Abstract
We tend to conceptualize perceptual illusions as mistakes: illusions get the perceived object wrong. Developing insights from Merleau-Ponty, in the first section I challenge this view by elucidating some key experiential characteristics of illusory phenomena, to emphasize how the concept of illusions-as-mistakes relies on perspectives unavailable within illusory experiences. This perspective inclines us to introduce extrinsic, fixed norms, according to which illusions are mistakes. Described from within experience, an illusory phenomenon is not a case of mistakenly perceiving X as Y, it is rather a way that X makes a different kind of sense, in virtue of a norm that is not a fixed, objective standard, but is engendered within and endogenous to ongoing dynamics inherent in living, perceptual behavior.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Armel, K.C., Ramachandran, V.S. (2003) ‘Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 270, 1499–1506.
Botvinick, M. (2004) ‘Probing the neural basis of body ownership’, Science, 305, 782–3.
Botvinick, M., Cohen, J. (1998) ‘Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see’, Nature, 391, 756.
Carman, T. (2005) ‘Sensation, judgment, and the phenomenal field’ in T. Carman, M.B.N. Hansen (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 50–73.
De Vignemont, F. (2011) ‘Embodiment, ownership and disownership’, Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 82–93.
Ehrsson, H.H., Holmes, N.P., Passingham, R.E. (2005) ‘Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas’, Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10564–73.
Ehrsson, H.H., Spence, C., Passingham, R.E. (2004) ‘That’s my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb’, Science, 305, 875–7.
Gallagher, S. (2004) ‘Agency, ownership, and alien control in schizophrenia’ in D. Zahavi, T. Grünbaum, J. Parnas (eds) The Structure And Development Of Self-Consciousness: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins), pp. 89–104.
Goodwin, B.C. (2006) ‘Developmental emergence, genes, and responsible science’ in E.M. Neumann-Held, C. Rehmann-Sutter (eds) Genes in Development: Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), pp. 337–48.
Gordon, D. (2010) Ant Encounters: Interaction Networks and Colony Behavior (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Guterstam, A., Gentile, G., Ehrsson, H.H. (2013) ‘The invisible hand illusion: multisensory integration leads to the embodiment of a discrete volume of empty space’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1078–99.
Guterstam, A., Petkova, V.I., Ehrsson, H.H. (2011) ‘The illusion of owning a third arm’, PLoS ONE, 6, e17208.
Hass, L. (2008) Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
Husserl, E. (2001) Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
Kelly, S.D. (2002) ‘Merleau-Ponty on the body’, Ratio, 15, 376–91.
Kelly, S.D. (2005) ‘Seeing things in Merleau-Ponty’ in T. Carman, M.B.N. Hansen (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 74–110.
Kelso, J.A.S. (1999) Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003) L’institution/la passivité: Notes de cours au Collège de France (1954–1955) (Paris: Editions Belin).
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010) Institution and Passivity: Course Notes From the Collège de France (1954–1955) (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012) Phenomenology of Perception (London: Routledge).
Morris, D. (2008) ‘Body’, in R. Diprose, J. Reynolds (eds) Merleau-Ponty: Key Concepts (Stocksfield: Acumen), pp. 111–20.
Noë, A. (2012) Varieties of Presence (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Petkova, V.I., Ehrsson, H.H. (2008) ‘If I were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping’, PLoS ONE, 3, e3832.
Romdenh-Romluc, K. (2011) Merleau-Ponty and Phenomenology of Perception (London: Routledge).
Schmalzl, L., Ehrsson, H.H. (2011) ‘Experimental induction of a perceived “telescoped” limb using a full-body illusion’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 34.
Schmalzl, L., Thomke, E., Ragnö, C., Nilseryd, M., Stockselius, A., Ehrsson, H.H. (2011) ‘“Pulling telescoped phantoms out of the stump”: manipulating the perceived position of phantom limbs using a full-body illusion’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 121.
Slatman, J. (2009) ‘A strange hand: on self-recognition and recognition of another’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 321–42.
Talero, M. (2008) ‘The experiential workspace and the limits of empirical investigation’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16, 453–72.
Talero, M. (2012) ‘Joint attention and expressivity: a Heideggerian guide to the limits of empirical investigation’ in J. Kiverstein, M. Wheeler (eds) Heidegger and Cognitive Science (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 246–75.
Thelen, E., Smith, L.B. (1994) A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Tsakiris, M., Prabhu, G., Haggard, P. (2006) ‘Having a body versus moving your body: how agency structures body-ownership’, Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 423–32.
Turner, S. (2011) ‘Termites as models of swarm cognition’, Swarm Intelligence, 5, 19–43.
Van der Hoort, B., Guterstam, A., Ehrsson, H.H. (2011) ‘Being Barbie: the size of one’s own body determines the perceived size of the world’, PLoS ONE, 6, e20195.
West-Eberhard, M.J. (2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 David Morris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morris, D. (2015). Illusions and Perceptual Norms as Spandrels of the Temporality of Living. In: Doyon, M., Breyer, T. (eds) Normativity in Perception. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377920_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377920_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56782-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37792-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)