Skip to main content

Once Were Internationalists? Postcolonialism, Disenchanted Solidarity and the Right to Belong in a World of Globalized Modernity

  • Chapter
Reworking Postcolonialism

Abstract

From at least the late 2000s onwards, postcolonial studies has moved into a phase of disciplinary revisionism — a wider trend towards introspection, self-reflexivity and self-transformation that in recent years has produced calls for ‘Reframing Postcolonial Studies’ (Gopal and Lazarus), for ‘Revisioning Post-colonial Studies’ (Mayer), for ‘Rerouting the Postcolonial’ (Wilson, Şandru and Welsh) and for thinking of new directions in ‘Postcolonial Studies and Beyond’ (Loomba et al.) as well as musings on ‘Postcolonial Remains’ (Young) and ‘What Is Left in Postcolonial Studies?’ (Parry). Such a flurry of revisionist activity can be taken as a sign of uneasiness, discontent or possibly even crisis within a field that can look back on an amazing institutional success story of moving from the margins of neglect into the centre of attention in a wide number of academic disciplines and discourses over the last two decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anand, Mulk Raj. Coolie. 1936. New Delhi: Arnold-Heinemann, 1984. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermann, Marshall. All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. 1982. London: Verso, 1983. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Stephen, and Ranka Primorac, eds. Zimbabwe in Crisis: The International Response and the Space of Silence. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Partha. Our Modernity. Rotterdam: South-South Exchange Programme for Research on the History of Development (SEPHIS) and Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA), 1997. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingues, José Maurício. ‘Global Modernization, “Coloniality” and a Critical Sociology for Contemporary Latin America.’ Theory, Culture and Society 26.1 (2009): 112–133. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. ‘Multiple Modernities.’ Daedalus 129.1 (2000): 1–29. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Trans. Constance Farrington. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar, ed. Alternative Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, Peter. The Fear: Robert Mugabe and the Martyrdom of Zimbabwe. New York: Little, Brown, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, Priyamvada, and Neil Lazarus, eds. After Iraq: Reframing Postcolonial Studies. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurnah, Abdulrazak. By the Sea. 2001. London: Bloomsbury, 2002. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. ‘Die Einheit der Vernunft in der Vielfalt ihrer Stimmen.’ Nachmetaphysisches Denken: Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt, Main: Suhrkamp, 1988. 153–186. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric. Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914–1991. London: Abacus, 1995. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggan, Graham. ‘Reading the Readers: Some Thoughts on the Institutionalization of Postcolonial Studies.’ Anglistentag 1999 Mainz: Proceedings. Eds. Sigrid Rieuwerts and Bernhard Reitz. Trier: WVT, 2000. 279–287. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihimaera, Witi. The Uncle’s Story. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2000. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, Neil. ‘“Third Worldism” and the Political Imaginary of Postcolonial Studies.’ The Oxford Handbook of Postcolonial Studies. Ed. Graham Huggan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 324–339. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomba, Ania, Suvir Kaul, Matti Bunzl, Antoinette Burton, and Jed Esty, eds. Postcolonial Studies and Beyond. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Igor, ed. Critics and Writers Speak: Revisioning Post-colonial Studies. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, Scott, and Scott Cutler Shershow. ‘Rethinking Border Thinking.’ South Atlantic Quarterly 106.1 (2007): 39–60. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter D. ‘Delinking: The Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloniality and the Grammar of De-coloniality.’ Cultural Studies 21.2–3 (2007): 449–514. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter D. ‘Preamble: The Historical Foundation of Modernity/Coloniality and the Emergence of Decolonial Thinking.’ A Companion to Latin American Literature and Culture. Ed. Sara Castro-Klaren. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008, 12–32. Print.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, Benita. ‘What Is Left in Postcolonial Studies?’ New Literary History 43.2 (2012): 341–358. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, Peter, Jan-Georg Deutsch, and Heike Schmidt, eds. African Modernities: Entangled Meanings in Current Debate. Oxford: James Currey, 2002. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, P. K. Mulk Raj Anand: A Revaluation. New Delhi: Arnold, 1995. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randeria, Shalini. ‘Entangled Histories of Uneven Modernities: Civil Society, Case Councils, and Legal Pluralism in Postcolonial India.’ Comparative and Transnational History. Eds. Heinz-Gerhard Haupt and Jürgen Kocka. New York: Berghahn, 2009, 77–104. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranger, Terence. ‘Constructing Zimbabwe.’ Journal of Southern African Studies 36.2 (2010): 505–510. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slemon, Stephen. ‘Introductory Notes: Postcolonialism and Its Discontents.’ Ariel 26.1 (1995): 7–11. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Janet, Cristina Şandru, and Sarah Lawson Welsh, eds. Rerouting the Postcolonial: New Directions for the New Millennium. London: Routledge, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaeger, Patricia. ‘Editor’s Column: The End of Postcolonial Theory? A Roundtable with Sunil Agnani, Fernando Coronil, Gaurav Desai, Mamadou Diouf, Simon Gikandi, Susie Tharu, and Jennifer Wenzel.’ PMLA 122.3 (2007): 633–651. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Robert J. C. ‘Postcolonial Remains.’ New Literary History 43.1 (2012): 19–42. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Robert J. C. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001. Print.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Frank Schulze-Engler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schulze-Engler, F. (2015). Once Were Internationalists? Postcolonialism, Disenchanted Solidarity and the Right to Belong in a World of Globalized Modernity. In: Malreddy, P.K., Heidemann, B., Laursen, O.B., Wilson, J. (eds) Reworking Postcolonialism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137435934_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics