Abstract
In line with the multi-disciplinary tenor of this volume, my aim in this Introduction is to weave between historiographical traditions that are often kept apart, focusing on the understandings that are generated when they are brought together. Imperial history has a longer and, some would say, more venerable tradition than environmental history, but this volume suggests that more explicit attention to their interpenetration might be worthwhile.1 Both, in particular, are beginning to share certain spatial conceptions of networks, space and place; conceptions that also characterise recent histories of science and historical geographies. These more relative spatial conceptions lend themselves particularly to histories of knowledge, of cultural contact and trade, of botanical and artistic exchange, of shifting environmental management regimes, and of medicine, in which human and nonhuman entities combine to form dynamic assemblages. The East India Company itself was one such assemblage, constituted as much by the commodities, specimens and artefacts, and the regimes of knowledge that it shifted around and beyond the Indian Ocean as by the merchants, sailors, lascars, officials, bureaucrats and ships that sustained their movements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A more general and extensive treatment of ideas of space in imperial history writing is A. Lester (2013), ‘Spatial Concepts and the Historical Geographies of British Colonialism’, in A. Thompson (ed.) Writing Imperial Histories. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 118–42.
F. Mort (1987), Dangerous Sexualities: Medico-Moral Politics in England since 1830. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, quoted by
R. Phillips (2006), Sex, Politics and Empire: A Postcolonial Geography. Manchester: Manchester University Press, p. 6;
A. Burton (2011), Empire in Question: Reading, Writing and Teaching British Imperialism. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, pp. 14–15.
J. MacKenzie (1989), Imperialism and Popular Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press;
S. Howe (ed.) (2010), The New Imperial Histories Reader. London and New York: Routledge.
C. Hall (1992), White, Male and Middle Class: Explorations in Feminism and History. London: Routledge;
C. Hall (2002) Civilising Subjects: Metropole and Colony in the English Imagination 1830–1867. Cambridge: Verso;
K. Wilson (2004), A New Imperial History: Culture, Identity and Modernity in Britain and the Empire, 1660–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
A. Burton (1994), Burdens of History: British Feminists, Indian Women and Imperial Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press;
S. Marks (1990) ‘History, the Nation and Empire: Sniping from the Periphery’, History Workshop Journal, 29(1): 111–19.
R. Grove (1996), Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. More recently, see
H. Cook (2008), Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press;
K. Raj (2010), Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and the Construction of Knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650–1900. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, and
S. Sivasundaram (2013), Islanded: Britain, Sri Lanka, and the Bounds of an Indian Ocean Colony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
D. Massey (1995), ‘Places and Their Pasts’, History Workshop Journal, 39: 186.
F. Driver and R. Samuel (1995) ‘Rethinking The Idea of Place’, History Workshop Journal, 39: vi.
In fiction see A. Ghosh (2009), Sea of Poppies. London: John Murray, and (2012), River of Smoke. London: Picador, and among historians, for example,
K. McPherson (1998), The Indian Ocean: A History of People and The Sea. Delhi: Oxford University Press;
T. Mecalf (2008), Imperial Connections: India in the Indian Ocean Arena, 1860–1920. Berkeley: University of California Press; and most recently,
S. Amrith (2013), Crossing the Bay of Bengal: The Furies of Nature and the Fortunes of Migrants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
T. Ballantyne (2002), Orientalism and Race: Aryanism in the British Empire. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
J. Beattie (2012), ‘Recent Themes in the Environmental History of the British Empire’, History Compass, 10(2): 131.
B. Latour (2007), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
E. Pawson (2008), ‘Plants, Mobilities and Landscapes: Environmental Histories of Botanical Exchange’, Geography Compass, 2(5): 1466.
Beattie, ‘Recent Themes’, 131–3, citing D. Lambert and A. Lester (eds.) (2006), Colonial Lives Across the British Empire: Imperial Careering in the Long Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beattie, ‘Recent Themes’, 131–3; R. Drayton (2000), Nature’s Government: Science, British Imperialism and the Improvement of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press. My emphasis.
See also K. Ward (2012), Networks of Empire: Forced Migration in the Dutch East India Company. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Something that was necessary, for instance, to write. A. Lester (2002) ‘British Settler Discourse and the Circuits of Empire’, History Workshop Journal, 54: 27–50.
L. Paterson (2006), Colonial Discourses: Nuipepa Māori 1855–1863. Dunedin: University of Otago Press;
E. Elbourne (2005), ‘Indigenous Peoples and Imperial Networks in the Early Nineteenth Century: The Politics of Knowledge’, in P. Buckner and R. Douglas Francis (eds.) Rediscovering the British World. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, pp. 59–86,
R. Ross (1999), Status and Respectability in the Cape Colony, 1750–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 156.
Ward, Networks of Empire; C. Anderson (2012), Subaltern Lives: Biographies of Colonialism in the Indian Ocean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
For a valiant effort to track an individual ‘subaltern’ who appeared only once and fleetingly in the colonial archive, see C. Van Onselen (1996), The Seed is Mine. New York: Hill and Wang. See also
J. Carey and J. Lydon (eds.) (2014), Indigenous Networks: Mobility, Connections and Exchange. London: Routledge.
M. Stevens (2009), ‘Mutonbirds and Modernity in Murihiku: Continuity and Change in Kai Tahu Knowledge’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Otago.
See D. Kumar, V. Damodaran and Rohan D’Souza (eds.) (2011), The British Empire and the Natural World: Environmental Encounters in South Asia. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
D. Massey (2005), For Space. London: Sage.
S. Legg (2009), ‘Of Scales, Networks and Assemblages: The League of Nations Apparatus and the Scalar Sovereignty of the Government of India’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(2): 238.
J. P. Jones III, K. Woodward and S. A. Marston (2007), ‘Situating Flatness’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(2): 271.
L. P. Chester (2009), Borders and Conflict in South Asia: The Radcliffe Boundary Commission and the Partition of the Punjab. Manchester: Manchester University Press, p. 235.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Alan Lester
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lester, A. (2015). Introduction: New Imperial and Environmental Histories of the Indian Ocean. In: Damodaran, V., Winterbottom, A., Lester, A. (eds) The East India Company and the Natural World. Palgrave Studies in World Environmental History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427274_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427274_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49109-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-42727-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)