Skip to main content

Self, Identity, and Politics in the Study of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity: The Promise of Deliberative Democracy

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity
  • 698 Accesses

Abstract

What form of politics and political engagement is most likely to promote an altruistic orientation, resolve moral conflicts, and facilitate social solidarity in modern society? Durkheim believed that the answer to this question is to be found in an elitist form of liberal democracy where a strong and active state functions as an “organ of reflection” in the protection of individual rights and the promotion of a moral individualism. In this chapter I offer an alternative proposal, one that is rooted in the basic principles of deliberative democracy. My argument, in brief, is that Durkheim did not appreciate the fact that an effective democratic framework must be grounded in the basic principles of human symbolic interaction. While he may have understood the limitations of a structurally induced individualism, he did not anticipate the growing emphasis on self-reflexivity and the emergence of identity politics. As a consequence, he underestimated the need for a more radical form of democracy based on dialogue and deliberation in the public sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agger, Ben. 1991. “Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance.” Annual Review of Sociology 17:105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. Daniel. 2011. Altruism in Humans. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Seyla, ed. 1996. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Basil. 1972. “Social Class, Language and Socialization.” Pp 157–178 in Language and Social Context, edited by Pier Paolo Giglioli. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard J. 2010. The Pragmatic Turn. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James. 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James and William Rehg, eds. 1997. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reasons and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callero, Peter L. 2003. “The Sociology of the Sell.” Annual Review of Sociology 29:115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callero, Peter L. 2014. “Sell, Identity, and Social Inequality.” In Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality, edited by Jane McLeod, Ed Lawler, and Michael Schwalbe. New York: Kluwer-Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Simone. 1996. Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Simone. 2003. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6:307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, Vera Schattan P., Barbara Pozzoni, and Mariana Cifuentes Montoya. 2005. “Participation and Public Policies in Brazil.” Pp. 174–184 in The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, edited by John Gastil and Peter Levine. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 2001. “Social Movements and the Focus of Emotional Attention,” Pp. 27–44 in Passionate Politics, edited by Jell Goodwin, James M. Jasper, and Francesca Polletta. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela Johnston and Donald Searing. 2005. “Studying ‘Everyday Talk’ in the Deliberative System.” Acta Politica 40:269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, Marjorie. L. 1996. “Talking Back to Sociology: Distinctive Contributions of Feminist Methodology.” Annual Review of Sociology 22:29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John S. 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1897] 1951. Suicide. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1922] 1956. Education and Sociology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1925] 1961. Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1912] 1965. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1938] 1977. The Evolution of Educational Thought. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1986. “The Concept of the State.” Pp. 32–72 in Durkheim on Politics and the State, edited with an introduction by Anthony Giddens. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon. 1998. “Deliberation and Constitution Making.” Pp. 97–122 in Deliberative Democracy, edited by Jon Elster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Sara Margaret and Harry C. Boyte. 1986. Free Spaces. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Gary Alan. 2012. Tiny Publics: A Theory of Group Action and Culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Pp. 109–142 in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by C. Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon. 2003. “Deliberative Democracy Chicago Style: Grass-Roots Governance in Policing and Public Education.” Pp. 111–143 in Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, edited by Archon Fung and Erik Olin Wright. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon and Erik Olin Wright. 2003. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1986. Durkheim on Politics and the State. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1994. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. New York: Double Day and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1997. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Maiden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion. Maiden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, Michael A. 2006. “Social Identity Theory.” Pp. 111–136 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by P. J. Burke. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, Sylvia. 2005. “The Next Generation of Diversity and Intergroup Relations Research.” Journal of Social Issues 61:595–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, Simon and Paul M. Sniderman. 2006. “The Limits of Deliberative Discussion: A Model of Everyday Political Arguments.” Journal of Politics 68:272–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Lawrence R., Fay Lomax Cook, and Michael X. Delli Carpini. 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Melvin L. and Carmi Schooler. 1983. Work and Personality: An Inquiry into the Impact of Social Stratification. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, Leon. 1997. The New Public: Professional Communication and the Means of Social Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, George J. 2006. “Symbolic Interaction.” Pp. 1–23 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by P. J. Burke. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müeller, Hans-Peter. 1993. “Durkheim’s Political Sociology.” Pp. 93–107 in Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Moralist, edited by Stephen Turner. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, Diana C. 2008. “Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?” Annual Review of Political Science 11:521–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prager, Jeffrey. 1981. “Moral Integration and Political Inclusion: A Comparison of Durkheim’s and Weber’s Theories of Democracy.” Social Forces 59:918–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2006. “Status Construction Theory.” Pp. 301–323 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by P. J. Burke. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Lynn. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25:347–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderhan, Erik and Shamus Khan. 2008. “Reasons and Inclusion: The Foundation of Deliberation.” Sociological Theory 26:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard. 2011. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalin, Dimitri N. 1992. “Critical Theory and the Pragmatist Challenge.” American Journal of Sociology 98:237–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian. 2010. What is a Person: Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, Jan E. 2006. “Identity Theory.” Pp. 88–110 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by P. J. Burke. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkin, Tracy and Adam F. Simon. 2001. “Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting.” Political Psychology 22:809–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers-Effler, Erika. 2005. “The Emotional Significance of Solidarity for Social Movement Communities: Sustaining Catholic Worker Community and Service.” Pp. 135–149 in Emotions and Social Movements, edited by Helena Flam and Debra King. New York: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11:497–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Jonathan H. and Jan E. Stets. 2006. “Moral Emotions.” Pp. 544–566 in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, edited by Jan E. Stets and Jonathan H. Turner. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. 1997. “Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication.” Pp. 383–406 in Deliberative Democracy, edited by James Boham and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Vincent Jeffries

Copyright information

© 2014 Vincent Jeffries

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Callero, P.L. (2014). Self, Identity, and Politics in the Study of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity: The Promise of Deliberative Democracy. In: Jeffries, V. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391865_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics