Skip to main content

Why Have Wage Shares Fallen? An Analysis of the Determinants of Functional Income Distribution

  • Chapter
Wage-led Growth

Part of the book series: Advances in Labour Studies ((AILS))

Abstract

In the last quarter century dramatic changes in income distribution have taken place. This refers to the personal distribution of income as well as to the functional distribution of income. Distribution has become more polarized in most OECD countries (OECD 2008, 2011), with the very top income groups increasing their income shares substantially in the Anglo-Saxon countries, in particular in the United States (Atkinson et al. 2011). Wage shares have fallen in virtually all OECD countries, with decreases typically being more pronounced in continental European countries (and Japan) than in the Anglo-Saxon countries. In the advanced economies1 the (adjusted) wage share has, on average, fallen from 73.4 in 1980 to 64.0 per cent in 2007 (Figure 2.1). The data for Germany are very similar (72.2 to 61.8); the decline is somewhat stronger in Japan (77.2 to 62.2) and a little weaker in the United States (70.0 to 64.9). Overall, real wage growth has clearly lagged behind productivity growth since around 1980. This constitutes a major historical change as wage shares had been stable or increasing in the post-war era.

The author is grateful to Hubert Kohler for excellent research assistance and to Matthieu Charpe, Vince Daly, Marc Lavoie, Özlem Onaran, Simon Mohun and Antonella Stirati for helpful comments and suggestions. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Regulating for Decent Work conference, ILO, Geneva and at Kingston University. All mistakes are, however, the author’s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argitis, G. and Pitelis, C. 2001. ‘Monetary policy and the distribution of income: evidence for the United States and the United Kingdom’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 23, pp. 617–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A., Piketty, T. and Saez, E. 2011. ‘Top incomes in the long run of history’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 49(1), pp. 3–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D., Katz, L. and Krueger, A.B. 1999. ‘Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, pp. 1169–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmat, G., Manning, A. and Van Reenen, J. 2007. ‘Privatization, entry regulation and the decline of labour’s share of GDP: A cross-country analysis of the network industries’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP6348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. and Katz, J.N. 1995. ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data’, American Political Science Review, vol. 89(3), pp. 634–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentolila, S. and Saint-Paul, G. 2003. ‘Explaining movements in the labor share’, in Contribution to Macroeconomics, vol. 3(1) (Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. and DiNardo, J.E. 2002. ‘Skill-based technological change and rising wage inequality: some problems and puzzles’, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 20(4), pp. 733–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daudey, E. and García-Penalosa, C. 2007. ‘The personal and the factor distributions of income in a cross-section of countries’, Journal of Development Studies, vol. 43(5), pp. 812–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A. 2006. ‘Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization’, Applied Economics, vol. 38(10), pp. 1091–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G. and Lévy, D. 2001. ‘Costs and benefits of Neoliberalism: a class analysis’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 8(4), pp. 578–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G. and Lévy, D. 2004. Capital Resurgent: Roots of the Neoliberal Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, G. and Burke, S. 2001. ‘Threat effects and the internationalization of production’, Political Economy Research Institute Working Papers 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertürk, L, Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A. and Williams, K., (eds). 2008. Financialization at Work: Key Texts and Commentary (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2007. ‘The labour income share in the European Union’, Chapter 5 in Employment in Europe (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R.C. and Hanson, G.H. 1997. ‘Foreign direct investment and relative wages: evidence from Mexico’s maquiladoras’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 42(3-4), pp. 371–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R.C. and Hanson, G.H. 1999. ‘The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: estimates for the United States, 1979–1990’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114(3), pp. 907–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P. and Pavcnik, N. 2007. ‘Distributional effects of globalization in developing countries’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 45(1), pp. 39–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollin, D. 2002. ‘Getting income shares right’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 110(April), pp. 458–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. 2002. Has globalization eroded labor’s share? Some cross-country evidence. Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, E. and Mundt, M. 2012. ‘Financialisation and the requirements and potentials for wage-led recovery — a review focussing on the G20’. Paper written for the project ‘New perspectives on wages and economic growth: the potentials of wage-led growth’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, E. and Schoder, C. 2011. ‘Interest rates, distribution and capital accumulation — a Post-Kaleckian perspective on the U.S. and Germany’, International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 25(6), pp. 693–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, E. and van Treeck, T. 2010. ‘“Financialisation” and rising shareholder power in Kaleckian/Post-Kaleckian models of distribution and growth’, Review of Political Economy, vol. 22(2), pp. 205–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. and Persyn, D. 2009. ‘Globalisation, concentration and footloose firms: in search of the main cause of the declining labour share’, LICOS Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper 229/2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (ILO). 2008. World of Work Report 2008: Income Inequalities in the Age of Financial Globalization (Geneva: ILO).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (ILO). 2011. ‘The labour share of income: determinants and potential contribution to exiting the financial crisis’, Chapter 3 in World of Work Report 2011: Making Markets Work for Jobs (Geneva: ILO).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2007a. ‘The globalization of labor’, Chapter 5 in World Economic Outlook, April 2007 (Washington, DC: IMF).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2007b. ‘Globalization and inequality’, Chapter 4 in World Economic Outlook, October 2007 (Washington, DC: IMF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayadev, A. 2007. ‘Capital account openness and the labour share of income’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 31, pp. 423–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W. and Palme, J. 2003. ‘New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95’, American Political Science Review, vol. 97(3), pp. 425–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. 1999. ‘Measuring labor’s share’, American Economic Review, vol. 89(2), pp. 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. and Milesi-Ferretti, G. 2007. ‘The external wealth of nations mark II: Revised and extended estimates of foreign assets and liabilities’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 73, pp. 23–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. and O’Sullivan, M. 2000. ‘Maximising shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance’, Economy and Society, vol. 29(1), pp. 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohun, S. 2006. ‘Distributive shares in the US economy, 1964–2001’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30(3), pp. 347–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2007. ‘OECD workers in the global economy: increasingly vulnerable?’, Chapter 3 of OECD Employment Outlook 2007 (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2011. Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Onaran, Ö. 2009. ‘Wage share, globalization and crisis: the case of the manufacturing industry in Korea, Mexico and Turkey’, International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 23(2), pp. 113–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onaran, Ö. 2011. ‘Globalisation, macroeconomic performance and distribution’, in E. Hein and E. Stockhammer (eds), A Modern Guide To Keynesian Macroeconomics and Economic Policies (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Onaran, Ö., Stockhammer, E. and Grafl, L. 2011. ‘Financialization, income distribution, and aggregate demand in the US’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 35(4), pp. 637–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. and Saez, E. 2003. ‘Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 118(1), pp. 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. and Saez, E. 2007. ‘Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998’, in A.B. Atkinson and T. Piketty (eds), Top Incomes in a Global Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, D., Epstein, G. and Abrena, M. 2003. ‘Trends in the rentier income share in OECD countries 1960–2000’, PERI Working Paper 58a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 1998. Capital mobility and labor. Manuscript. Available online at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~drodrik/capitalm.pdf.

  • Rossman, P. 2009. ‘Financialization and casualization of labour — building a trade union and regulatory response’. Paper presented at the Global Labour University Conference, Mumbai, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockhammer, E. 2004. ‘Financialization and the slowdown of accumulation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 28(5), pp. 719–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockhammer, E. 2009. ‘Determinants of functional income distribution in OECD countries’, IMK Studies 05–2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockhammer, E. 2010. ‘Financialization and the global economy’, Political Economy Research Institute Working Paper 242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockhammer, E. 2013. ‘Why have wage shares fallen? A panel analysis of the determinants of functional income distribution’, Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 35 (Geneva: ILO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolper, W. and Samuelson, P. 1941. ‘Protection and real wages’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 9, pp. 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, E. and Zacharias, A. 2007. Class Structure and Economic Inequality. Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

Datasets

  • AMECO: Annual macroeconomic database, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs, (link to dataset http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/user/serie/SelectSerie.cfin, accessed 15 June 2011).

  • Bassanini, A. and Duval, R. 2006. ‘Employment patterns in OECD countries: Reassessing the role of policies and institutions’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers 486. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • BGHS: Baker, D., Glyn, A., Howell, D. and Schmitt, J. 2005. ‘Labor market institutions and unemployment: a critical assessment of the cross-country evidence’, in D. Howell (ed.), Fighting Unemployment. The Limits for Free Market Orthodoxy (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Link: http://www.noapparentmotive.org/topics/BGHS_data.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO/IILS: ILO/IILS data on wage shares, supplied by M. Charpe. Penn World Tables: Heston, A., Summers, R., Aten, B. 2011. Penn World Table Version 7.0. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices, University of Pennsylvania, (link to dataset http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/Downloads/pwt70/pwt70_06032011version.zip, accessed 25 May 2011).

  • EU KLEMS: EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts: November 2009 Release, updated March 2011. (link to dataset http://www.euldems.net/index.htnil, accessed 17 July 2011).

  • IMF, 2010. World Economic Outlook Database, October 2010. (link to dataset http://www.imf.org/extemal/pübs/ft/weo/2010/02/weodata/download.aspx, accessed 21 February 2011).

  • IMF International Financial Statistics (IFS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, RR. and Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. 2007. ‘The external wealth of nations mark II: Revised and extended estimates of foreign assets and liabilities, 1970–2004’, journal of International Economics, vol. 73 (November), pp. 223–50 (link to dataset http://www.imf.org/extemal/pubs/ft/wp/2006/data/update/wp0669.zip, accessed 15 February 2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD: OECD.StatExtracts, http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx (accessed 18 April 2011).

  • United Nations Statistics Division, 2011. National Accounts Official Country Data, UNData Explorer, (link to dataset http://data.un.org/Explorer.aspx?d=SNA, accessed 18 April 2011).

  • UNIDO: INDSTAT3, Industrial Statistics Database (edition: 2006). (link to dataset http://dx.doi.org/10.5257/unido/indstat3/2006, accessed 18 April 2011).

  • World Bank World Development Indicators (WDI). (link to dataset http://data.world-bank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators, accessed 15 February 2011).

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 International Labour Organization

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stockhammer, E. (2013). Why Have Wage Shares Fallen? An Analysis of the Determinants of Functional Income Distribution. In: Lavoie, M., Stockhammer, E. (eds) Wage-led Growth. Advances in Labour Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137357939_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics