Skip to main content
  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

Why should a firm introduce a new product/service, particularly in view of the abysmal failure rate of new products in the market? Regarding the grim picture of failure rates, consider the following: some reports state that the failure rate of new products is between 80% and 90% (Crawford, 1987). However, different studies, depending on the methodology and analytical technique used, report rates between 24% and 98%. According to a report by Cooper and Edgett (2010), top-performing organizations experience a higher commercial success rate for their new products. The average success rate for this group is approximately 62% compared to bottom performers’ average success rate of 45%. Now, what do you think could account for this disparity in success rates? Of course, there could be numerous factors. The authors of the study offer two: (1) top performers have well-structured and applied innovation processes, and (2) they also have better gatekeeping and governance protocols. We can add a few more for this disparity in success rates, such as possibly flawed processes for market research of the need for the products/services, a rush to beat top performers, and/or be the first in the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C. P., and Brantner, V. V. (2006). “Estimating the Cost of New Drug Development: Is It Really $802 Million?” Health Affairs 25, 2 (March/April): 420–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1994). “The High Cost of New Technology,” Successful Farming, Iowa Edition, 92,11 (November): SS8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayus, B. L., Erickson, G., and Jacobson, R. (2003). “The Financial Rewards of New Product Introduction in the Personal Computer Industry,” Management Science 49 (22): 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, P. K., Devinney, T. M., and Winer, R. S. (1991). “The Impact of New Product Introduction on the Market Value of Firms,” Journal of Business 64 (October): 573–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., and Edgett, S. J. (2010). “Developing a Product Innovation and Technology Strategy for Your Business,” Research Technology Management 53 (3): 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. M. (1987). “New Product Failure Rates: A Reprise,” Research Management 30 (4): 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datamonitor (2008). Gillette Fusion Case Study: Developing a US$1 Billion Brand. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, R. A., and Saunders, G. B. (1980). “New Product Announcements and Stock Prices,” Decision Sciences 11 (January): 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J., and Robertson, T. S. (1988). “New Product Preannouncing Behavior: A Market Signaling Study,” Journal of Market Research 25: 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell, G., and Peltzman, S. (1985). “The Impact of Product Recalls on the Wealth of Sellers,” Journal of Political Economy 93 (3): 512–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, R., and Peterson, R. A. (2013). Strategic Marketing Problem: Cases and Comments, 13th ed. New York: Pearson; Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., and Leffler, K. B. (1981). “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,” Journal of Political Economy 89 (August): 615–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koku, P. S. (1994). “The Effect of New Product Announcements and Preannouncements on the Value of the Firm,” Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Rutgers University, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koku, P. S., Jagpal, H. S., and Viswanath, P. V. (1997). “The Effect of New Product Announcements and Preannouncements on Stock Price,” Journal of Market-Focused Management 2: 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., and Keller, K. L. (2009). Marketing Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. T. (1988). “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries,” Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February): 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. T., and Fornell, C. (1985). “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries,” Journal Marketing Research 22 (August): 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G., Carter, T., Gaskin, S., and Mucha, Z. (1983). “Market Share Rewards to Pioneering Brands: Empirical Analysis and Strategic Implications,” Working Paper 1454–83 (Revised in January 1984 ), Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Paul Sergius Koku

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koku, P.S. (2014). New-Product Introduction. In: Decision Making in Marketing and Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444776_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics