Skip to main content

Arms Transfers and the Human Rights Agenda

  • Chapter
The Uses and Misuses of Human Rights
  • 381 Accesses

Abstract

Arms control and human rights have conventionally been seen and addressed as separate issues. Within the United Nations and other intergovernmental organizations, separate and siloed issue-area regimes have been constructed over several decades, with the effect that issues identified as belonging to one or the other of the two domains are discussed in different settings, by different actors, and with reference to different normative frameworks. Separate discourse communities have developed, with very little overlap in the way issues are framed and discussed. Issues identified as human rights concerns are typically taken up by the UN Human Rights Council or referred to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, with reference to core human rights treaties.1 Conventional arms control issues, on the other hand, are normally taken up by UN member states in the General Assembly’s First Committee, which deals with disarmament and international security. Some related issues, of course, may be addressed by the UN Security Council or at annual meetings of the Conference on Disarmament, or within less formal organizational settings, such as the Wassenaar Arrangement.2 To complicate matters further, during the first several decades following conclusion of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, humanitarian concerns and war crimes explicitly related to the body of international humanitarian law of war (IHL) were typically viewed as a third discrete issue area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amnesty International (AI). (2009). “Report 2009: Demand dignity.” Amnesty. org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://report2009.amnesty.org/en/global-themes/demand-dignity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. (2008). Blood at the crossroads: Making the case for a global arms trade treaty. London: Author. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ACT30/013/2008/en/8550ba57-7069-11dd8e5 e-43 ea85 d 15 a69/act300132008 en.pdf.

  • Amnesty International. (2002). Amnesty International handbook. London: Author. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ORG20/001/2002/en.

  • Amnesty International. ( 2001, July 8). “Human rights abuses with small arms: Illustrative cases from Amnesty International reports 2000–2001.” Amnesty.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/POL34/007/2001/en.

  • Amnesty International. ( 1994, April 13). “USA: Amnesty International calls for United States government to suspend military aid to Columbia.” Amnesty.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/NWS 11 /074/ 1994/en/24025 cbf-ec0c-11 dd-85 b9-0939011 eabc9/ nws 110741994en.html.

  • Amnesty International. (1992a). Amnesty International policy manual. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. ( 1992b, November 19). “Papua New Guinea: Torture and killing continues on Bougainville—government turns a blind eye.” Amnesty.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/NWS 11/148/ 1993/en/05138fbd-ec36-11 dd-8d9d-a7825928c0bf/ nws 111481993en.html.

  • Andreopoulos, G., Arat, Z. F. K, & Juviler, P. (Eds.). (2006). Non-state actors in the human rights universe. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, D., Glatz, A. K., & Muggah, R. (2006). Demanding attention: Addressing the dynamics of small arms demand. Geneva: Small Arms Survey and Quaker United Nations Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benninger-Budel, C. (2008). Due diligence and its application to protect women from violence. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.brill.nl/due-diligence-and-its-application-protect-women-violence.

  • Clark, A. M. (2001). Diplomacy of conscience: Amnesty International and changing human rights norms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, B. (2010). “Packing heat: Pro-gun groups and the governance of small arms.” In D. D. Avant, M. Finnemore, & S. K. Sell (Eds.), Who Governs the Globe? (pp. 183–201 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2007). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Control Arms. (2014a). Collection of papers. ControlArms.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://controlarms.org/indepth.php.

  • Control Arms. (2014b). The story so far [Short film]. ControlArms.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://controlarms.org/about.php.

    Google Scholar 

  • Control Arms. (2014c). “Tracking the negotiations.” ControlArms.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://controlarms.org/negotiations.php.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S. (1999, December 7). “U.N. coming for your guns: Private groups, governments team up to restrict use, ownership of firearms.” WorldNetDaily.com [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=3895.

  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). ( 2001, July 9). “Speech delivered by the Executive Director, Arms Division HRW, Joost R. Hiltermann, at the U.N. Conference on Small Arms Trafficking, New York, NY.” HRW.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2001/07/08/ un-conference-small-arms-trafficking-new-york.

    Google Scholar 

  • Control Arms. ( 1994, January 1). “Arming Rwanda: The arms trade and human rights abuses in the Rwandan war.” HRW.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/1994/01/01/arming-rwanda.

  • Control Arms. (1993). State of war: Political violence and counter-insurgency in Colombia. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) & Amnesty International (AI). (2011). “How an arms trade treaty can help prevent armed violence.” London: Authors. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://controlarms.org/ wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011 /03/How-an-Arms-Trade-Treaty-CanHelp.pdf.

  • IANSA, Oxfam, & Saferworld. ( 2007, October). “Africa: The Missing Billions” [briefing paper]. ControlArms.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://controlarms.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Africas-missing-billions.pdf.

  • International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (2014). “Customary international humanitarian law: Rule 71. Weapons that are by nature indiscriminate.” ICRC.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule71.

  • Khan, I., & Petrasek, D. (2009). The unheard truth: Poverty and human rights. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, M. (1999). “Small arms proliferation and its impact on security and development.” In L. Webster & K. Cell (Eds.), ECAAR papers: United Nations 1999 symposium on disbarment and development (pp. 10–15). Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.epsusa.org/publications/papers/disarm.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam International. (2014). “Oxfam purpose and beliefs.” Oxfam.org [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.oxfam.org/en/about/what/ purpose-and-beliefs.

  • Oxfam & Amnesty International. (2003). Shattered lives: The case for tough international arms control. Witney, UK: Information Press. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://controlarms.org/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2011/02/ Shattered-lives-the-case-for-tough-international-arms-control.pdf.

  • Timmerman, J. (1981). Prisoner without a name; cell without a number. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2000). “Report of the Secretary General to the Millennium Assembly (A/54/2000, sect. F.).” Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.un.org/disarmament/HomePage/SG/docs/2000/excerptSG.pdf.

  • UN General Assembly. (2009). “Resolution 64/48: The Arms Trade Treaty (A/ RES/64/48).” Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/64/48.

  • UN International Law Commission. (2005). “Responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts, 2001.” Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/9_6.htm.

  • Waltz, S., & Booth Walling, C. (2013). “Invoking standards of international humanitarian law.” Human Rights Advocacy & the History of Human Rights Standards [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://humanrightshistory.umich.edu/problems/humanitarian-law/.

  • Wood, B., & Estevez, A. ( 2010, November). “Towards a bullet-proof arms trade treaty.” Committee on Disarmament, Peace & Security [online]. Retrieved on April 14, 2014, from http://disarm.igc.org/index.php?option=com_con tent &view= article &id =42 0: towards-a-bullet-proof-arms-tradetreaty&catid=150:disarmament-times-fall-2010&Itemid=2.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 George Andreopoulos and Zehra F. Kabasakal Arat

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waltz, S. (2014). Arms Transfers and the Human Rights Agenda. In: Andreopoulos, G., Arat, Z.F.K. (eds) The Uses and Misuses of Human Rights. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408341_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics