Abstract
How do people protect themselves from being transformed or changed through social interaction? While we often assume that changes brought about through social interaction are positive, leading to human and societal development, it is also the case that people can feel threatened and thus resist change. Moreover, in contemporary societies, people are confronted by such a bewildering variety of perspectives that one could argue that stability is more of a problem for research than change itself (Gergen, 1991; Grossen et al., 2011). The aim of this chapter is to analyse the semiotic mechanics of resisting the transformative potential of social interaction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andreouli, E. (2013). Identity and acculturation: The case of naturalised citizens in Britain. Culture & Psychology, 19, 165–183.
Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bauer, M. W. & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163–186.
Blum er, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Brewer, M. B. (1996). When contact is not enough: Social identity and intergroup cooperation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 291–303.
Cooper, M., Chak, A., Cornish, R & Gillespie, A. (2012). Dialogue: Bridging personal, community, and social transformation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53, 70–93.
Cornish, F. & Gillespie, A. (2009). A pragmatist approach to the problem of knowledge in health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(6), 800–809.
Coudin, G. (2013). The breakdown of the hegemonic representation of madness in Africa. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43, 23–44.
Duveen, G. & Lloyd, B. (1990). Introduction. In G. Duveen & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farr, R. (1997). The significance of the skin as a natural boundary in the sub-division of psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27, 305–323.
Farr, R. M. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology: 1874–1954. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–320.
Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
Gergen, K. J. (2014). From mhroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, doi: 10.1111/ jtsb.12075.
Gillespie, A. (2007). The intersubjective dynamics of trust, distrust and manipulation. In I. Markovâ & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and distrust: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 131–152). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic baniers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 375–391.
Gillespie, A. (2012). Contact without transformation: The context, process and content of distrust. In I. Markova & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 201–216). London, UK: Routledge.
Gillespie, A., Kadianaki, I. & O’Sullivan-Lago, R. (2012). Encountering alterity: Geographic and semantic movements. In Jaan Valsiner (Ed.), Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 695–709). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grossen, M. & Salazar Orvig, A. (2011). Dialogism and dialogicality in the study of the self. Culture & Psychology, 17(4), 491–509.
Hewstone, M. & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the “contact hypothesis.”In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1–44). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 65–86.
Ichheiser, G. (1943). Structure and dynamics of interpersonal relations. American Sociological Review, 8, 302–305.
Kadianaki, I. (2014). The transformative effects of stigma: Coping strategies as meaning-making efforts for immigrants living in Greece. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 125–138.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Kus, L., Liu, J. & Ward, C. (2013). Relative deprivation versus system justification: Polemical social representations and identity positioning in a post-Soviet society. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 423–437.
Laing, R. D., Phillipson, H. & Lee, A. R. (1966). Interpersonal perception: A theory and method of research. London: Tavistock Publications.
Levinas, E. (1991). On thinking-of-the-other: Entre nous. London: The Athlone Press Ltd.
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Marko va, I. & Gillespie, A. (Eds.) (2012). Trust and conflict: representation, culture and dialogue. London: Routledge.
McGuire, W.J. (1961). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24, 184–197.
McGuire, W.J. & Papageorgis, D. (1962). Effectiveness of forewarning in developing resistance to persuasion. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 24–34.
Moscovici, S. (1976/2008). Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public. Cambridge: Polity.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nasie, M., Bar-Tal, D., Pliskin, R., Nahhas, E. & Halperin, E. (2014). Overcoming the barrier of narrative adherence in conflicts through awareness of the psychological bias of naïve realism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, doi: 10.1177/0146167214551153.
Newell, A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 1–26). New York: Academic Press.
O’Sullivan-Lago, R. (2009). The Dialogical Self in a Cultural Contact Zone: The Impact of Cultural Continuity. PhD thesis, Department of Psycholog)’’, Oxford Brookes University.
Papastamou, S. (1986). Psychologization and processes of minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 165–180.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. A nnual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751.
Pfau, M., Kenski, H. C., Nitz, M. & Sorenson, J. (1990). Efficacy of inoculation strategies in promoting resistance to political attack messages: Application to direct mail. Communication Monographs, 57, 1–12.
Psaltis, C. (2011). Intergroup trust and contact in transition: A social representations perspective on the Cyprus conflict. In Ivana Marková and Alex Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 83–104). London: Routledge.
Raudsepp, M. & Wagner, W. (2011). The essentially other: Representational processes that divide groups. In Ivana Mark ova and Alex Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 105–122). London: Routledge.
Rothbart, M. &John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 81–104.
Sammut, G. & Sartawi, M. (2012). Perspective-taking and the attribution of ignorance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42, 181–200.
Sammut, G., Clark, M. & Kissaun, G. D. (2014). Clark, M. and Kissaun, G. D. (2014), Dialogue, linguistic hinges and semantic barriers: Social psychological uses and functions of a vulgar term. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44(3), 326–346.
Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 349–356.
Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgment of magnitude. Psychological Review, 64, 192–204.
Thomas, W. (1928). The methodology of behaviour study. In W. I. Thomas and D. S. Thomas (Eds), The child in America: Behaviour problems and programs (pp. 553–576). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Valsiner, J. (2002). Forms of dialogical relations and semiotic autoregulation within the self. Theory & Psychology, 12, 251–265.
Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2011). The dynamics of trust and non-trust. In Ivana Markova and Alex Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue (pp. 49–69). London: Routledge.
Wagner, U. & Machleit, U. (1986). Gastarbeiter in the Federal Republic of Germany: Contact between Germans and migrant populations. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 59–78). Oxford: Blackwell.
Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Alex Gillespie
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gillespie, A. (2015). Non-Transformative Social Interaction. In: Psaltis, C., Gillespie, A., Perret-Clermont, AN. (eds) Social Relations in Human and Societal Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137400994_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137400994_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48626-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40099-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)