Skip to main content

Public Opinion on Weibo: The Case of the Diaoyu Islands Dispute

  • Chapter
The Dispute Over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands

Abstract

The century-old dispute between China and Japan over the Diaoyu islands in the East China Sea was rekindled when news of an attempt by the Japanese government to “nationalize” the islands in September 2012 incited strong responses in China. The Chinese government quickly denounced the attempt and refuted Japan’s territorial claim over the islands. Grassroots activists from Hong Kong took the more radical action of landing on the islands, which had been in the effective control of Japan. Yet the agitation, similar to that of previous anti-Japanese popular movements, was most palpable online.1 Infuriated reactions to the news once again took the Internet by storm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Winnie King, Chun-wing Lee, Kai-chi Leung, Shih-diing Liu, Yaling Pan, James Reilly, Sow Keat Tok, Benson Wai-kwok Wong, and Chun Zhang, Online Chinese Nationalism and China’s Bilateral Relations, edited by Simon Shen and Shaun Breslin (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xu Wu, Chinese Cyber Nationalism: Evolution, Characteristics, and Implications (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shih-diing Liu, “Networking Anti-Japanese Protest: Popular Sovereignty Reasserted since 2005,”Online Chinese Nationalism and China’s Bilateral Relations, edited by Simon Shen and Shaun Breslin (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010): 79.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yuezhi Zhao, Communication in China: Political Economy, Power, and Conflict (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas L. Griffiths and Mark Steyvers, “Finding Scientific Topics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, no. Suppl 1 (2004): 5228–5235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xing Wei and W. Bruce Croft, “LDA-Based Document Models for Ad-Hoc Retrieval,” Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM, 2006): 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jonathan Chang, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and David M. Blei, “Connections between the Lines: Augmenting Social Networks with Text,” Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM, 2009): 169–178;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrew McCallum, Xuerui Wang, and Natasha Mohanty, Joint Group and Topic Discovery from Relations and Text (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007); Daniel Ramage, Susan T. Dumais, and Daniel J. Liebling, “Characterizing Microblogs with Topic Models,” ICWSM, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Jianshu Weng, Ee-Peng Lim, Jing Jiang, and Qi He, “Twitterrank: Finding Topic-Sensitive Influential Twitterers,” Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (ACM, 2010): 261–270.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Wayne Xin Zhao, Jing Jiang, Jianshu Weng, Jing He, Ee-Peng Lim, Hongfei Yan, and Xiaoming Li, “Comparing Twitter and Traditional Media Using Topic Models,” Advances in Information Retrieval (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011): 338–349;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Liangjie Hong and Brian D. Davison, “Empirical Study of Topic Modeling in Twitter,” Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics (ACM, 2010): 80–88;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Alan Ritter, Colin Cherry, and Bill Dolan, “Unsupervised Modeling of Twitter Conversations,” Proceeding HLT ’10 Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010, 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sow Keat Tok, “Nationalism-on-Demand? When Chinese Sovereignty Goes Online,” Online Chinese Nationalism and China’s Bilateral Relations, edited by Simon Shen and Shaun Breslin (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Andrew James Nathan and Tianjian Shi, “Left and Right with Chinese Characteristics: Issues and Alignments in Deng Xiaoping’s China,” World Politics 48, no. 4 (1996): 522–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arif Dirlik, “Modernity as History: Post-revolutionary China, Globalization and the Question of Modernity,” Social History 27, no. 1 (2002): 16–39;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arif Dirlik, “Reversals, Ironies, Hegemonies: Notes on the Contemporary Historiography of Modern China,” Modern China 22, no. 3 (1996): 243–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Craig Calhoun, “The Problem of Identity in Collective Action,” Macro-Micro Linkages in Sociology, edited by Joan Huber (Beverly Hill, CA: Sage, 1991): 52.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. R. Nice (Cambridge, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillip C. Saunders, “Legitimacy and the Limits of Nationalism,” International Security 23, no. 3 (1998); Suisheng Zhao, “A State-Led Nationalism: The Patriotic Education Campaign in Post-Tiananmen China,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 31, no. 3 (1998): 287–302; Suisheng Zhao, “Chinese Intellectuals’ Quest for National Greatness and Nationalistic Writing in the 1990s,” The China Quarterly (1997): 725–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Thomas A. Hollihan

Copyright information

© 2014 Thomas A. Hollihan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feng, M., Yuan, E.J. (2014). Public Opinion on Weibo: The Case of the Diaoyu Islands Dispute. In: Hollihan, T.A. (eds) The Dispute Over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Palgrave Macmillan Series in International Political Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443366_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics