Skip to main content

The Humanities and Open-Access Publishing: A New Paradigm of Value?

  • Chapter
Humanities in the Twenty-First Century
  • 219 Accesses

Abstract

Rick McGeer opens his chapter in this part of the book by declaring that digitisati on ‘represents the fourth great revolution in human communication, following the invention of language, the invention of writing, and the invention of the printing press’. In the spirit of a book that aspires to be agenda-setting for the arts and humanities within and outside of the academy, it seems fitting to close the collection of essays with reflections that contribute valuable insights to the lively discussion that is currently animating the international academic community. Although neither McGeer nor Olson makes this the direct and explicit object of his analysis, their chapters inevitably speak to the ongoing debates around the effects of digital technologies on both research — on which this present discussion will focus — and on teaching, as evidenced by the global interest in the potential offered by mass online open courses, or MOOCs, to democratise access to higher education. Central to reflections on the nature and potential of ‘digital scholarship’ is agreement around the importance of ensuring that as much as possible of the research produced within universities should be freely available digitally, especially when that research has been funded by public agencies. By way of an introduction to the discussion of the ethical and intellectual implications of digitisation for the arts and humanities that will follow, this chapter will present a contextual discussion and reflection on recent policy changes in relation to open-access scholarly publishing, mostly in the United Kingdom, but with a comparative glance at the United States’ experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BSA (2013) ‘Open access publishing: a guide on the current understanding for BSA members’, British Sociological Association, 18 January, http://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/49586/Open_Access_Publishing_a_guide_to_recent_policies_web.pdf [Accessed 6 February 2013].

  • Boutang, Y. M. (2011) Cognitive Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, S. (2012) What Are Universities For? London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for the Defence of British Universities (CDBU) (2013) CDBU Finch & Open Access, 28 January, http://cdbu.org.uk/campaigns/open-access/ [Accessed 6 February 2013].

  • Deuze, M. (2007) ‘Convergence culture in the creative industries’, in International Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 243–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012a) ‘Commission recommendation on access to and preservation of scientific information of 17 July 2012’, OJ L-194 of 21 July, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012b) ‘Scientific data: open access to research results will boost Europe’s innovation capacity’, Press release: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12–790_en.htm [Accessed on 30 January 2013].

  • Eve, M. (2012) ‘Open access journals: are we asking the right questions?’ Guardian ’s Higher Education Network blog, 8 February, http://www.guardian.co.uk/higher-education-network/blog/2012/feb/08/open-access-journals-elsvier-boycott [Accessed 2 February 2013].

  • Eve, M. (2013) ‘Open library of humanities: a community-grounded approach to academic publishing’, in LSE Impact of Social Science Blog, 29 January, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/01/29/open-library-of-humanities/ [Accessed 8 February 2013].

  • Harpham, G. G. (2011) The Humanities and the Dream of America, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondalgh, D. (2007) The Cultural Industries, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, A. (2012) ‘Academic spring: how an angry maths blog sparked a scientific revolution’, Guardian, 9 April, http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/apr/09/frustrated-blogpost-boycott-scientific-journals [Accessed 30 January 2013].

  • Kansa, E. (2012) ‘Openness and archaeology’s information ecosystem’, World Archaeology, 44(4), 498–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, J. (2013) ‘Unexpected martyr for the open-access movement’, Times Higher Education, 24–30 January, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, H. (2012) Freedom for scholarship in the internet age, PhD thesis, Burnaby: Simon Fraser University, http://pages.cmns.sfu.ca/heather-morrison/files/2012/12/Morrison-library-copy.pdf [Accessed 14 February 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2004) ‘The architecture of participation’, http://oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/articles/architecture_of_participation.html [Accessed 21 January 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Councils UK (2012) Research Councils UK Policy on Access to Research Outputs, http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUK%20_Policy_on_Access_to_Research_Outputs.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2013].

  • Sample, I. (2012) ‘Harvard University says it can’t afford journal publishers’ prices’, Guardian, 24 April, http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/apr/24/harvard-university-journal-publishers-prices [Accessed 4 February 2013].

  • Schlesinger, P. (2013) ‘Expertise, the academy and cultural policy’, in Media, Culture and Society, 35(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suber, P. (2012) Open Access, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suber, P. (2005) ‘The Wellcome Trust OA mandate takes effect’, in SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 2 October, http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/10–02–05.htm [Accessed on 27 January 2013].

  • Weller, M. (2011) The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice, London: Bloosmbury Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waltham, M. (2009) The Future of Scholarly Journals Publishing Among Social Science and Humanities Associations, Washington, DC: National Humanities Alliance. http://www.nhalliance.org/bm~doc/hssreport.pdf [Accessed on 30 January 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. (2013) Consuming Higher Education: Why Learning Can’t Be Bought, London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willinsky, J. (2006) The Access Principle, Cambridge, MA: MIT. http://arizona.open-repository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/106529/1/jwapbook.pdf [Accessed on 30 January 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings [The Finch Report] (2012) Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. London: Research Information Network.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Eleonora Belfiore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belfiore, E. (2013). The Humanities and Open-Access Publishing: A New Paradigm of Value?. In: Belfiore, E., Upchurch, A. (eds) Humanities in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361356_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics