Abstract
A discourse analysis of German left-wing media coverage of the Middle East conflict brought to light a phenomenon also seen in other political fields, but much stronger in quantity and quality: Much of the discourse was related to Germany’s National Socialist past. Vocabulary from that era was used and comparisons drawn. In one newspaper, Palestinian violence was reported on as the actions “of a mob”, aimed not at “taking back illegally expropriated soil” but at “exterminating Jewish existence” (Bartel and Ullrich 2008). Earlier statements by pro-Israeli autonomist activists had described the Palestinians as the “biggest anti-Semitic collective” and stated that the “Popular belief in Palestine” is “völkisch” (literally “folkish”, extremely nationalistic, an essential part of German Nazis’ self-description) and aims at a “pure-blood Palestine free of Jews” (Ullrich 2008). In a similar fashion, the well-known and at times politically active German poet Günter Grass wrote a poem (“What has to be said”) about his fears of an Israeli attack on Iran, which in his view may “exterminate the Iranian people” — an allusion to the Nazi extermination of Jews. Some pro-Palestinian activists hailed this political statement as an act of bravery. The question arises as to why, despite having different political aims, politically active Germans — especially radical activists — debate the Middle East conflict in a discursive framework so strongly shaped by terms and patterns from the discourse of or about Germany’s National Socialist past. Or more generally, what shapes the discursive patterns of these movements?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartel, Daniel and Peter Ullrich. 2008. “Kritische Diskursanalyse. Darstellung anhand der Analyse der Nahostberichterstattung linker Medien.” Pp.53–72 in Kritik mit Methode? Forschungsmethoden und Gesellschaftskritik, edited by U. Freikamp et al. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
Baumgarten, Britta. 2010. Interessenvertretung aus dem Abseits. Frankfurt am Main, Germany;New York, NY: Campus.
Baumgarten, Britta. and Peter Ullrich. 2012. “Discourse, Power and Governmentality: Social Movement Research with and beyond Foucault.” WZB Discussion Paper SP IV 2012–401, Social Science Research Centre Berlin (http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2012/iv12-401.pdf).
Benthin, Rainer. 2004. Auf dem Weg in die Mitte: Öffentlichkeitsstrategien der Neuen Rechten. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: Garden City, NY; New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Brand, Karl-Werner, Detlef Büsser, and Dieter Rucht. 1986. Aufbruch in eine andere Gesellschaft. Neue soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
Buechler, Steven M. 2000. Social Movements in Advanced Capitalism: The Political Economy and Cultural Construction of Social Activism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Daphi, Priska, Peter Ullrich, and Anja Lê. 2013. “Images of Surveillance: The Contested and Embedded Visual Language of Anti-Surveillance Protests.” Pp.55–80 in Advances in the Visual Analysis of Social Movements (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, Volume 35), edited by N. Doerr, A. Mattoni, and S. Teune. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Death, Carl. 2010. “Counter-Conducts: A Foucauldian Analytics of Protest.” Social Movement Studies 9(3):235–251.
della Porta, Donatella. 1999. “Protest, Protesters, and Protest Policing: Public Discourses in Italy and Germany from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Pp.66–96 in How Social Movements Matter, edited by M. Giugni, D. McAdam, and C. Tilly. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Eder, Klaus. 2000. Kulturelle Identität zwischen Tradition und Utopie: Soziale Bewegungen als Ort gesellschaftlicher Lernprozesse. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
Eyerman, Ron and Andrew Jamison. 1991. Social Movements. A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ferree, Myra, William A. Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge;New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1982. I, Pierre Rivière, Having Slaughtered my Mother, my Sister, and my Brother. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “Polemics, Politics and Problematizations: Interview with Paul Rabinow.” Pp.381–398 in The Foucault Reader, edited by P. Rabinow. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel. 2010. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York, NY: Pantheon.
Gamson, William A. and Andre Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power. A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95(1):1–37.
Gerhards, Jürgen. 1992. “Dimensionen und Strategien öffentlicher Diskurse.” Journal für Sozialforschung 32(3/4):307–318.
Gerhards, Jürgen. and Dieter Rucht. 2000. “Öffentlichkeit, Akteure and Deutungsmuster. Die Debatte über Abtreibungen in Deutschland und den USA.” Pp.165–188 in Die Vermessung kultureller Unterschiede. USA und Deutschland im Vergleich, edited by J. Gerhards. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Goldberg, Chad Allan. 2001. “Welfare Recipients or Workers? Contesting the Workfare State in New York City.” Social Theory 19(2):187–218.
Gusfield, Joseph. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Hafez, Kai. 2002. Die politische Dimension der Auslandsberichterstattung: Band 2, Das Nahost- und Islambild der deutschen überregionalen Presse. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
Hajer, Maarten A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, Stuart, ed. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.
Heßdörfer, Florian, Andrea Pabst, and Peter Ullrich, eds. 2010. Prevent and Tame. Protest under (Self-)control. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
Japp, Klaus P. 1984. “Selbsterzeugung und Fremdverschulden: Thesen zum Rationalismus in den Theorien sozialer Bewegungen.” Soziale Welt 35:313–329.
Jasper, James M. 1997. The Art of Moral Protest. Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.
Jasper, James M. 2007. “Cultural Approaches in the Sociology of Social Movements.” Pp.59–109 in Handbook of Social Movements across Disciplines, edited by B. Klandermans and C. Roggeband. New York, NY: Springer.
Johnston, Hank. 2009. “Protest Cultures: Performance, Artefacts, and Ideations.” Pp.1–27 in Culture, Social Movements, and Protest, edited by H. Johnston. Aldershot: Ashgate
Keller, Reiner. 2001. “Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse.” Pp.113–143 in Handbuch sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band 1: Theorien und Methoden. 2001, edited by R. Keller, A. Hirseland, W. Schneider, and W. Viehöver. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
Keller, Reiner. 2009. Müll – Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion des Wertvollen. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag.
Keller, Reiner. 2010. Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse. Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
Keller, Reiner. 2011. “The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD).” Human Studies: a Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences 34(1):43–66.
Keller, Reiner. 2013. Doing Discourse Research. London: Sage.
Keller, Reiner. Forthcoming. The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse. New York, NY: Springer (Translation of Keller 2010).
Keller, Reiner. and Inga Truschkat, eds. 2012. Methodologie und Praxis der Wissenssoziologischen Diskursanalyse: Band 1: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag.
Klandermans, Bert. 1988. “The Formation and Mobilization of Consensus.” Pp.173–196 in From Structure to Action. Comparing Social Movements across Cultures, vol. 1, International Social Movement Research, edited by B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, and S. Tarrow. Greenwich, CT: JAI-Press.
Koopmans, Ruud and Hanspeter Kriesi. 1997. Citizenship, National Identity and the Mobilisation of the Extreme Right: A Comparison of France, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
Koopmans, Ruud and Paul Statham, eds. 2000. “Migration and Ethnic Relations as a Field of Political Contention: An Opportunity Structure Approach.” Pp.13–56 in Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics: Comparative European Perspectives. Oxford;New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lamont, Michèle and Laurent Thévenot, eds. 2000. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology. Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laubenthal, Barbara. 2006. Der Kampf um Legalisierung: Soziale Bewegungen illegaler Migranten in Frankreich, Spanien und der Schweiz. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
Lichtermann, Paul. 1998. “What Do Movements Mean? The Value of Participant- Observation.” Qualitative Sociology 21(4):401–418.
Linards, Udris. 2009. “Politischer Extremismus und Radikalismus: Problematisierung und diskursive Gelegenheitsstrukturen. Eine Analyse der öffentlichen politischen Kommunikation der Schweiz am Beispiel des Rechtsextremismus.” Pp.62–90 in Düsseldorfer Forum Politische Kommunikation, Schriftenreihe DVPK Band 4, Dup, edited by W. Rodoniklis and D. Zander. Düsseldorf, Germany: Düsseldorf University Press.
Manning, Philipp K. 1982. “Structuralism and the Sociology of Knowledge.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 4(1):51–72.
McAdam, Doug. 1994. “Culture and Social Movements.” Pp.36–57 in New Social Movements. From Ideology to Identity, edited by E. Laraña, H. Johnston, and J.R. Gusfield. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Mead, Georg Herbert. 1963 [1934]. Mind, Self and Society, edited by C.W. Morris. Chicago, IL: University Press.
Oliver, Pamela and Hank Johnston. 2000. “What A Good Idea! Ideology and Frames in Social Movement Research.” Mobilization 4(1):37–54.
Pettenkofer, Andreas. 2010. Radikaler Protest. Zur soziologischen Theorie politischer Bewegungen. Frankfurt am Main, Germany; New York, NY: Campus.
Potter, Jonathan and Margaret Wetherell. 1998. “Social Representations, Discourse Analysis, and Racism.” Pp.138–155 in The Psychology of the Social, edited by U. Flick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rohe, Karl. 1990. “Politische Kultur und ihre Analyse. Probleme und Perspektiven der politischen Kulturforschung.” Historische Zeitschrift (250):321–346.
Sandberg, Sveinung. 2006. “Fighting Neo-liberalism with Neo-liberal Discourse. ATTAC Norway, Foucault and Collective Action Framing.” Social Movement Studies 5(3):209–227.
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth New Institutionalism.” European Political Science Review 2(1):1–25.
Snow, David A. and Robert D. Benford. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance and Participant Mobilization.” Pp.197–218 in From Structure to Action. Comparing Social Movements across Cultures, vol. 1, International Social Movement Research, edited by B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, and S. Tarrow. Greenwich, CT: JAI-Press.
Snow, David, Burke Rochford Jr., Steve Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51(4):464–481.
Strauss, Anselm L. 1979. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Strauss, Anselm L. 1991. Creating Sociological Awareness: Collective Images and Symbolic Representation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.
Strauss, Anselm L. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Teune, Simon. 2008. ‘“Gibt es so etwas überhaupt noch?’ Forschung zu Protest und sozialen Bewegungen.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 49(3):528–547.
Thomas, William I. and Dorothy S. Thomas. 1928. The Child in America. New York, NY: Knopf.
Ullrich, Peter. 2008. Die Linke, Israel und Palästina. Nahostdiskurse in Großbritan- nien und Deutschland. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
Ullrich, Peter. 2010. “Preventionism and Obstacles for Protest in Neoliberalism: Linking Governmentality Studies and Protest Research.” Pp.14–23 in Prevent and Tame. Protest under (Self-)control, edited by F. Heßdörfer, A. Pabst, and P. Ullrich. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
Ullrich, Peter. 2011. “Antisemitismus, Shoa und deutsche Verantwortung. Die (Nach-) Wirkungen des Nationalsozialismus im Nahostdiskurs.” Pp.23–38 in Königsweg der Befreiung oder Sackgasse der Geschichte? BDS – Boykott, Desinvestition und Sanktionen. Annäherungen an eine aktuelle Nahostdebatte, edited by K. Vogler, M. Vorberg, and P. Ullrich. Berlin, Germany: Aphorisma.
Ullrich, Peter. 2012. “Kulturvergleich, diskursive Gelegenheitsstrukturen und linke Nahostdiskurse. Entwurf einer wissenssoziologischen und diskurstheoretischen Perspektive für die Protestforschung.” Pp.315–337 in Methodologie und Praxis der Wissenssoziologischen Diskursanalyse, Vol. 1, Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven, edited by R. Keller and I. Truschkat. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
Ullrich, Peter. and Anja Lê. 2011. “Bilder der Überwachungskritik.” Kriminologisches Journal 43(2):112–130.
Weber, Max. [1904/1905] 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Winkler, Jürgen R. 2001. “Rechtsextremismus. Gegenstand — Erklärungsansätze — Grundprobleme.” Pp.38–68 in Rechtsextremismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland – Eine Bilanz, edited by W. Schubarth and R. Stöss. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
Zuckermann, Moshe. 1999. Gedenken und Kulturindustrie. Berlin, Germany: Philo Verlagsgesellschaft.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Peter Ullrich and Reiner Keller
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ullrich, P., Keller, R. (2014). Comparing Discourse between Cultures: A Discursive Approach to Movement Knowledge. In: Baumgarten, B., Daphi, P., Ullrich, P. (eds) Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385796_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385796_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48140-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38579-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)