Skip to main content

Optimal Asset Allocation for European Real Estate

  • Chapter
European Real Estate
  • 190 Accesses

Abstract

The Markowitz theory (Markowitz, 1952) is the standard framework considered in the asset management industry, and the literature has already evaluated the usefulness of these approaches for the real estate industry. Due to the lack of normality of returns, the mean-variance approach used in the Modern Portfolio theory does not work properly in the real estate industry (Cheng and Liang, 2009), and optimal portfolios constructed on the mean-variance framework frequently are suboptimal with respect to other solutions available (Byrne and Lee, 1997).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • V. Agarwal and N.Y. Naik (2004) ‘Risk and Portfolio Decisions Involving Hedge Funds’, Review of Financial Studies, 17, 63–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Burke (1994) ‘A Sharper Sharpe Ratio’, Futures, 23, 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Byrne and S. Lee (1997) ‘Real Estate Portfolio Analysis under Conditions of Non-Normality: The Case of NCREIF’, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 3, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Carretta and G. Mattarocci (2013) ‘Choice of Risk Measure in Evaluating UCITS Funds of Hedge Funds’ in G. Gregoriou (ed.), Reconsidering Funds of Hedge Funds. The Financial Crisis and Best Practices in UCITS, Tail Risk, Performance, and Due Diligence (San Diego: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Cheng and Y. Liang (2009) ‘Optimal Diversification: Is It Really Worthwhile?’, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 6, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Dowd (2000) ‘Adjusting for Risk: An Improved Sharpe Ratio’, International Review of Economics and Finance, 9, 209–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Eling (2008) ‘Does the Measure Matter in the Mutual Fund Industry?’, Financial Analysts Journal, 64, 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Eling and F. Schuhmacher (2007) ‘Does the Choice of Performance Measure Influence the Evaluation of Hedge Funds?’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 2632–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Geltner (1991) ‘Smoothing in Appraisal-Based Returns’, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 327–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Giannotti and G. Mattarocci (2008) ‘Risk Diversification in a Real Estate Portfolio: Evidence from the Italian Market’, Journal of European Real Estate Research, 1, 214–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Giannotti and G. Mattarocci (2013) ‘Risk Measurement Choice in Selecting REITs: Evidence from the U.S. Market’, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 19, 137–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.N. Gregoriou and J.P. Gueyie (2003) ‘Risk-adjusted Performance of Funds of Hedge Funds using a Modified Sharpe Ratio’, Journal of Wealth Management, 6, 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Guizot (2007) The Hedge Fund Compliance and Risk Management Guide (Chichester: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.D. Kaplan and J.A. Knowles (2004) ‘Kappa: A Generalized Down-side Risk-adjusted Performance Measure’, Journal of Performance Measurement, 8, 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Kazemi, T. Schneeweis and B. Gupta (2004) ‘Omega as a Performance Measure’, Journal of Performance Measurement, 8, 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.N. Kestner (1996) ‘Getting a Handle on True Performance’, Futures, 25, 44–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lee and S. Stevenson (2005) ‘Real Estate Portfolio Construction and Estimation Risk’, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 23, 234–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Liu, T.V. Grissom and T.J. Hartzell (1990) ‘The Impact of Market Imperfections on Real Estate Returns and Optimal Investor Portfolios’, AREUEA Journal, 18, 453–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Lizieri and C. Ward (2000) ‘Commercial Real Estate Return Distributions: A Review of Literature and Empirical Evidence’ in J. Knight and S. Satchell (eds), Return Distributions in Finance (Oxford: Butterworths-Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Louargand (1992) ‘A Survey of Pension Fund Real Estate Portfolio Risk Management Practices’, Journal of Real Estate Research, 7, 361–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Markowitz (1952) ‘Portfolio Selection’, Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Mattarocci and G. Siligardos (2013) ‘Real Estate Trends and Portfolio Rebalancing: Evidence from Main European Markets’ in A. Carretta and G. Mattarocci (eds), Asset Pricing, Real Estate and Public Finance over the Crisis (Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Miles and T. Mocue (1984) ‘Diversification in The Real Estate Portfolio’, Journal of Financial Research, 7, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.C.N. Myer and J.R. Webb (1991) ‘Estimating Allocations for Mixed-asset Portfolios Using the Bootstrap Technique’, www.aresnet.org, date accessed 01 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Pagliari, J.R. Webb and J.J. Del Casino (1995) ‘Applying MPT to Institutional Real Estate Portfolios: the Good, the Bad and the Uncertain’, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 1, 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.S. Pedersen and T. Rudholm-Alfvin (2003) ‘Selecting a Risk-adjusted Shareholder Performance Measure’, Journal of Asset Management, 4, 152–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Shadwick and C. Keating (2002) ‘A Universal Performance Measure’, Journal of Performance Measurement, 6, 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.F. Sharpe (1994) ‘The Sharpe Ratio’, Journal of Portfolio Management, 21, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.A. Sortino and H.J. Forsey (1996) ‘On the Use and Misuse of Downside Risk’, Journal of Portfolio Management, 22, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.S. Young (2008) ‘Revisiting Non-normal Real Estate Return Distributions by Property Type in the U.S.’, Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, 36, 233–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.S. Young and R.A. Graff (1995) ‘Real Estate Is Not Normal: A Fresh Look at Real Estate Return Distributions’, Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, 10, 225–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.S. Young, S.L. Lee and S.P. Devaney (2006) ‘Non-normal Real Estate Return Distributions by Property Type in the U.K.’, Journal of Property Research, 23, 109–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Young (1991) ‘Calmar Ratio: A Smoother Tool’, Futures, 20, 40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Gianluca Mattarocci

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mattarocci, G. (2015). Optimal Asset Allocation for European Real Estate. In: Mattarocci, G., Pekdemir, D. (eds) European Real Estate. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137436122_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics