Abstract
In the 1950s, it was believed that certain kinds of government intervention were necessary for the rapid development of Indian rural society. The most important intervention policy was land reform, which was conducted by state governments under the initiative of central government. However, in most states the implementation of land reform was haphazard due to the strong political influence of the rural landlord and other vested interests. Another important policy was the modernisation of rural society through sets of programmes like the Community Development Programme and the National Extension Service, both of which were started in 1952. These programmes were made for the dissemination of modern technologies, especially in agriculture, and the modernisation of rural society, and in accordance with these programmes, Block Development Offices were established as the implementing agency in almost all states. Despite this progress, the expectations of these programmes cannot be said to have been met. Although rural society has been steadily modernising and poverty has been gradually decreasing since India’s independence, it is not clear how much of this development can be attributed to these government-initiated programmes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad, F. 1995. Bureaucracy and Development Administration. New Delhi: Manak.
Chaturvedi, H.R. 1977. Bureaucracy and the Local Community: Dynamics of Rural Development. New Delhi: Allied Publisher.
Corbridge, S., G. Williams, M. Srivastava and R. Veron. 2005. Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fritz, D. 1976. ‘Bureaucratic Commitment in Rural India: A Psychological Application’. Asian Survey, 16, no. 4 (April): 338–354.
Gould, W. 2011. Bureaucracy, Community and Influence in India: Society and the State, 1930s-1960s. London: Routledge.
Goyal, S.K. 1985. Bureaucratic Administration in India. Allahabad: Chugh Publications.
Lieten, G.K. and Ravi Srivastava. 1999. Unequal Partners: Power Relations, Devolution and Development in Uttar Pradesh. New Delhi: Sage.
Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Mathur, K. 1972. Bureaucratic Response to Development: A Study of Block Development Officers in Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. Delhi: National Publishing House.
Misra, B.B. 1986. Government and Bureaucracy in India: 1947–1976. Delhi: Oxford.
Mook, B.T. 1982. The World of the Indian Field Administrator. New Delhi: Vikas.
Mullen, R.D. 2012. Decentralization, Local Governance, and Social Wellbeing in India: Do Local Governments Matter? London: Routledge.
Pant, S.K. and J. Pandey. 2004. Social Development in Rural India: Study of Uttar Pradesh. New Delhi: Rawat.
Potter, D.C. 1986. India’s Political Administrators 1919–1983. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ray, S.K. 1979. Indian Bureaucracy at the Crossroads. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
Sinha, P.R.R. T.K. Chakravarty and H.P.S. Arya. 1976. Village-Level Workers: A Study of Factors Influencing Their Performance. Hyderabad: National Institute of Community Development.
Singh, S.R. 1989. Bureaucracy and Rural Development: Policy Making, Planning and Implementation. New Delhi: Mittal.
Widmalm, S. 2008. Decentralisation, Corruption and Social Capital: From India to the West. New Delhi: Sage.
Widmalm, S. 2008. Decentralisation, Corruption and Social Capital: From India to the West. New Delhi: Sage.
GOI (Ministry of Finance). 1995. Economic Survey 1994–1995, New Delhi: Economic Division.
GOI (Ministry of Finance). 2012. Economic Survey 2011–2012, Statistical Appendix, A13 (http://indiabudget.nic.in/es2011–12/estatl.pdf), accessed on 18 May, 2012.
GOI (Ministry of Health and Family Planning). 2012. Rural Health Care System in India (http://nrhm-mis.nic.in/UI/RHS/RHS%202011/Rural%20Health%20Care%20System%20in%20lndia-%20Fina1%20-%209.4.2012.pdf), accessed on 17 January, 2013.
GOI (Office of the Registrar General). 2004. Census of India 2001 — Primary Census Abstract (Data Product No. 00-73-2001-Cen-CD) (CD), New Delhi.
GOI (Office of the Registrar General). 2006. Census of India 2001 — Table Name: C-1 Population by Religious Community, (C0101) (CD), New Delhi.
GOI (Prime Minister’s High Level Committee) (Chairperson: Rajindar Sachar). 2006. Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India. New Delhi: Cabinet Secretariat (`Sachar Committee’ in this paper).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 IDE-JETRO
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kondo, N. (2014). Transformation of Field Development Bureaucracy in Uttar Pradesh: Indigenisation and the Senses of Bureaucratic Discretion and Satisfaction. In: Tsujita, Y. (eds) Inclusive Growth and Development in India. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408747_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408747_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48837-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40874-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)