Skip to main content

Transformation of Field Development Bureaucracy in Uttar Pradesh: Indigenisation and the Senses of Bureaucratic Discretion and Satisfaction

  • Chapter
Inclusive Growth and Development in India

Part of the book series: IDE-JETRO Series ((IDE))

  • 106 Accesses

Abstract

In the 1950s, it was believed that certain kinds of government intervention were necessary for the rapid development of Indian rural society. The most important intervention policy was land reform, which was conducted by state governments under the initiative of central government. However, in most states the implementation of land reform was haphazard due to the strong political influence of the rural landlord and other vested interests. Another important policy was the modernisation of rural society through sets of programmes like the Community Development Programme and the National Extension Service, both of which were started in 1952. These programmes were made for the dissemination of modern technologies, especially in agriculture, and the modernisation of rural society, and in accordance with these programmes, Block Development Offices were established as the implementing agency in almost all states. Despite this progress, the expectations of these programmes cannot be said to have been met. Although rural society has been steadily modernising and poverty has been gradually decreasing since India’s independence, it is not clear how much of this development can be attributed to these government-initiated programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, F. 1995. Bureaucracy and Development Administration. New Delhi: Manak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi, H.R. 1977. Bureaucracy and the Local Community: Dynamics of Rural Development. New Delhi: Allied Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbridge, S., G. Williams, M. Srivastava and R. Veron. 2005. Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, D. 1976. ‘Bureaucratic Commitment in Rural India: A Psychological Application’. Asian Survey, 16, no. 4 (April): 338–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, W. 2011. Bureaucracy, Community and Influence in India: Society and the State, 1930s-1960s. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S.K. 1985. Bureaucratic Administration in India. Allahabad: Chugh Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieten, G.K. and Ravi Srivastava. 1999. Unequal Partners: Power Relations, Devolution and Development in Uttar Pradesh. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, K. 1972. Bureaucratic Response to Development: A Study of Block Development Officers in Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. Delhi: National Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, B.B. 1986. Government and Bureaucracy in India: 1947–1976. Delhi: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mook, B.T. 1982. The World of the Indian Field Administrator. New Delhi: Vikas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, R.D. 2012. Decentralization, Local Governance, and Social Wellbeing in India: Do Local Governments Matter? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, S.K. and J. Pandey. 2004. Social Development in Rural India: Study of Uttar Pradesh. New Delhi: Rawat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, D.C. 1986. India’s Political Administrators 1919–1983. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S.K. 1979. Indian Bureaucracy at the Crossroads. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, P.R.R. T.K. Chakravarty and H.P.S. Arya. 1976. Village-Level Workers: A Study of Factors Influencing Their Performance. Hyderabad: National Institute of Community Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.R. 1989. Bureaucracy and Rural Development: Policy Making, Planning and Implementation. New Delhi: Mittal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmalm, S. 2008. Decentralisation, Corruption and Social Capital: From India to the West. New Delhi: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Widmalm, S. 2008. Decentralisation, Corruption and Social Capital: From India to the West. New Delhi: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • GOI (Ministry of Finance). 1995. Economic Survey 1994–1995, New Delhi: Economic Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI (Ministry of Finance). 2012. Economic Survey 2011–2012, Statistical Appendix, A13 (http://indiabudget.nic.in/es2011–12/estatl.pdf), accessed on 18 May, 2012.

  • GOI (Ministry of Health and Family Planning). 2012. Rural Health Care System in India (http://nrhm-mis.nic.in/UI/RHS/RHS%202011/Rural%20Health%20Care%20System%20in%20lndia-%20Fina1%20-%209.4.2012.pdf), accessed on 17 January, 2013.

  • GOI (Office of the Registrar General). 2004. Census of India 2001 — Primary Census Abstract (Data Product No. 00-73-2001-Cen-CD) (CD), New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI (Office of the Registrar General). 2006. Census of India 2001 — Table Name: C-1 Population by Religious Community, (C0101) (CD), New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI (Prime Minister’s High Level Committee) (Chairperson: Rajindar Sachar). 2006. Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India. New Delhi: Cabinet Secretariat (`Sachar Committee’ in this paper).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 IDE-JETRO

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kondo, N. (2014). Transformation of Field Development Bureaucracy in Uttar Pradesh: Indigenisation and the Senses of Bureaucratic Discretion and Satisfaction. In: Tsujita, Y. (eds) Inclusive Growth and Development in India. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408747_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics