Skip to main content

Presuming Communicative Competence with Children with Autism: A Discourse Analysis of the Rhetoric of Communication Privilege

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Child Mental Health

Abstract

In this chapter, I explore how parents and therapists negotiate the meaning of communication with minimally and non-verbal children with autism. Specifically, I share findings from a study of the interactions of children with autism and their parents and therapists. This study was situated within a discursive psychology framework (Edwards & Potter, 1992; Potter & Wetherell, 1987) and informed by critical notions of disability (Oliver, 1996; Thomas, 1999), critical perspectives on communication (Biklen et al., 2005; Biklen & Burke, 2006), and certain aspects of conversation analysis (Sacks, 1992).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd edition). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2014). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edition). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F. G., & Selesnick, S. T. (1966). The history of psychiatry: An evaluation of psychiatric thought and practice from prehistoric times to the present. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, C. E., & Causton-Theoharis, J. N. (2009). Disqualified in the human race: A close reading of the autobiographies of individuals identified as autistic. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(5), 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, D., Attfield, R., Bissonnette, L., Blackman, L., Burke, J., Frugone, A., Mukhopadhyay, R. R., & Rubin, S. (2005). Autism and the myth of the person alone. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, D., & Burke, J. (2006). Presuming competence. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(2), 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1976). The judged, not the judges: An insider’s view of mental retardation. American Psychologist, 31, 47–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, G. (1989). The normal and the pathological. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P., & Toerien, M. (2011). An introduction to the methods of conversation analysis (short course on conversation analysis). York, UK: University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D. B. (1977). Homo loquens: Man as a talking animal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 233–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, B. (1999). The constitution of impairment: Modernity and the aesthetic of oppression. Disability & Society, 14(2), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In P. Bull & R. Derek (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 166–196). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, L. (1943/1985). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. In A. M. Donnellan (Ed.), Classic readings in autism (pp. 11–50). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N. (2011). The discursive construction of autism: Contingent meanings of autism and therapeutic talk. Unpublished dissertation: University of Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N. (2012). Researching the discursive function of silence: A reconsideration of the normative communication patterns in the talk of children with autism labels. In G. S. Cannella & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Critical qualitative research reader (pp. 329–340). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N. (2014). Negotiating the abnormality/normality binary: A discursive psychological approach to the study of therapeutic interactions and children with autism. Qualitative Psychology, 1(2), 178–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N. (2015). Leveraging two computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software packages to support discourse analysis. In S. Hai-Jew (Ed.), Enhancing qualitative and mixed methods research with technology (pp. 194–209). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N., & Barouch, A. (2013). Inviting the assent of children described as functionally nonverbal. In I. Paoletti, A. Duarte, I. Tomas, & F. Menéndez (Eds.), Practices of ethics: An empirical approach to ethics in social science research (pp. 65–84). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N., & Paulus, T. M. (2014). ‘That teacher takes everything badly’: Discursively reframing non-normative behaviors in therapy sessions. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(5), 641–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewiecki-Wilson, C. (2003). Rethinking rhetoric through mental disabilities. Rhetoric Review, 22(2), 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, T. R. (2011). How can I talk if my lips don’t move? Inside my autistic mind. New York: Arcade Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadesan, M. H. (2005). Constructing autism: Unraveling the ‘truth’ and understanding the social. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadesan, M. H. (2008). Constructing autism: A brief genealogy. In M. Osteen (Ed.), Autism and representation (pp. 78–95). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noblit, G. W. (1999). Particularities: Collected essays on ethnography and education. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E., Schieffelin, B., & Platt, M. (1979). Propositions across utterances and speakers. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 251–268). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1996). A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology? In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society (pp. 18–42). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osteen, M. (2008). Autism and representation: A comprehensive introduction. In M. Osteen (Ed.), Autism and representation (pp. 1–47). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patersen, K., & Hughes, B. (1999). Disability studies and phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life. Disability & Society, 14(5), 597–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentenbach, B. (2009). Synergy. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti, Z., Ashby, C., Arndt, K., Chadwick, M., & Kasahara, M. (2008). ‘I like others to not try to fix me:’ Agency, independence, and autism. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(5), 364–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (1992). Bridging the gaps: An inside-out view of autism (or, do you know what I don’t know?). In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), High-functioning individuals with autism (pp. 294–302). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickenden, M. (2011). Whose voice is that?: Issues of identity, voice and representation arising in an ethnographic study of the lives of disabled teenagers who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(4), Retrieved from: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1724/1772.

  • Wolff, S. (2004). The history of autism. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(4), 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Recommended reading

  • • Biklen, D., Attfield, R., Bissonnette, L., Blackman, L., Burke, J., Frugone, A., Mukhopadhyay, R. R., & Rubin, S. (2005). Autism and the myth of the person alone. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • • Lester, J. N. (2012). Researching the discursive function of silence: A reconsideration of the normative communication patterns in the talk of children with autism labels. In G. S. Cannella & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Critical qualitative research reader (pp. 329–340). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • • Rossetti, Z., Ashby, C., Arndt, K., Chadwick, M., & Kasahara, M. (2008). ‘I like others to not try to fix me:’ Agency, independence, and autism. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(5), 364–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Jessica Nina Lester

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lester, J.N. (2015). Presuming Communicative Competence with Children with Autism: A Discourse Analysis of the Rhetoric of Communication Privilege. In: O’Reilly, M., Lester, J.N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Child Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137428318_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics