Abstract
The philosophy of nature has become virtually an oxymoron for the prevailing philosophical consensus. Reason, we are told, is powerless to conceive what nature is in itself, but it must instead hand over all understanding of physical reality to empirical science. Philosophy may reflect upon how natural science models its data, scrutinizing the consistency of scientific theories and the way research projects are framed, but reason must never go beyond its frail limits to provide a priori ampliative, synthetic knowledge of what holds universally and necessarily of nature. Insofar as the problems of knowing nature a priori apply to any extension of a priori knowledge beyond reason’s knowledge of itself, philosophy should have no aspirations beyond, on the one hand, developing the formal logic of a thinking incapable of generating contents of its own and, on the other, doing “philosophy of science,” finding some regulative, methodological coherence in the endeavors of the empirical sciences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Michael B. Foster argues this point in “Christian Theology and Modern Science of Nature,” part I, Mind, vol. XLIV, no. 176 (October 1935), pp. 439–66.
Immanuel Kant, Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, ed. Michael Friedman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 5 [470].
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 177, A27/B43; p. 185, A43/B60; p. 191, B72.
G. W. F. Hegel, Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller (New York: Humanities Press, 1969), p. 843.
See Edward Halper, “The Logic of Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature,” in Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature, ed. by Stephen Houlgate (Albany: SUNY Press, 1998), pp. 29–49; and Graham Schuster, “The Logic of Realphilosophie — the End of the Science of Logic, Objectivity, and Objective Spirit” (unpublished).
Hegel writes, “Space is simply pure Quantity, only no longer as a logical determination, but as existing immediately and externally. Nature, consequently, does not begin with the qualitative but with the quantitative, because its determination is not, like Being in Logic, the abstractly First and immediate, but a Being already essentially mediated within itself, an external- and other-being.” G. W. F. Hegel, Philosophy of Nature, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), remark to §254, p. 29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Richard Dien Winfield
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winfield, R.D. (2014). The Logic of Nature. In: Hegel and the Future of Systematic Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442383_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442383_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49506-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44238-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)