Wang, N., Scull, J., Evans, C. and Ahmad S. (2013) ‘The life cycle of a million MOOC users’, MOOC Research Initiative Conference, http://www.gse.upenn.edu/pdf/ahead/perna_ruby_boruch_moocs_dec2013.pdf, date accessed 17 February 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, S. and Deimann, M. (2013) ‘On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction’, Open Praxis, 5(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, O. (2013) ‘The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses)’, Open Praxis, 5(1), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saadatmand M. and Kumpulainen, K. (2014) ‘Participants’ perceptions of learning and networking in connectivist MOOCs’, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. V. and Orlikowski, W.J. (2013) ‘Sociomateriality — Taking the wrong turning? A response to mutch’, Information and Organization, 23(2), 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2011) Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen.E. (2009) The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice. Series: Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UKTI (2013) ‘Daphne Koller, Stanford University at Global innovations conference, June 14 2013’, UK Trade and Investment, http://youtu.be/_jPHGwFCrvs, date accessed 1 October 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities UK (2013) ‘Massive open online courses: Higher education’s digital moment?’, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240193/13-1173-maturing-of-the-mooc.pdf, date accessed 11 October 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, M., Mackness, J., Roberts, G. and Lovegrove, E. (2013) ‘Liminal participants and skilled orienteers: Learner participation in a MOOC for new lecturers’, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/waite_0613.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, A. (2013) ‘Student data is the new oil: MOOCs, metaphor, and money’, Hack Education, http://hackeducation.com/2013/10/17/student-data-is-the-new-oil/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, B. (2014a) ‘The end of theory in digital social research?’, DML Central, http://dmlcentral.net/blog/ben-williamson/end-theory-digital-social-research, date accessed 10 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, B. (2014b) ‘New centers of data visualization in education’, DML Central, http://dmlcentral.net/blog/ben-williamson/new-centers-data-visualization-education, date accessed 21 July 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Jeremy Knox

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knox, J. (2016). What’s the Matter with MOOCs? Socio-material Methodologies for Educational Research. In: Snee, H., Hine, C., Morey, Y., Roberts, S., Watson, H. (eds) Digital Methods for Social Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453662_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453662_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55862-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45366-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics