Skip to main content

Assessment of Interprofessional Teamwork — An International Perspective

  • Chapter
Leadership and Collaboration

Abstract

This chapter is written on the understanding that there is a need for health professions students and qualified health professionals to be able to practise collaboratively and to deliver team-based health care in the 21st century. In a 2013 set of guidelines for the transformation of health professions education the World Health Organization suggests that ‘building on an approach of global collaborative leadership, efforts that are adaptive and flexible in various cultural and socioeconomic settings will be key to the successful implementation of these evidenceinformed guideline recommendations’ (WHO, 2013, p. 11). Moreover, leadership and good governance are crucial for education reform (WHO, 2013). While interprofessional education (IPE) may facilitate the process of becoming interprofessional, educators are continually challenged by the need to observe and assess teamwork, and learners to provide evidence that they are capable of working in teams. Teamwork is listed as a graduate attribute by many higher education institutions (HEIs), while the accreditation bodies of increasing numbers of the health professions globally are including teamwork and collaborative practice as core standards. Moreover, ‘leadership’ is also frequently included in the list of attributes required of health professionals, while some educators have suggested that ‘followership’ is also an important skill. However, there is a lack of valid and feasible assessment methods for use at the prequalification level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amin, Z. (2012). Purposeful assessment. Medical Education, 46: 4–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, L. E., Waldman, D. A. and Brett, J. F. (2002). Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback. Human Resource Management, 41: 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, L., Nasmith, L., Orchard, C. and Wood, V. (2010). Competencies for interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 21(1): 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P., Amodeo, A. M., Krokos, K. J., Slonim, A. and Herrera. H. (2010). Assessing teamwork attitudes in healthcare: Development of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandiera, G., Sherbino, J. and Frank, J. (eds). (2006). The CanMEDS Assessment Tool Handbook. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, H., Freeth, D., Hammick, M., Koppel, I. and Reeves, S. (2000). Evaluations for interprofessional education. A United Kingdom review for health and social care. London: CAIPE/BERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. and Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.) Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraccio, C., Wolfsthal, S. D., Englander, R., Ferentz, K. and Martin, C. (2002). Shifting paradigms: From Flexner to competencies. Academic Medicine, 77: 361–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIHC (2010). Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative (2010). Available online at: www.cihc.ca/files/CIHC_IPCompetencies_Feb1210r.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • CIHC (2012). An inventory of quantitative tools to measure interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Available online at: http://rcrc.brandeis.edu/pdfs/ Canadiano/o20Interprofessional%20Health%20Collaborative%20report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, K. D., Waite, M. S. and Nichols, L. O. (2003). Organizational structure, team process and future directions of interprofessional health care teams. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 24(2): 35–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couper, I., Worley, P. S. and Strasser, R. (2001). Rural longitudinal integrated clerkships: Lessons from two programs on different continents. Rural Remote Health, 11(2): 16–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, S. M. (2003). Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education, 37: 830–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunworth, M. (2007). Joint assessment in inter-professional education: A consideration of some difficulties. Social Work Education, 26: 414–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. R. and Snell, L. (eds) (2014). Draft CanMEDS 2015. Physician competency framework — Series I. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. and McKenzie, J. (2002). SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: Benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33: 551–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, G., Schmitt, M. H. and Farrell, M. P. (1999). Development of attitudes towards health care teams scale. Evaluation in the Health Professions, 22: 123–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E., Shilkofski, N. A., Stavroudis, T. A. and Nelson K. L. (2007). Simulation: Translation to improved team performance. Anesthesiology Clinics, 25: 301–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, A. K. L., Cooper, J. E., Dean, A., McIntosh, M., Patterson, C. B., Stride, B. E, et al. (2006). Use of a safety climate questionnaire in UK health care: Factor structure, reliability and usability. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(5): 347–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPEC — Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Available online at: www.aacn.nche.edu/educationresources/ipecreport.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. and Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four level model. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, J. R, Holmboe, E. S. and Hauer, K. E. (2009). Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: A systematic review. JAMA, 302: 1316–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M. and Posner, B. Z. (2011). The five practices of exemplary leadership (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levett Jones, T., Lathlean, J., Higgins, I. and McMillan, M. (2008). The duration of clinical placements: A key influence on nursing students’ experience of belong-ingness. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(2): 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, L. (2012). Rethinking competence in the context of teamwork. In B. D. Hodges and L. Lingard (eds), The Question of Competence. Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, S. J. (2012). History and practice of competency-based assessment. Medical Education, 46: 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, E. and Boud, D. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. In D. Boud and E. Molloy (eds), Feedback in higher and professional education. London: Routledge: 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcini, J. J., Blank, L. L., Duffy, F. D. and Fortna, G. (2003). The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138: 476–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R. and Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2: 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrell, J. (2006). Good practice report: Work-integrated learning. Surry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, J. T., Kozmenko, V., Yang, T., Gururaja, R. P., Hilton, C. W., Cohn, C. and Chauvin, S. W. (2009). High-fidelity, simulation-based, interdisciplinary operating room team training at the point of care. Surgery, 145(2): 138–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pant, M. T., Nesargikar, P. N. and Cocker, D. M. (2009). Team Assessment Behavior (TAB) as an assessment tool: A critical evaluation. British Journal of Medical Practitioners, 2: 35–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regehr, G., Macrae, H., Reznick, R. K. and Szalay, D. (1998). Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Academic Medicine, 73: 993–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rethans, J., Sturmans, F., Drop, R., van der Vleuten, C. and Hobus, P. (1991). Does competence of general practitioners predict their performance? Comparison between examination setting and actual practice. British Medical Journal, 303: 1377–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, B., Kaplan, B., Atallah, H., Higgins, M., Lewitt, M. J. and Ander, D. S. (2010). The use of simulation and a modified TeamSTEPPS curriculum for medical and nursing student team training. Simulation in Healthcare, 5: 332–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuwirth, L. W. T. and van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2012). Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective. Medical Education, 46: 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevdalis, N., Lyon, M., Healey, A. N., Undre, S., Darzi, A. and Vincent, C. A. (2009). Observational teamwork assessment of surgery: Construct validation with expert versus novice raters. Annals of Surgery, 249(6): 1047–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, I., Cullen, L. and Fraser, D. (2003). Evaluation of a formative interprofessional team objective structured clinical examination (ITOSCE): A method of shared learning in maternity education. Medical Teacher, 25: 38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Interprofessional Curriculum Renewal Consortium Australia (2013). Interprofessional education: A national audit. Report prepared for Health Workforce Australia. Available online at: www.ipehealth.edu.au/library/content/gateway/ IPE_National_Audit_Report_Australia_2013.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistlethwaite, J. (2013). Practice-based learning across and between the health professions: A conceptual exploration of definitions and diversity and their impact on interprofessional education. International Journal of Practice-based Learning, 1, 15–28. DOI: 10.11120/pb1h.2013.00003

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistlethwaite, J. E., Bartle, E., Chong, A. L. et al. (2013). A review of longitudinal community and hospital placements in medical education: BEME Guide No. 26. Medical Teacher, 35(8): e1340–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thistlethwaite, J. E. and Moran, M. (2010). Learning outcomes for interprofessional education (IPE): Literature review and synthesis. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24: 503–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. J., Sexton, J. B. and Helmreich, R. L. (2004). Translating teamwork behaviors from aviation to healthcare: Development of behavioral markers for neonatal resuscitation. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13 (supplement 1): 157–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, M. A., Nembhard, I. M. and Edmonson, A. C. (2012). Measuring team-work in health care settings: a review of survey instruments: Working paper. New Haven: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. L., Gordon, E, Marshall, M., Wilson, F. and Hunt, T. (2005). Interprofessional capability a developing framework for interprofessional education. Nurse Education in Practice, 4: 230–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wageman, R. J., Hackman, R. and Lehman, E. (2005). Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4): 373–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2013). Transforming and scaling up health professionals’ education and training. World Health Organization Guidelines2013. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, H. I., Mytton, O. T., Lemar, C., Yardley, I. E., Ellis, B. M., Rutter, P. D. et al. (2010). What have we learned about interventions to reduce medical errors? Annual Review of Public Health, 31: 479–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Word, L., Hassell, A., Whitehouse, A., Bullock, A. and Wall, D. (2006). A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to ten tips for their successful design. Medical Teacher, 28: 185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Jill Thistlethwaite

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thistlethwaite, J. (2015). Assessment of Interprofessional Teamwork — An International Perspective. In: Forman, D., Jones, M., Thistlethwaite, J. (eds) Leadership and Collaboration. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137432094_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics