Skip to main content

Illusions and Perceptual Norms as Spandrels of the Temporality of Living

  • Chapter
Normativity in Perception

Part of the book series: New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science ((NDPCS))

Abstract

We tend to conceptualize perceptual illusions as mistakes: illusions get the perceived object wrong. Developing insights from Merleau-Ponty, in the first section I challenge this view by elucidating some key experiential characteristics of illusory phenomena, to emphasize how the concept of illusions-as-mistakes relies on perspectives unavailable within illusory experiences. This perspective inclines us to introduce extrinsic, fixed norms, according to which illusions are mistakes. Described from within experience, an illusory phenomenon is not a case of mistakenly perceiving X as Y, it is rather a way that X makes a different kind of sense, in virtue of a norm that is not a fixed, objective standard, but is engendered within and endogenous to ongoing dynamics inherent in living, perceptual behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armel, K.C., Ramachandran, V.S. (2003) ‘Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 270, 1499–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. (2004) ‘Probing the neural basis of body ownership’, Science, 305, 782–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M., Cohen, J. (1998) ‘Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see’, Nature, 391, 756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, T. (2005) ‘Sensation, judgment, and the phenomenal field’ in T. Carman, M.B.N. Hansen (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 50–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vignemont, F. (2011) ‘Embodiment, ownership and disownership’, Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrsson, H.H., Holmes, N.P., Passingham, R.E. (2005) ‘Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas’, Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10564–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrsson, H.H., Spence, C., Passingham, R.E. (2004) ‘That’s my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb’, Science, 305, 875–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2004) ‘Agency, ownership, and alien control in schizophrenia’ in D. Zahavi, T. Grünbaum, J. Parnas (eds) The Structure And Development Of Self-Consciousness: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins), pp. 89–104.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B.C. (2006) ‘Developmental emergence, genes, and responsible science’ in E.M. Neumann-Held, C. Rehmann-Sutter (eds) Genes in Development: Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), pp. 337–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (2010) Ant Encounters: Interaction Networks and Colony Behavior (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guterstam, A., Gentile, G., Ehrsson, H.H. (2013) ‘The invisible hand illusion: multisensory integration leads to the embodiment of a discrete volume of empty space’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1078–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guterstam, A., Petkova, V.I., Ehrsson, H.H. (2011) ‘The illusion of owning a third arm’, PLoS ONE, 6, e17208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass, L. (2008) Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (2001) Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S.D. (2002) ‘Merleau-Ponty on the body’, Ratio, 15, 376–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S.D. (2005) ‘Seeing things in Merleau-Ponty’ in T. Carman, M.B.N. Hansen (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 74–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J.A.S. (1999) Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003) L’institution/la passivité: Notes de cours au Collège de France (1954–1955) (Paris: Editions Belin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010) Institution and Passivity: Course Notes From the Collège de France (1954–1955) (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012) Phenomenology of Perception (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (2008) ‘Body’, in R. Diprose, J. Reynolds (eds) Merleau-Ponty: Key Concepts (Stocksfield: Acumen), pp. 111–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (2012) Varieties of Presence (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petkova, V.I., Ehrsson, H.H. (2008) ‘If I were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping’, PLoS ONE, 3, e3832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romdenh-Romluc, K. (2011) Merleau-Ponty and Phenomenology of Perception (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalzl, L., Ehrsson, H.H. (2011) ‘Experimental induction of a perceived “telescoped” limb using a full-body illusion’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalzl, L., Thomke, E., Ragnö, C., Nilseryd, M., Stockselius, A., Ehrsson, H.H. (2011) ‘“Pulling telescoped phantoms out of the stump”: manipulating the perceived position of phantom limbs using a full-body illusion’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatman, J. (2009) ‘A strange hand: on self-recognition and recognition of another’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 321–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talero, M. (2008) ‘The experiential workspace and the limits of empirical investigation’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16, 453–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talero, M. (2012) ‘Joint attention and expressivity: a Heideggerian guide to the limits of empirical investigation’ in J. Kiverstein, M. Wheeler (eds) Heidegger and Cognitive Science (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 246–75.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., Smith, L.B. (1994) A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris, M., Prabhu, G., Haggard, P. (2006) ‘Having a body versus moving your body: how agency structures body-ownership’, Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (2011) ‘Termites as models of swarm cognition’, Swarm Intelligence, 5, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoort, B., Guterstam, A., Ehrsson, H.H. (2011) ‘Being Barbie: the size of one’s own body determines the perceived size of the world’, PLoS ONE, 6, e20195.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M.J. (2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 David Morris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morris, D. (2015). Illusions and Perceptual Norms as Spandrels of the Temporality of Living. In: Doyon, M., Breyer, T. (eds) Normativity in Perception. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377920_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics