Abstract
Children witnessing violence at home is regarded in many countries as one of society’s most important social and health problems (e.g. Feerick and Silverman, 2006). In Sweden, the special needs of children subjected to such violence have been in focus since the end of the 1990s (Eriksson, 2005; Øverlien and Hydén, 2009), and the problem has been an urgent matter for the Child Protection Services (CPS). Child welfare organizations have been involved in identifying and responding to such violence and its consequences (The National Board of Health and Welfare 2011; Grip, 2012). In Sweden, as in other countries, the work of CPS is based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child, in terms of the child’s perspective, protection, support and rights (Santos Pais and Bissell, 2006).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Alderson, S. and Westmarland, N. (2013). The need for accountability to, and support for, children of men on domestic violence perpetrator programs. Child Abused Review, 22: 182–193.
Annerbäck, E.-M., Wingren, G., Svedin, C.G. and Gustafsson, P.A. (2010). Prevalence and characteristics of child psychical abuse in Sweden — A finding from a population based youth survey. Acta Paediarica, 99: 1229–1236.
Bacchi, C.L. (1999). Women, Policy and Politics — The Construction of Policy Problems. London: Sage.
Bacchi, C.L. (2009). Analysing Policy. What’s the Problem Represented to Be? French Forest, NSW: Pearson.
Bailey, A.M. (2013). Prioritizing child’s safety as the prime best factor. Family Law Quarterly, 47: 35–64.
Coohey, C. (2007). What criteria do child protective services investigators use to substantive exposure to domestic violence. Child Welfare, 86: 93–122.
Douglas, H. and Walsh, T. (2010). Mothers, domestic violence and child protection. Violence Against Women, 24: 489–508.
Eriksson, M. (2005). A visible or invisible child. Professional’s approach to children whose father is violent towards their mother. In Eriksson, M., Hester, M., Keskinen, S. and Pringle, K. (eds.). Tackling Men’s Violence in Families: Nordic Issues and Dilemmas. Bristol: Policy Press.
Eriksson, M. and Näsman, E. (2008). Participation in family law proceedings for children whose father is violent to their mother. Childhood, 15: 59–275.
Fairtlough, A. (2006). Social work with children affected by domestic violence. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 6: 25–47.
Featherstone, B., White, S. and Morris, K. (2014). Reimaging Child Protection. Towards Humane Social Work Families. Bristol: Policy Press.
Feerick, M. and Silverman, G.B. (2006). Children Exposed to Violence. London: Paul H Brookes Publishing Co.
Grip, K. (2012). The Damage Done, Children Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence and Their Mothers — Towards Empirically Based Interventions in Order to Reduce Negative Health Effects in Children. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg.
Healy, K., Harrison, G., Venables, J. and Bosly, F. (2014). Collaborating with families in differential responses practitioners’ views. Child and Family Social Work, Article first published online: 4 April 2014.
Heather, D. and Walsh, T. (2010). Mothers, domestic violence and child protection. Violence Against Women, 16: 489–508.
Hegar, R.L. (2005). Privatization of child welfare services in the U.S.A. Current policy in historical context. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 12: 190–207.
Hester, M. (2004). Future trend and developments — violence against women in Europa and East Asia. Violence Against Women, 10: 1431–1448.
Humphreys, C., Carter, R., Eriksson, M., Haller, B., Hanmer, J., Hester, M., Kirvill, l., Lovett, J., Lunnerman, K., Rabe, H., Logar, R., Seith, C. and Thiara, R.K. (2005). The Justice System as an Arena for the Protection of Human Rights for Women and Children Experiencing Violence and Abuse. Final report. The EU Framework 6 Co-ordination Action on Human Rights Violation/CAH-RV. http://www.cahrv.uni-osnabruck.de
Humphreys, C. and Absler, D. (2011). History repeating: Child protection responses to domestic violence. Child and Family Social Work, 16: 464–473.
Khoo, E.G., Hyvönen, U. and Nygren, L. (2002). Child welfare or child protection: Uncovering Swedish and Canadian Orientations to social intervention in child maltreatment. Qualitative Social Work, 1: 451–471.
