Abstract
When the modern Palestinian national liberation movement emerged in the mid-1960s, its primary aim was to liberate ‘the land and the people’ (‘tahrir al ard wal insan’) from Zionist settler colonialism. Today, with colonization proceeding relentlessly and with Palestinians still dispersed around the world — half of them refugees and mostly deprived of national, civil and human rights — this aim sounds like an embarrassing echo of a distant past.1 That the strategy of armed resistance has failed to deliver any of its goals is arguably clear. Likewise, liberating a fraction of historic Palestine by diplomacy has failed, as proven by the futile negotiations since the Oslo peace process began. By 2011, 20 years after the Madrid Peace Conference, the Palestinian leadership had neither a popular, nor a viable strategy to end Israel’s occupation. Instead, it is faced with an unprecedented legitimacy crisis and internecine political divisions. Amidst this crisis, the Palestinian Authority (PA) has embraced a new strategy to achieve statehood as outlined in its 2009 programme entitled Ending the Occupation, Establishing the State. Enjoying growing international endorsement and professed domestic support, the programme seeks to garner international recognition for a state based on the PA’s progress in neoliberal institution building and good governance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. Ghanem, Palestinian Politics after Arafat: A Failed National Movement, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.
V. Prashad, The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World, New York: New Press, 2008.
P. Bond, Elite Transition: From Apartheid to Neoliberalism in South Africa, London: Pluto Press, 2000;
M. Hart-Landsberg, and P. Burkett (eds), ‘China and Socialism: Market Reforms and Class Struggle’, New York: Monthly Review Press, 2005; and
J. Toporowski, ‘Neoliberalism: The Eastern European Frontier’, in: A. Saad-Filho, and D. Johnston (eds), Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader, London: Pluto Press, 2005.
D. Harvey, A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2005, p. 2.
R. Peet, Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO, London: Zed Books, 2003.
R. Hinnebusch ‘The Politics of Economic Liberalization: Comparing Egypt and Syria’, in: H. Hakimian and Z. Moshaver, The State and Global Change: The Political Economy of Transition in the Middle East and North Africa, Surrey: Curzon, 2001.
H. El-Said, and J. Harrigan, ‘The Economic Impact of IMF and World Bank Programs in the Middle East and North Africa: A Case Study of Jordan, Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia, 1983–2004’, Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 6(2), 2010, pp. 1–25.
K.M. Medani, ‘State Building in Reverse: The Neo-Liberal “Reconstruction of Iraq”’, Middle East Report, Vol. 232, 2004, pp. 28–35.
A. Hanieh, ‘The Internationalisation of Gulf Capital and Palestinian Class Formation’, Capital & Class, February, 35(1), 2011, pp. 81–106;
P. Moore, ‘QIZs, FTAs, USAID and the MEFTA: A Political Economy of Acronyms’, Middle East Report, Vol. 234, 2005, pp. 18–23.
See e.g.: A. Amsden, Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989;
H.J. Chang, Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective, London: Anthem Press, 2002;
R. H. Wade, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
For a fine study comparing the South African and Palestinian liberation movement and decolonization strategies, see M. Younis, Liberation and Democratization: The South African and Palestinian National Movements, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
F. Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993.
J. M. Buchanan, ‘Economics in the Post-Socialist Century’, Economic Journal, 101(404), 1991, pp. 15–21.
S. Samour, ‘Letter to the Editor’, Journal of Palestine Studies, 35(2), 2006, pp. 243–245.
Y. Peled, ‘From Zionism to Capitalism: The Political Economy of the Neoliberal Warfare State in Israel’, in: J. Beinin and R. L. Stein (eds), The Struggle for Sovereignty: Palestine and Israel, 1993–2005, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.
S. Fischer et. al., ‘Securing Peace in the Middle East: Project on Economic Transition’, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994;
World Bank, ‘Developing the Occupied Territories: An Investment in Peace’, Vol. 1–6, Washington DC: World Bank, 1993.
Y. Sayigh, and K. Shikaki, ‘Strengthening Palestinian Public Institutions’, New York: The Council on Foreign Relations, 1999.
S. Hanafi, and L. Tabar, The Emergence of a Palestinian Global Elite: Donors, International Organizations and Local NGOs, Washington DC: Institute for Palestine Studies, 2005.
D. Craig, and D. Porter, Development beyond Neoliberalism? Governance, Poverty Reduction and Political Economy, London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 63–94.
M. Khan, ‘Security First and its Implications for a Viable Palestinian State’, in: M. Keating, et. al., Aid, Diplomacy and Facts on the Ground: The Case of Palestine, London: Chatham House, 2005.
Palestinian National Authority, ‘Ending the Occupation, Establishing the State’, Ramallah, 2009, p. 11.
World Bank, ‘Building the Palestinian State: Sustaining Growth, Institutions and Service Delivery’, Economic Monitoring Report to the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee, 13 April 2011, p. 9.
IMF, ‘Macroeconomic and Fiscal Framework for the West Bank and Gaza: Seventh Review of Progress’, Staff Report for the Meeting of the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee, Brussels, 13 April 2011, p.3.
R. Khalidi, and S. Taghdisi-Rad, ‘The Economic Dimensions of Prolonged Occupation: Continuity and Change in Israeli Policy Towards the Palestinian Economy’, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2009.
See, A. Hanieh, ‘Palestine in the Middle East: Opposing Neoliberalism and US Power’, Socialist Voice, 23 July 2008, http://www.socialistvoice.ca/?p=311 [accessed 15 April 2011];
A. Bryne, ‘Building a Police State in Palestine’, Foreign Policy, 18 January 2011, http://mideast.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/01/18/building_a_police_state_in_palestine [accessed 22 April 2011];
M. Turner, ‘The Power of ‘Shock and Awe’: The Palestinian Authority and the Road to Reform’, International Peacekeeping, 16(4), 2009, pp. 562–577;
R. Ziadah, ‘What Kind of Palestinian State in 2011?’, The Bullet, 2010, http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/339.php [accessed 21 April 2011].
On the issue of policy space and alternative policy recommendations, see UNCTAD, ‘Policy Alternatives for Sustained Palestinian Development and State Formation’, New York and Geneva: UNCTAD, 2009.
K. Rabie, ‘“Palestine is Holding a Party and the whole World is Invited”: Housing Development, Privatization, and State-building in the West Bank’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Geographers, Seattle, 15 April 2011.
International Crisis Group, ‘Ruling Palestine II: The West Bank Model’, Middle East Report No. 79, 2008, p. 22.
E. Harvey, ‘Managing the Poor by Remote Control: Johannesburg’s Experiments with Prepaid Water Meters’, in: D. A. McDonald and G. Ruiters (eds), The Age of Commodity: Water Privatisation in Southern Africa, London: Earthscan, 2005.
C. Cramer, ‘Privatisation and the Post-Washington Consensus’, Centre for Development Policy & Research, SOAS, Discussion Paper 0799, 1999.
N. J. Brown, ‘Are Palestinians Building a State?’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, June 2010.
M. Herzog, ‘The Middle East Security Agenda: An Israeli Assessment’, Paper presented at the Soref Symposium, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Washington, May, 2009.
Israeli troop levels in the West Bank were reported at the end of 2010 to be at their lowest levels since the end of the first intifada. See Anshel Pfeffer, ‘West Bank Sees Lowest IDF Troop Levels Since First Intifada,’ Haaretz, 28 November 2010, http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/west-bank-sees-lowest-idf-troop-levels-since-first-intifada-1.327262 [accessed: 14 July 2011].
Chile under Pinochet provides a telling example to what has been described ‘authoritarian neoliberalism’. To implement radical market reforms and open up the economy for foreign capital, Pinochet destroyed trade unions and opposition movements and persecuted their members. See M. Taylor, ‘Success for Whom? A Historical-Materialist Critique of Neoliberalism in Chile’, Historical Materialism, 10(2), 2002, pp. 45–75;
A. MacEwan, ‘Neoliberalism and Democracy: Market Power versus Democratic Power’, in: Saad-Filho, and Johnston, ibid, 2005.
H. Ibish, and M. Weiss, ‘The Future Palestinian State Takes Root’, The Wall Street Journal, 2 September 2010, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704476104575439441883157542.html [accessed 18 August 2011].
See Mark LeVine’s interview with Karma Nabulsi, Susan Akram and Ingrid Jaradat Gassner ‘Why Palestinians have a Right to Return Home’, Al Jazeera English, 23 September 2011, http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/09/2011922135540203743.html [accessed 29 September 2011].
See draft note written by ‘The Palestine Network’, an initiative with close ties to the PA leadership, 2whttp://uspcn.org/wp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Palestine-Network-Concept-draft-10.pdf. It is noteworthy to point out that this initiative has been heavily criticized by the US Palestinian Community Network in a statement, which can be read at http://uspcn.org/2009/11/20/uspcn-%E2%80%9Cpalestine-network%E2%80%9D-is-a-p-a-attempt-to-divide-the-palestinian-people-and-surrender-their-rights/ [accessed 28.September 2011]. For the relationship between ‘new diaspora strategies’ and neoliberalism, see e.g. F. Ragazzi, ‘Governing Diasporas’, International Political Sociology, 3(4), 2009, pp. 378–379.
R. Khalidi, and S. Samour, ‘Neoliberalism as Liberation: The Statehood Program and the Remaking of the Palestinian National Movement’, Journal of Palestine Studies, 40(2), 2011, pp. 1–20.
Most recently articulated again in S. Roy, Failing Peace: Gaza and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, London: Pluto Press, 2007.
K. Marx, ‘Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law’, in: K. Marx and F. Engels, Collected Works, Vol. 3, New York: International Publishers, 1975, p. 182.
M. Khan, Post-Oslo State-Building Strategies and their Limitations, Transcript of the Yusif A. Sayigh Development Lecture 2010, given at MAS (The Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute), Ramallah, December, 2010.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Raja Khalidi and Sobhi Samour
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khalidi, R., Samour, S. (2014). Neoliberalism and the Contradictions of the Palestinian Authority’s State-building Programme. In: Turner, M., Shweiki, O. (eds) Decolonizing Palestinian Political Economy. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137448750_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137448750_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49658-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44875-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)