Skip to main content

A Decoupled Homelessness

Changing Signification

  • Chapter
Homeless Lives in American Cities
  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

Family anxieties are never fully decoupled from the discourse on homelessness, but the homeless figure is no longer a primary carrier of these social fears. The culturalization of politics processes enable the family anxieties to become relatively freestanding as part of the family values movement. But in this separation from the discourse on homelessness, the family also loses its role as the last remnant of Gemeinschaft. The idea of home—which the discourse on homelessness has legitimated through the process of negation—also decouples from the discourse on homelessness. “Home” becomes significantly reinforced in public discourses, as threats to homeland security emerge as a substantial concern. Relatively emptied of its signification, the category of homelessness transforms from the mid-1990s to the present to become primarily a material condition of where one stays at night. Though mostly shorn of the century-plus discourse, the transformation of homelessness into a housing problem is not without some difficulties to which we shall turn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Marvin Olasky, The Tragedy of American Compassion (Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway, 1992); or Marvin Olasky, “Giving That Worked,” World Magazine, 2009, accessed March 2009, http://www.worldmag.com/articles/15070.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Dilulio, “John Dilulio’s Letter,” Esquire, October 24, 2002, accessed July 16, 2013, http://www.esquire.com/features/dilulio. David Kuo, who also worked in the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, also recounts the waning interest in compassionate conservatism in the Bush White House following the 9/11 attacks. David Kuo, Tempting Faith: An Inside Story of Political Seduction (New York: Free Press, 2006), chapter 12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Patrick Dobel, “The Rhetorical Possibilities of ‘Home’ in Homeland Security,” Administration & Society 42, no. 4 (2010): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Philip Mangano, “Abolishing Homelessness in Ten Years,” interview by David Neff, Christianity Today 53, no. 5 (May 2009): 52, accessed July 19, 2013, http://www.christianirytoday.com/ct/2009/may/30.52.htm1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Often the linear model is called by its original name: the continuum of care model. However, the Continuum of Care has evolved to become a local planning council, which also serves as a funding vehicle for HUD to channel money to local nonprofits. Because of the dual role of funding and planning in the present moment and the historical role of a service arrangement, I follow after Stefan G. Kertesz, et al., and use the term linear model to avoid confusion between the historical and present uses of “continuum of care.” Stefan G. Kertesz, et al., “Housing First for Homeless Persons with Active Addiction: Are We Overreaching?” Milbank Quarterly 87, no. 2 (June 2009): 495–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sam Tsemberis, Leyla Gulcur, and Maria Nakae, “Housing First Consumer Choice, and Harm Reduction for Homeless Individuals with a Dual Diagnosis,” American Journal of Public Health 94, no. 4 (April 2004): 651–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alan Gilbert, “Power, Ideology and the Washington Consensus: The Development and Spread of Chilean Housing Policy,” Housing Studies 17, no. 2 (2002): 305–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stuart Hodkinson, Paul Watt, and Gerry Mooney, “Introduction: Neoliberal Housing Policy—Time for a Critical Re-appraisal,” Critical Social Policy 33, no. 3 (2013): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. David Clapham and Susan J. Smith, “Housing Policy and ‘Special Needs,’” Policy and Politics 18, no. 3 (1990): 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76, trans. David Macey (New York: Picador, 2003), 245.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mary Ellen Hombs and Mitch Snyder, “Homelessness and the Hundredth Monkey: A Preface,” in Homelessness in America: A Forced March to Nowhere, ed. Mary Ellen Hombs and Mitch Snyder (Washington, DC: Community for Creative Non-Violence, 1986), viii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Philip Webb

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Webb, P. (2014). A Decoupled Homelessness. In: Homeless Lives in American Cities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137405647_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics