Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Retributivist Justice and Dignity: Finding a Role for Economics in Criminal Justice

  • Chapter
Law and Social Economics

Part of the book series: Perspectives from Social Economics ((PSE))

Abstract

Mainstream economics has long struggled with crime, an intrinsically moralized area of law that resists attempts to reduce all goals and motivations within it to considerations of efficiency. Legal philosopher Jules Coleman, in response to an attempt to explain the category of crime in terms of transaction structures, wrote that “such a theory has no place for the moral sentiments and virtues appropriate to matters of crime and punishment: guilt, shame, remorse, forgiveness, and mercy, to name a few. A purely economic theory of crime can only impoverish rather than enrich our understanding of the nature of crime.”1 Without mentioning economics outright, legal scholar Herbert Morris bemoaned an approach to the law that “subordinates principle to the realization of social goals, a mode of thinking that focuses, not upon exculpation of the innocent and conviction of the guilty, that is, upon justice, but upon keeping social disruption at an acceptable level.”2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Acton, H. B. The Philosophy of Punishment: A Collection of Papers. New York: St. Martin’s, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Larry, and Kimberly K. Ferzan (with Stephen Morse). Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, Dan. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: Harper Perennial, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Jennifer A. “Virtue and Behavior.” Review of Social Economy 67 (2009): 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Randy E. “A Consent Theory of Contract.” Columbia Law Review 86 (1986): 269–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Contract Is Not Promise; Contract Is Consent.” Suffolk University Law Review 45 (2012): 647–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaria, Cesare. On Crimes and Punishments. Translated by David Young. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1986 [1764].

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76 (1968): 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “The Economic Way of Looking at Life.” Journal of Political Economy 101 (1993): 385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. The Principles of Morals and Legislation. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1988 [1781].

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John, and Philip Pettit. Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Thom. Punishment. Abington, UK: Routledge, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, Michael T. “Punishment Pluralism.” In Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, edited by Mark D. White, 25–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Retributive Justice in the Real World.” Washington University Law Review 85 (2007): 815–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Jules L. “Crimes, Kickers and Transaction Structures.” In Criminal Justice: NOMOS XXVII, edited by J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 313–328. New York: New York University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. The Practice of Principle: In Defense of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, Robert D. “The Intrinsic Value of Obeying a Law: Economic Analysis of the Internal Viewpoint.” Fordham Law Review 75 (2006): 1275–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Prices and Sanctions.” Columbia Law Review 84 (1984): 1523–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, John. “Varieties of Retribution.” Philosophical Quarterly 29 (1979): 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Michael. “How to Make the Punishment Fit the Crime.” Ethics 93 (1983): 726–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, Richard S., Robert S. Goldfarb, and William B. Griffith. “Economic Man as a Moral Individual.” Economic Inquiry 36 (1998): 645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R. A. Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. “Hard Cases.” Harvard Law Review 88 (1975): 1057–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Charles. Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. W. Property and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994 [1961].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. The Philosophy of Right. Translated by T. M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952 [1821].

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holtman, Sarah. “Justice, Mercy, and Efficiency.” In Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics, edited by Mark D. White, 119–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jane. “Hegel on Punishment.” In Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, edited by Mark D. White, 146–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jolls, Christine, Cass R. Sunstein, and Richard Thaler. “A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics.” Stanford Law Review 50 (1998): 1471–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. James W. Ellington. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1993 [1785].

    Google Scholar 

  • —. The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [1797].

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, Louis, and Steven Shavell. Fairness versus Welfare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. Persons and Values. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Herbert. “The Decline of Guilt.” Ethics 99 (1988): 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Persons and Punishment.” The Monist 52 (1968): 475–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Jeffrie G. “Marxism and Retribution.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1973): 217–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Jeffrie G., and Jules L. Coleman. The Philosophy of Law: An Introduction to Jurisprudence. Rev. ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, Francesco, and Vernon L. Smith (eds). The Law and Economics of Irrational Behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. 6th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “The Economic Approach to Law.” Texas Law Review 53 (1975): 757–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Retribution and Related Concepts of Punishment.” Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1980): 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. “Social Unity and Primary Goods.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams, 159–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, Jeffrey, and Ernest van den Haag. “On the Common Saying That It Is Better That Ten Guilty Persons than that One Innocent Suffer: Pro and Con.” In Crime, Culpability, and Remedy, edited by Ellen F. Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul, 226–248. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, Jesper. The Ethics of Proportionate Punishment: A Critical Investigation. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya, and Bernard Williams. “Introduction: Utilitarianism and Beyond.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams, 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, Cass R. (ed.) Behavioral Law and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “On the Psychology of Punishment.” In The Law and Economics of Irrational Behavior, edited by Francesco Parisi and Vernon L. Smith, 339–357. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Unanimity and Disagreement on the Supreme Court.” Working paper. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2466057.

  • Weinrib, Ernest J. The Idea of Private Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, Alan. “Should Punishment Fit the Crime?” Social Theory and Practice 3 (1975): 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Mark D. “Dignity.” In Handbook of Economics and Ethics, edited by Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren, 84–90. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Kantian Ethics and Economics: Autonomy, Dignity, and Character. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —. The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —. “On Beccaria, the Economics of Crime, and the Philosophy of Punishment.” Philosophical Inquiries 2 (2014): 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Preaching to the Choir: A Response to Fairness versus Welfare.” Review of Political Economy 16 (2004): 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Mark D. “Pro Tanto Retributivism: Judgment and the Balance of Principles in Criminal Justice.” In Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, edited by Mark D. White, 129–145. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Retributivism in a World of Scarcity.” In Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics, edited by Mark D. White, 253–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, Donald. “Punishment as Retribution.” Theory and Decision 4 (1974): 209–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Richard W. “Right, Justice, and Tort Law.” In Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, edited by David G. Owen, 159–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark D. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, College of Staten Island/CUNY, USA

    Mark D. White (Professor and Chair) (Professor and Chair)

Copyright information

© 2015 Mark D. White

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, M.D. (2015). Retributivist Justice and Dignity: Finding a Role for Economics in Criminal Justice. In: White, M.D. (eds) Law and Social Economics. Perspectives from Social Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443762_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation