Abstract
One of the more seemingly problematic areas of Foucault’s thought is on the question of freedom. What place does freedom have in Foucault’s thought; how might it be understood? If ‘power is everywhere’, if it is coextensive with all social relations, if it is to be found in everyday interactions between individuals, then what room is left for freedom? How can spaces for freedom be reconciled with the ubiquity of power relations, with the apparent omnipresence of disciplinary constraints, with forms of power/knowledge which construct individuals as subjects and with governmental rationalities aimed at normalizing behaviour? Foucault sees freedom as a kind of ‘game’ played with power, as a series of strategic moves that can take place within certain limits set by power. However, if this is the case, it would seem to offer only limited opportunities for freedom. Freedom, and the possibilities of resisting power, would seem to be produced by, or at least realized through, the operation of power, and they are therefore always constrained by it.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berlin, I. (1958) Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Flathman, R. E. (2003) Freedom and its Conditions: Discipline, Autonomy, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1996) ‘What is Critique?’, in Schmidt, J. (ed.) What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth Century Answers and Twentieth Century Questions, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 382–98.
Foucault, M. (2000a) ‘The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom’, in Rabinow, P. (ed.) Ethics: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 1, London: Penguin, pp. 281–301.
Foucault, M. (2000b) ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in Rabinow, P. (ed.) Ethics: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 1, London: Penguin, pp. 303–19.
Foucault, M. (2002a) ‘“Omnes et Singulatim”: Toward a Critique of Political Reason’, in Faubion, J. D. (ed.) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 3, London: Penguin, pp. 298–325.
Foucault, M. (2002b) ‘The Subject and Power’, in Faubion, J. D. (ed.) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 3, London: Penguin, pp. 326–48.
Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978, Senellart, M. (ed.), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fraser, N. (1981) ‘Foucault on Modern Power; Empirical Insights and Normative Confusions’, Praxis International, 1(3), pp. 272–87.
Habermas, J. (1981) ‘Modernity versus Postmodernity’, New German Critique, 22(Winter), pp. 3–14.
Hobbes, T. (1981 [1651]) Leviathan, Macpherson, C. B. (ed.), London: Penguin.
La Boétie, É. (2008 [ca 1548]) The Politics of Obedience: the Discourse of Voluntary Servitude. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Taylor, C. (1984) ‘Foucault on Freedom and Truth’, Political Theory, 12(2), pp. 152–83.
Walzer, M. (1991) ‘The Politics of Michel Foucault’, in Hoy, D. C. (ed.) Foucault: a Critical Reader, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 51–68.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Saul Newman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newman, S. (2015). ‘Critique Will Be the Art of Voluntary Inservitude’: Foucault, La Boétie and the Problem of Freedom. In: Fuggle, S., Lanci, Y., Tazzioli, M. (eds) Foucault and the History of Our Present. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385925_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385925_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48142-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38592-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)