Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Being Mindful about Misunderstandings in Languaging: Making Sense of Non-Sense as the Way to Sharing Linguistic Meaning

  • Chapter
Enactive Cognition at the Edge of Sense-Making

Part of the book series: New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science ((NDPCS))

Summary

This chapter considers the ethical and epistemological consequences of the enactive notion of “languaging” as whole-bodied, intersubjec- tive sense-making. Making sense in language is defined as a process of moving from stable, shared sense, through idiosyncratic non-sense, to a locally produced, co-available or interactively afforded sense. Enactive concepts of autonomy, autopoiesis, adaptivity, and precariousness imply radical idiosyncrasy in how individuals incorporate the means and moves needed to cope in enlanguaged environments. Differences in sense-making style s predict misunderstanding in social interactions. How do participants of linguistic sense-making share meaning? Presenting meaning as a consequence of mindfulness and misunderstanding, this chapter attempts to include the interiority and variety of experience in descriptions of linguistic participatory sense-making. It gives semantic weight to particularity without losing sight of interactional sources of normativity and intentionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel, K. O. (1976). The transcendental conception of language communication and the idea of a first philosophy. In H. Panet (Ed.), The History of Linguistic Thought ana Contemporary Linguistics (pp. 32–61). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1961). Philosophical Papers. (J. O. Urmson, & G. J. Warnock, Eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barandiaran, X., & Moreno, A. (2008). Adaptivity: from metabolism to behavior. Adaptive behavior, 16(5), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottineau, D. (2010). Language and enaction. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp. 267–306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottineau, D. (2012a). Remembering voice past: languaging as an embodied interactive cognitive technique. In Gumanitarniye chteniya RGGU-2012: Teoriya i metodoligiya gumanitamogo znaniya: Sbornik materialov [Readings in Humanities RSUH-2012: Theory and Methodology of Humanitarian Knowledge: Conference Proceedings] (pp. 194–219).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottineau, D. (2012b). Thinking the present together in natural languages. In E. I. Pivovar, & V. I. Zabotkina (Eds), Präsens (pp. 189–223). Moscow: OLMA Media-Group Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. B. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, ana Discursive Commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1923/1999). I and Thou. (R. G. Smith, Trans.). Edinburgh: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of Meaning in Gesture. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caveil, S. (1979/1999). The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J. (2011). Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuffari, E., Di Paolo, E. A., & De Jaegher, H. (under review). Participatory Sense-Making to Language: There and Back Again.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuffari, E., & Jensen, T. W. (2014). Living bodies: co-enacting experience. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds), Body — Language — Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (vol. 2, pp. 2016–2025). Berlin: de Grayter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N., & Richardson, D. (2014). The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 43–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, H. (2003). Locke on private language. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 11(4), 609–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jaegher, H., & Froese, T. (2009). On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive behavior, 17(5), 444–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Paolo, E. A. (2009). Extended life. Topoi, 28(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: values, social interaction, and play. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp. 33–87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froese, T. (2011). From second-order cybernetics to enactive cognitive science: Varela’s turn from epistemology to phenomenology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 28(6), 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froese, T, & Di Paolo, E. A. (2011). The enactive approach: theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froese, T, & Stewart, J. (2010). Life after Ashby: ultrastability and the autopoietic foundations of biological autonomy. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 17(4), 7–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froese, T, & Stewart, J. (2012). Enactive cognitive science and biology of cognition: a response to Humberto Maturana. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 19(4), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusaroli, R., Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C, & Tylén, K. (2012). Coming to ternis: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychological Science, 23(8), 931–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2012). Carving language for social coordination: a dynamical approach. Interaction Studies, 13(1), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, A. H. (1932). The Theory of Speech and Language. Oxford: The Clarendon ress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 292–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. (1962). Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning: A Philosophical and Psychological Approach to the Subjective. Evanston, IL: Northwest University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1997). How philosophy cannot appeal to experience, and how it can. In E. T. Gendlin, & D. M. Levin (Eds), Language beyond Postmodernism: Saying and Thinking in Gendlin’s Philosophy (pp. 3–41). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981/1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998). On the Pragmatics of Communication. (M. Cooke, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2003). Truth and justification. (B. Fultner, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1980). The Language-Makers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Beingand Time. (J. Macquanie &E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (2000). AII about Love: New Visions. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1950/1999). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. (D. Cairns, Trans.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, T. W. (in preparation). Emotion in languaging: an ecological approach to the intertwined nature of language and emotion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2007). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., & Rohrer, T. (2007). We are live creatures: embodiment, American pragmatism, and the cognitive organism. In T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev, & R. M. Frank (Eds), Body, Language and Mind. Volume 1: Embodiment (pp. 17–54). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1966/2001). The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (2013). Exploring the utterance roles of visible bodily action: a personal account. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds), Body — Language — Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 7–28). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, C. (2009). Pragmatism as Transition: Historicity and Hope in James, Dewey and Rorty. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, C. (2011). Rorty’s linguistic turn: why (more than) language matters to philosophy. Contemporary Pragmatism, 8(1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko, A. (2011). How Humberto Maturana’s biology of cognition can revive the language sciences. Constructivist Foundations, 6(3), 352–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyselo, M. (2012). From body to self — towards a socially enacted autonomy with implications for locked-in syndrome and schizophrenia. Osnabrück University, Dissertation, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear, J. (2006). Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. G. (1999). Philosophy of Language: An Introductory Text. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: the epistemology of reality. In G. A. Miller, & E. Lenneberg (Eds), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. (2011). Ultrastability...autopoiesis? Reflective response to Tom Froese and John Stewart. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 18(1-2), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., Mpodozis, J., & Letelier, J. C. (1995). Brain, language and the origin of human mental functions. Biological Research, 28, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F.J. (1980). A utopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self & Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). The Prose of the World. (C. Lefort, Ed., & J. O’Neill, Trans.) Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/2002). Phenomenology of Perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, S. (2007). The Conversation of Humanity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, C, & Tag, S. (2010). The dynamics of metaphor: foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 10(6), 85–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razaszek-Leonardi, J. (2012). Language as a system of replicable constraints. In H. H. Pattee, & J. Rczaszek-Leonardi (Eds), Laws, Language and Life (pp. 295–333). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. (1923/1954). The Nature of Sympathy. (P. Heath, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl, & M. Scriven (Eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. I, pp. 253–329). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, S. V (2012). Care and conversing in dialogical systems. Language Sciences, 34(5), 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (2010). Foundational issues in enaction as a paradigm for cognitive science: from the origin of life to consciousness and writing. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp. 1–31). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The Manu-facture of Meaning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taub, S. F. (2001). Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, P.J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: the distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 210–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virgo, N., Egbert, M. D., & Froese, T. (2011). The role of the spatial boundary in autopoiesis. In G. Kampis, I. Karsai, & E. Szathmâry (Eds), Advances in Artificial Life: Darwin Meets von Neumann. 10th European Conference, ECAL 2009 (pp. 234–241). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/2012). Thought and Language. (E. Hanf mann, & G. Vakar, Trans.; A. Kozulin, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, P. P. (2000). Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2001). Philosophical Investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwells.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Worcester State University, USA

    Elena Clare Cuffari (Assistant Professor of Philosophy)

Authors
  1. Elena Clare Cuffari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Massimiliano Cappuccio

  2. Universidad National Auionoma de Mexico, Mexico

    Tom Froese

Copyright information

© 2014 Elena Clare Cuffari

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cuffari, E.C. (2014). On Being Mindful about Misunderstandings in Languaging: Making Sense of Non-Sense as the Way to Sharing Linguistic Meaning. In: Cappuccio, M., Froese, T. (eds) Enactive Cognition at the Edge of Sense-Making. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363367_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation