Abstract
This chapter offers an empirically rich analysis of violence, reform, and negotiations characterizing the Kurdish question in Turkey during the Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi (AKP) rule. It is organized as three sections. The first section offers an analysis of violence on the basis of a new events dataset. A military stalemate has ensued between the two centralized and disciplined political entities with opposing ideological visions. The Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) pursues a classical “war of attrition” with the goal of achieving substantial concessions from the Turkish state. In response, the Turkish state pursued a mixed strategy of concessions and punishments to erode public support for the insurgency. While both sides try to maximize their power consistent with a realist perspective, the dynamics of electoral competition and public opinion complicates their strategies. The following section discusses the electoral dynamics, the negotiation attempts, and the reforms of the AKP. It demonstrates that there is a strong negative correlation between the scope and intensity of violence and the continuation of negotiations. However, the negotiations are not effective in bridging the gap between the demands of the insurgents and the expectations of the Turkish state. The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of the literature on negotiated settlements to civil wars to identify the challenges to the peaceful resolution of the Kurdish question in Turkey.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Lotta Themnér and Peter Wallensteen, “Armed Conflict, 1946–2012,” Journal of Peace Research 50.4 (2013), pp. 509–521.
James Fearon and David Laitin, “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War,” American Political Science Review 97.1 (2003), pp. 75–90.
İsmet İmset, The PKK: A Report on Separatist Violence, 1973–1992, Ankara: Turkish Daily News, 1992.
Kemal Kirişçi and Gareth M. Winrow, The Kurdish Question and Turkey: An Example of Trans-State Ethnic Conflict (London: Frank Cass, 1997), p. 142.
David McDowall, A Modern History of the Kurds (London: I.B. Tauris, 1996), p. 442.
US Department of State, “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Turkey” (1999), http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/1999/365.htm, accessed on January 30, 2014.
Hasan Kundakçı, “Güneydoğu’da Unutulmayanlar” (İstanbul: Alfa, 2004), p. Xv.
Hasan Cemal, Kürtler (İstanbul: Doğan, 2003), p. 550.
Gerardo Rénique, “People’s War, ‘Dirty War’: Cold War Legacy and the End of History in Postwar Peru” (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010).
Stathis N. Kalyvas, “Wanton and Senseless?: The Logic of Massacres in Algeria,” Rationality and Society 11.3 (1999), pp. 243–285.
Gordon Weiss, The Cage: The Fight for Sri Lanka and the Last Days of the Tamil Tigers (New York: Bellevue Literay Press, 2012).
Robert P. Clark, The Basque Insurgents: ETA, 1952–1980 (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1984), p. 126.
Stephen J. Stedman, “Spoiler Problems in Peace Process,” International Security 22.2 (1997), pp. 5–53.
Andrew H. Kydd and Barbara F. Walter, “The Strategies of Terrorism,” International Security 31.1 (2006), pp. 49–80.
Firat Cengiz and Lars Hoffman, “Rethinking Conditionality: Turkey’s European Union Accession and the Kurdish Question,” Journal of Common Market Studies 51.3 (2013), pp. 416–432.
Güneş M. Tezcur, “When Democratization Radicalizes: The Kurdish Nationalist Movement in Turkey,” Journal of Peace Research 47.6 (2010), pp. 775–789.
Stathis N. Kalyvas, “Ethnic Defection in Civil War,” Comparative Political Studies 41.8 (2008), pp. 1043–1068.
Güneş M. Tezcür, Muslim Reformers in Iran and Turkey: The Paradox of Moderation (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2010).
Jack Snyder, From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict (New York: Norton, 2000).
Nicholas Sambanis, Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl, and Moses Shayo, “Parochialism as a Central Challenge in Counterinsurgency,” Science 336 (2012), pp. 805–808.
Jason Lyall, Kosuke Imai, and Graeme Blair, “Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan,” American Political Science Review 107.4 (2013), pp. 679–705.
Luke N. Condra and Jacob N. Shapiro, “Who Takes the Blame? The Strategic Effects of Collateral Damage,” American Journal of Political Science 56.1 (2012), pp. 167–187.
Ceren Belge, “Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey,” Law and Society Review 40.3 (2006): 653–692.
David E. Cunningham, “Veto Players and Civil War Duration,” American Journal of Political Science 50.4 (2006): 875–892.
Fikret Bila, Komutanlar Cephesi (İstanbul: Doğan, 2010).
Güneş M. Tezcür, “Prospects for Resolution of the Kurdish Question: A Realist Perspective,” Insight Turkey, 15.2 (2013), pp. 69–84.
Julian Wucherpfenning, Nils W. Metternich, Lars-Erik Cederman, and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, “Ethnicity, the State, and the Duration of Civil War,” World Politics, 64.1 (2012), pp. 79–115.
Barbara Walter, “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement,” International Organization 51.3 (1997), pp. 335–364.
Monica Duffy Toft, “Ending Civil Wars? A Case for Rebel Victory?” International Security 34 (Spring 2010), pp. 7–36.
Dawn Brancati, “Decentralization: Fueling the Fire or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism?” International Organization 60 (2006), pp. 651–685.
Metin Heper, The State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation (Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
Şener Aktürk, Regimes of Ethnicity and Natinhood in Germany, Russia, and Turkey (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Güneş M. Tezcür and Mehmet Gurses, “Who Governs? Ethnic and Regional Roots of Political Power in Turkey,” Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Nationalities Convention, New York, 2014.
Lars-Erik Cederman, Andreas Wimmer, and Brian Min, “Why Do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis,” World Politics 62.1 (2010), pp. 87–119.
Andreas Wimmer, Waves of War: Nationalism, State Formation, and Ethnic Exclusion in the Modern World (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Julian Wucherpfenning, Nils W. Metternich, Lars-Erik Cederman, and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, “Ethnicity, the State, and the Duration of Civil War,” World Politics 64.1 (2012), pp. 79–115.
Johanna Kristin Birnir, Ethnicity and Electoral Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Amy H. Liu and Jacob I. Ricks, “Coalions and Language Politics: Policy Shifts in Southeast Asia,” World Politics 64.3 (2012), pp. 476–506.
Mehmet Gurses and T. David Mason, “Democracy Out of Anarchy: The Prospects for Post-Civil-War Democracy,” Social Science Quarterly 89 (June 2008), pp. 315–336.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 David Romano and Mehmet Gurses
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tezcür, G.M. (2014). The Ebb and Flow of Armed Conflict in Turkey: An Elusive Peace. In: Romano, D., Gurses, M. (eds) Conflict, Democratization, and the Kurds in the Middle East. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409997_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409997_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48887-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40999-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)