Leviner, P. (2013). Child protection under Swedish law. Legal duality and uncertainty. European Journal of Social Work, 17: 206–220.
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.
Melchiorre, R. and Vis, J.-A. (2013). Engagement strategies and change. An intentional practice response for the child welfare worker in cases of domestic violence. Child & Family Social Work, 18: 487–495.
Melton, G.M. (2005). Mandated reporting: A policy without reason. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29: 9–18.
Moretti, M. et al. (2006). Exposure to maternal vs. paternal partner violence, PTSD, and aggression in adolescent girls and boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32: 385–395.
National Board of Health and Welfare (2005). When Mum Is Beaten — To Help Children Who Have Lived with Family Violence. Stockholm: KopieCenter.
National Board of Health and Welfare (2009a) SOSFS 2009:22. National Guidelines for Work with Abused Women and Children Who Have Witnessed Violence. Stockholm: KopieCenter.
National Board of Health and Welfare (2009b) Abused Women and Children Who Have Witnessed Violence — All Municipal Responsibility. Final Report of a National Regulatory 2008–2009. Stockholm: KopieCenter.
National Board of Health and Welfare (2011). Children and Young People — Interventions in 2011. Stockholm: KopieCenter.
National Board of Health and Welfare (2013). To Reinforce and Develop the Quality of Support for Abused Women, Children Who Have Witnessed Violence. Stockholm: KopieCenter.
Östberg, F. (2014). Using ‘Consensual Ideology’: A way to shift reports in Child Welfare. British Journal of Social, 44: 63–80.
Øverlien, C. and Hydén, M. (2009). Children’s actions when experiencing domestic violence. Childhood, 16: 479–496.
Øverlien, C. (2011). Abused women with children or children of abused women? A study of conflicting perspectives at woman’s refuges in Norway. Child & Family Social Work, 16: 71–80.
Parton, N., Thorpe, D. and Wattan, C. (1997). Child Protection. Risk and the Moral Order. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Radford, L. and Hester, M. (2006). Mothering through Domestic Violence. London: Jessica Kinglsey.
Rasmusson, B., Hyvönen, U., Nygren, L. and Khoo, E. (2010). Child centered social work practice — Three unique meanings in the context of looking after children and the assessment framework in Australia, Canada and Sweden. Children and Youth Services Review, 32: 452–459.
Santos Pais, M. and Bissel, S. (2006). Overview and implementation of the UN Convention of the Right of the Child. The Lancet, 367 (9511): 689–690.
Schiratzki, J. (2013a) Best Interest of the Child. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schiratzki, J. (2013b) Defining and understanding ‘Children’ for legal research in Scandinavia. Some reflections on the principle of the best interest of the child — in the light of normality and exceptions. Family Law, Policy and Practice, 1: 8–13.
Stanley, N., Miller, P. and Richardson Foster, H.R. (2012). Engaging with children’s and parent’s perspective on domestic violence. Child & Family Social Work, 17: 192–201.
Svevo-Cianci, K. and Lee, Y. (2010a) Twenty years of the Convention on the Rights of the Child: Achievement in and challenges for child Protection implementation, measurement and evaluation around the world. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34: 1–4.
Svevo-Cianci, K., Hall, S. and Rubinson, C. (2010b) Protecting children from violence and Maltreatment. A qualitative comparative analysis assessing the implementation of U.N.C.RC Article 19. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34: 45–55.
Zannettino, L. and Mc Laren, H. (2014). Domestic violence and child protection: Towards a collaborative approach across the service sectors. Child & Family Social Work, 19: 421–431.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Ann-Charlotte Münger
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Münger, AC. (2016). ‘The Best Interests of the Child’ or the ‘Best Interests of the Family’? How the Child Protection Services in Sweden Respond to Domestic Violence. In: Hydén, M., Gadd, D., Wade, A. (eds) Response Based Approaches to the Study of Interpersonal Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409546_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409546_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57122-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40954-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)