Skip to main content

Why and How a Teacher Union Supports Autonomous Teacher Professional Development in an Age of New Managerialism

  • Chapter
Teacher Unions in Public Education

Abstract

There are five visibly current trends in the literature on teachers’ professionallearning, some dominant and others competing in specificjurisdictions:

  • a push for greater alignment of teachers’ professional learning with managerial and system goals

  • system support for teachers’ professional learning through governmentfunding but with less managerial control—perhaps epitomizedin Canada by the (now defunct) Alberta Initiative for SchoolImprovement

  • the creation of standards of professional learning such as those producedand promoted by Learning Forward the former National StaffDevelopment Council (NSDC)

  • dichotomous approaches to professional learning communities—somelargely prescribed and others more organic and self-organizing

  • the promotion of collaborative and autonomous professional learningin which teachers as professionals engage in inquiry and otherself-directed approaches, which has built on the legacy of actionresearch

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • British Columbia Teachers’ Federation. 2008. Teacher inquiry in the BCTF: A focus for supporting teachers’ professional development. Vancouver: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, Suzanne, Joanne Deppeler, and Julianne Moss. 2010.“Cultivating teachers’ beliefs, knowledge and skills for leading change in schools.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 35 (1): 1—13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, Marilyn, and Susan Lytle. 2009.“Teacher research as stance.” In The Sage Handbook of Educational Research, edited by Susan Noffke and Bridget Somekh, 39–49. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, David. 2002.“Creating common and uncommon worlds: Using discourse ethics to decide public and private in classrooms.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 34 (1): 25—42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, Nancy Fichtman, and Diane Hoppey. 2009. The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, Terry. 2003. After theory. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, Lois Brown (ed.). 2008. Powerful designs for professional learning. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, Richard. 2007.“Short on power, long on responsibility.” Educational Leadership 65 (1): 20—25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leana, Carrie. 2011.“The missing link in school reform.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 22(1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, Laura, and Bruce Wellman. 2003. Mentoring matters: A practical guide to learning-focused relationships, 2nd ed. Sherman, CT: MiraVia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, Charlie. 2002. Reconciling teacher unionism’s disparate identities: A view from the field. Vancouver: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, Charlie. 2011a. The rights and responsibilities of teacher professional autonomy: A BCTF discussion paper. Vancouver: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, Charlie. 2011b. Professional development/professional growth and engagement: What’s wrong with the BCPSEA picture? Vancouver: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, Charlie. 2011c. The rights and responsibilities of teacher professional autonomy: A BCTF discussion paper. Vancouver: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, Charlie, Theresa Fry, and Mary Filleul. 2012.“The catalytic and collaborative role of a Canadian teacher union.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, Alice, and Anne Phelan. 2008.“Paradoxes of autonomy in professional life.” Changing English 15 (2): 189—97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randi, Judi, and Kenneth Zeichner. 2004.“New visions of teacher professional development.” In Developing the teacher workforce: 103rdyearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part 1, edited by Mark Smylie and Debra Miretzky. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Marian. 2010.“School perspectives on collaborative inquiry.” Paper presented at the Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Wright, Ann. 2009.“Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning.” Review of Educational Research 79 (2): 702–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Nina Bascia

Copyright information

© 2015 Nina Bascia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naylor, C. (2015). Why and How a Teacher Union Supports Autonomous Teacher Professional Development in an Age of New Managerialism. In: Bascia, N. (eds) Teacher Unions in Public Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426567_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics