Skip to main content

Abstract

How do people protect themselves from being transformed or changed through social interaction? While we often assume that changes brought about through social interaction are positive, leading to human and societal development, it is also the case that people can feel threatened and thus resist change. Moreover, in contemporary societies, people are confronted by such a bewildering variety of perspectives that one could argue that stability is more of a problem for research than change itself (Gergen, 1991; Grossen et al., 2011). The aim of this chapter is to analyse the semiotic mechanics of resisting the transformative potential of social interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andreouli, E. (2013). Identity and acculturation: The case of naturalised citizens in Britain. Culture & Psychology, 19, 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W. & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum er, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1996). When contact is not enough: Social identity and intergroup cooperation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., Chak, A., Cornish, R & Gillespie, A. (2012). Dialogue: Bridging personal, community, and social transformation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53, 70–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, F. & Gillespie, A. (2009). A pragmatist approach to the problem of knowledge in health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(6), 800–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coudin, G. (2013). The breakdown of the hegemonic representation of madness in Africa. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duveen, G. & Lloyd, B. (1990). Introduction. In G. Duveen & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, R. (1997). The significance of the skin as a natural boundary in the sub-division of psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27, 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, R. M. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology: 1874–1954. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2014). From mhroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, doi: 10.1111/ jtsb.12075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A. (2007). The intersubjective dynamics of trust, distrust and manipulation. In I. Markovâ & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and distrust: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 131–152). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic baniers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A. (2012). Contact without transformation: The context, process and content of distrust. In I. Markova & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 201–216). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A., Kadianaki, I. & O’Sullivan-Lago, R. (2012). Encountering alterity: Geographic and semantic movements. In Jaan Valsiner (Ed.), Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 695–709). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossen, M. & Salazar Orvig, A. (2011). Dialogism and dialogicality in the study of the self. Culture & Psychology, 17(4), 491–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M. & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the “contact hypothesis.”In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1–44). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 65–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ichheiser, G. (1943). Structure and dynamics of interpersonal relations. American Sociological Review, 8, 302–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadianaki, I. (2014). The transformative effects of stigma: Coping strategies as meaning-making efforts for immigrants living in Greece. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kus, L., Liu, J. & Ward, C. (2013). Relative deprivation versus system justification: Polemical social representations and identity positioning in a post-Soviet society. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R. D., Phillipson, H. & Lee, A. R. (1966). Interpersonal perception: A theory and method of research. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1991). On thinking-of-the-other: Entre nous. London: The Athlone Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marko va, I. & Gillespie, A. (Eds.) (2012). Trust and conflict: representation, culture and dialogue. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W.J. (1961). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24, 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W.J. & Papageorgis, D. (1962). Effectiveness of forewarning in developing resistance to persuasion. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1976/2008). Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasie, M., Bar-Tal, D., Pliskin, R., Nahhas, E. & Halperin, E. (2014). Overcoming the barrier of narrative adherence in conflicts through awareness of the psychological bias of naïve realism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, doi: 10.1177/0146167214551153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 1–26). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan-Lago, R. (2009). The Dialogical Self in a Cultural Contact Zone: The Impact of Cultural Continuity. PhD thesis, Department of Psycholog)’’, Oxford Brookes University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papastamou, S. (1986). Psychologization and processes of minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. A nnual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfau, M., Kenski, H. C., Nitz, M. & Sorenson, J. (1990). Efficacy of inoculation strategies in promoting resistance to political attack messages: Application to direct mail. Communication Monographs, 57, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psaltis, C. (2011). Intergroup trust and contact in transition: A social representations perspective on the Cyprus conflict. In Ivana Marková and Alex Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 83–104). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp, M. & Wagner, W. (2011). The essentially other: Representational processes that divide groups. In Ivana Mark ova and Alex Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 105–122). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. &John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammut, G. & Sartawi, M. (2012). Perspective-taking and the attribution of ignorance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammut, G., Clark, M. & Kissaun, G. D. (2014). Clark, M. and Kissaun, G. D. (2014), Dialogue, linguistic hinges and semantic barriers: Social psychological uses and functions of a vulgar term. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44(3), 326–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgment of magnitude. Psychological Review, 64, 192–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. (1928). The methodology of behaviour study. In W. I. Thomas and D. S. Thomas (Eds), The child in America: Behaviour problems and programs (pp. 553–576). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2002). Forms of dialogical relations and semiotic autoregulation within the self. Theory & Psychology, 12, 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2011). The dynamics of trust and non-trust. In Ivana Markova and Alex Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 49–69). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, U. & Machleit, U. (1986). Gastarbeiter in the Federal Republic of Germany: Contact between Germans and migrant populations. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 59–78). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Alex Gillespie

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gillespie, A. (2015). Non-Transformative Social Interaction. In: Psaltis, C., Gillespie, A., Perret-Clermont, AN. (eds) Social Relations in Human and Societal Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137400994_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics