Abstract
Rick McGeer opens his chapter in this part of the book by declaring that digitisati on ‘represents the fourth great revolution in human communication, following the invention of language, the invention of writing, and the invention of the printing press’. In the spirit of a book that aspires to be agenda-setting for the arts and humanities within and outside of the academy, it seems fitting to close the collection of essays with reflections that contribute valuable insights to the lively discussion that is currently animating the international academic community. Although neither McGeer nor Olson makes this the direct and explicit object of his analysis, their chapters inevitably speak to the ongoing debates around the effects of digital technologies on both research — on which this present discussion will focus — and on teaching, as evidenced by the global interest in the potential offered by mass online open courses, or MOOCs, to democratise access to higher education. Central to reflections on the nature and potential of ‘digital scholarship’ is agreement around the importance of ensuring that as much as possible of the research produced within universities should be freely available digitally, especially when that research has been funded by public agencies. By way of an introduction to the discussion of the ethical and intellectual implications of digitisation for the arts and humanities that will follow, this chapter will present a contextual discussion and reflection on recent policy changes in relation to open-access scholarly publishing, mostly in the United Kingdom, but with a comparative glance at the United States’ experience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BSA (2013) ‘Open access publishing: a guide on the current understanding for BSA members’, British Sociological Association, 18 January, http://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/49586/Open_Access_Publishing_a_guide_to_recent_policies_web.pdf [Accessed 6 February 2013].
Boutang, Y. M. (2011) Cognitive Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.
Collini, S. (2012) What Are Universities For? London: Penguin Books.
Council for the Defence of British Universities (CDBU) (2013) CDBU Finch & Open Access, 28 January, http://cdbu.org.uk/campaigns/open-access/ [Accessed 6 February 2013].
Deuze, M. (2007) ‘Convergence culture in the creative industries’, in International Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 243–63.
European Commission (2012a) ‘Commission recommendation on access to and preservation of scientific information of 17 July 2012’, OJ L-194 of 21 July, p. 39.
European Commission (2012b) ‘Scientific data: open access to research results will boost Europe’s innovation capacity’, Press release: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12–790_en.htm [Accessed on 30 January 2013].
Eve, M. (2012) ‘Open access journals: are we asking the right questions?’ Guardian ’s Higher Education Network blog, 8 February, http://www.guardian.co.uk/higher-education-network/blog/2012/feb/08/open-access-journals-elsvier-boycott [Accessed 2 February 2013].
Eve, M. (2013) ‘Open library of humanities: a community-grounded approach to academic publishing’, in LSE Impact of Social Science Blog, 29 January, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/01/29/open-library-of-humanities/ [Accessed 8 February 2013].
Harpham, G. G. (2011) The Humanities and the Dream of America, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Hesmondalgh, D. (2007) The Cultural Industries, London: Sage.
Jha, A. (2012) ‘Academic spring: how an angry maths blog sparked a scientific revolution’, Guardian, 9 April, http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/apr/09/frustrated-blogpost-boycott-scientific-journals [Accessed 30 January 2013].
Kansa, E. (2012) ‘Openness and archaeology’s information ecosystem’, World Archaeology, 44(4), 498–520.
Marcus, J. (2013) ‘Unexpected martyr for the open-access movement’, Times Higher Education, 24–30 January, 18–19.
Morrison, H. (2012) Freedom for scholarship in the internet age, PhD thesis, Burnaby: Simon Fraser University, http://pages.cmns.sfu.ca/heather-morrison/files/2012/12/Morrison-library-copy.pdf [Accessed 14 February 2013].
O’Reilly, T. (2004) ‘The architecture of participation’, http://oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/articles/architecture_of_participation.html [Accessed 21 January 2013].
Research Councils UK (2012) Research Councils UK Policy on Access to Research Outputs, http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUK%20_Policy_on_Access_to_Research_Outputs.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2013].
Sample, I. (2012) ‘Harvard University says it can’t afford journal publishers’ prices’, Guardian, 24 April, http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/apr/24/harvard-university-journal-publishers-prices [Accessed 4 February 2013].
Schlesinger, P. (2013) ‘Expertise, the academy and cultural policy’, in Media, Culture and Society, 35(1), 27–35.
Suber, P. (2012) Open Access, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Suber, P. (2005) ‘The Wellcome Trust OA mandate takes effect’, in SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 2 October, http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/10–02–05.htm [Accessed on 27 January 2013].
Weller, M. (2011) The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice, London: Bloosmbury Academic.
Waltham, M. (2009) The Future of Scholarly Journals Publishing Among Social Science and Humanities Associations, Washington, DC: National Humanities Alliance. http://www.nhalliance.org/bm~doc/hssreport.pdf [Accessed on 30 January 2013].
Williams, H. (2013) Consuming Higher Education: Why Learning Can’t Be Bought, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Willinsky, J. (2006) The Access Principle, Cambridge, MA: MIT. http://arizona.open-repository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/106529/1/jwapbook.pdf [Accessed on 30 January 2013].
Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings [The Finch Report] (2012) Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. London: Research Information Network.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Eleonora Belfiore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Belfiore, E. (2013). The Humanities and Open-Access Publishing: A New Paradigm of Value?. In: Belfiore, E., Upchurch, A. (eds) Humanities in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361356_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361356_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-36663-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36135-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)