Abstract
The framers of the American Constitution believed that a core function of government is the protection of private property rights. Early in the deliberations of the Philadelphia convention, James Madison urged that “[t]he primary objects of civil society are the security of property and public safety.”1 Alexander Hamilton said that “one great objt. Of Govt. Is personal protection and the security of Property.”2 Everyone else who spoke on the subject concurred, with the exception of James Wilson who “could not agree that property was the sole or the primary object of Governt. & Society,” rather it was “[t]he cultivation & improvement of the human mind was the most noble object.”3 But even Wilson did not disagree that protection of property was an important governmental function.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Charles A. Beard, An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States (1913).
Woody Holton, Unruly Americans and the Origins of the Constitution (2007).
Bernard Siegan, Economic Liberties and the Constitution 42 (1980).
Jan Laitos, Law of Property Rights Protection 1–18 (2007 Supp).
Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously 269 (1977).
See John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust (1980).
Copyright information
© 2013 James L. Huffman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huffman, J.L. (2013). Economic Liberties and the Presumption of Constitutionality. In: Private Property and the Constitution. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376732_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376732_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47775-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37673-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)