Skip to main content

“I Was Both Lutheran and Orthodox”

Evacuee Karelian Orthodox Women, Bidenominational Families, and the Making of Religion

  • Chapter
Finnish Women Making Religion

Abstract

Finland has an Orthodox Christian minority that constitutes approximately 1 percent of the population.1 Since World War II, a great majority of the Orthodox Finns have married outside their denomination and into the Lutheran one. Furthermore, especially during the first decades after the war, most children born to Orthodox-Lutheran families were baptized into the dominant Lutheran faith. As a result, Orthodox women in these so-called mixed marriages commonly became the sole Orthodox members of their adult families.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Rosemary Breger and Rosanna Hill, “Introducing Mixed Marriages,” in Cross-Cultural Marriage: Identity and Choice, ed. Rosemary Breger and Rosanna Hill (Oxford: Berg, 1998), 7; Johanna Järvinen-Tassopoulos, “Kreikkalais- suomalainen avioliitto: Neuvottelua kahden kulttuurin leikkauspisteissä,” in Monikulttuuriset avioliitot sillanrakentajina, ed. Elli Heikkilä et al. (Turku: Siirtolaisinstituutti, 2004), 28–29. It is, nevertheless, applied here for the reason that it is generally used when referring to Orthodox-Lutheran marriages in Finland and in the Finnish Orthodox community. Moreover, it was also used by the women who were interviewed for this study.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Linda Woodhead, “Gender Differences in Religious Practice and Significance,” in The Sage Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, ed. James A. Beckford and N. J. Demerath III (Los Angeles: SAGE, 2007), 568–69, 581.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Randi R. Warne, “Gender,” in Guide to the Study of Religion, ed. Willi Braun and Russell T. McCutcheon (London: Cassell, 2000), 149–50.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jan Löfström, “Changing Conceptions of Gender Polarity in Finland: From Rural to Urban Culture,” in Gender and Folklore: Perspectives on Finnish and Karelian Culture, ed. Satu Apo, Aili Nenola, and Laura Stark-Arola (Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 1998), 249–50; Anu Pylkkänen, “Suomalainen tasa-arvo,” in Suomalainen nainen, by Satu Apo et al. (Helsinki: Otava, 1999), 26, 31–33; Liisa Rantalaiho, “Sukupuolisopimus ja Suomen malli,” in Naisten hyvinvointivaltio, ed. Anneli Anttonen, Lea Henriksson, and Ritva Nätkin (Tampere: Vastapaino, 1994), 16–17, 20–21, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marja-Liisa Keinänen, “Introduction,” in Perspectives on Women’s Everyday Religion, ed. Marja-Liisa Keinänen (Stockholm: Stockholm University, 2010); Susan S. Sered, Priestess, Mother, Sacred Sister: Religions Dominated by Women (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ulrich Beck and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim, Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences (London: SAGE, 2002), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eeva Sointu and Linda Woodhead, “Spirituality, Gender, and Expressive Selfhood,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47 (2008): 260, 267; Woodhead, “Gender Differences,” 572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heikki Waris et al., Siirtoväen sopeutuminen: Tutkimus Suomen karjalaisen siirtoväen sosiaalisesta sopeutumisesta (Helsinki: Otava, 1952), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tapio Hämynen, “Talvi-ja jatkosodan väestönsiirrot Suomessa,” in Suoma- laisen arjen historia 4: Hyvinvoinnin Suomi, ed. Anssi Mäkinen et al. (Helsinki: Weilin+Göös, 2008), 39–41; Heli K. Kananen, Kontrolloitu sopeutuminen: Ortodoksinen siirtoväki sotien jälkeisessä Ylä-Savossa (1946–1959) (Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2010), 63–101; Heikki Koukkunen, Tuiskua ja tyventä: Suomen ortodoksinen kirkko 1918–1978 (Heinävesi: Valamon luostari, 1982), 100, 119–20, 123–29; Teuvo Laitila, “Epäluuloja, välin- pitämättömyyttä ja arvostusta: Ortodoksis-luterilaiset suhteet Suomessa toisen maailmansodan jälkeen ortodoksisesta näkökulmasta,” in Terve sielu terveessä ruumiissa: Juhlakirja professori Paavo Kettusen täyttäessä 60 vuotta 27.11.2009, ed. Hannu Mustakallio (Joensuu: Karjalan Teologinen Seura, 2009), 341–43; Teuvo Laitila, “History of the Finnish Orthodox Church in the 20th Century,” in A Short History of the Orthodox Church in Western Europe in the 20th Century, ed. Christine Chaillot (Paris: Inter-Orthodox Dialogue, 2006), 168–69. Starting from the 1960s, the status of the Orthodox Church within Finnish society began to improve (legally the Orthodox Church has had the status of a state church since the early years of Finland’s independence). Today, Orthodox Christianity is generally considered an esteemed part of the Finnish cultural and religious landscape. Voitto Huotari, “Orthodox-Lutheran Intermarriage in Finland,” Social Compass 38 (1991): 29; Heikki Huttunen, “Witnessing in a Secular Situation: Reflections on the Orthodox Church of Finland,” Ortodoksia 49 (2002): 199; Kääriäinen, Niemelä, and Ketola, Moderni kirkkokansa, 144–45; Laitila, “Epäluuloja”; Laitila, “History,” 169–73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Voitto Huotari, Ortodoksin ja luterilaisen avioliitto: Tutkimus uskonto- ja perhetekijöiden vuorovaikutuksesta seka-avioliitoissa Ilomantsissa, Pohjois-Savossa ja Helsingissä (Helsinki: Suomalainen Teologinen Kirjallisuusseura, 1975), 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also Eeva Jokinen, Aikuisten arki (Helsinki: Gaudeamus, 2005), 50–51; Matti Kortteinen, Kunnian kenttä: Suomalainen palkkatyö kulttuurisena muotona (Helsinki: Hanki ja jää, 1992), 47–48, 63–72; Harriet Strandell, “Kolmen naissukupolven kokemuksia työstä ja perheestä,” in Perhe, työ ja tunteet: Ristiriitoja ja ratkaisuja, ed. Elina Haavio-Mannila, Riitta Jallinoja, and Harriet Strandell (Porvoo: WSOY, 1984), 212–17, 258–64, 276–77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marjatta Jaanu-Schröder, “Perinteiden siirtäminen perheessä,” in Ekumeeninen perhekirja, ed. Marjatta Jaanu-Schröder, Tarja Lehmuskoski, and Pirjo Työrinoja (Helsinki: Suomen ekumeeninen neuvosto, 1995), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pentti Laasonen, Yhteisellä tiellä: Luterilainen kirkko jakamattoman perinteen kantajana (Helsinki: Kirjapaja, 2011), 39–43; Laitila, “Epaluuloja,” 344.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Helena Kupari, “‘Remembering God’ through Religious Habits: The Daily Religious Practices of Evacuee Karelian Orthodox Women,” Temenos: Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion 47 (2011): 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Orit Avishai, “‘Doing Religion’ in a Secular World: Women in Conservative Religions and the Question of Agency,” Gender & Society 22 (2008): 424–25; Sointu and Woodhead, “Spirituality,” 260, 271–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Susan S. Sered, Women as Ritual Experts: The Religious Lives of Elderly Jewish Women in Jerusalem (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Terhi Utriainen Päivi Salmesvuori

Copyright information

© 2014 Terhi Utriainen and Päivi Salmesvuori

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kupari, H. (2014). “I Was Both Lutheran and Orthodox”. In: Utriainen, T., Salmesvuori, P. (eds) Finnish Women Making Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383471_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics