Skip to main content

Feminist Development Economics: An Institutional Approach to Household Analysis

  • Chapter
Under Development: Gender

Part of the book series: Gender, Development and Social Change ((GDSC))

Abstract

Gender in economics is no longer analysed exclusively in terms of gender inequalities in economic variables, such as employment or wages or as the differential impacts of economic processes and policies on men and women. Gender is also understood as, first, shaping market processes in terms of access to and control over resources, such as education or incomes, second, as shaping people’s choices, for example in segmented labour markets, and third, as being inherently part of macroeconomic trends, for example through fluctuations in the female labour force participation rate, or in responses to crises though increases in the supply of unpaid labour. So, gender is increasingly understood not only as an exogenous variable (coming from outside the economic system, from culture, social relations, nature, or laws), but also as endogenous — shaping and being shaped by particular economic processes, conditions and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agarwal, B. 1997. “Bargaining” and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household, Feminist Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizer, A. 2007. Wages, Violence and Health in the Household. NBER Working Paper 13494. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M. and Hill Collins, R 1997. Race, Class, and Gender: An Anthology. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, R. L. 1991. Gender, Family and Economy. The Friple Overlap. Newbury Park: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J. and Dwyer, D. 1988. A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Fhird World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. 1994. Onions are my Husband. Survival and Accumulation by West African Market Women. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cuesta, J. 2006. The Distributive Consequences of Machismo: A Simulation Analysis ol Intra-Household Discrimination, Journal of International Development, Vol. 18, pp. 1065–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, W. 1994. Institutionalism and Feminism. In J. Peterson and D. Brown (eds), The Economic Status of Women under Capitalism. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, W. 1996. Four Modes of Inequality. In W. M. Dugger (ed.), Inequality: Radical Institutionalist Views on Race, Gender, Class and Nation. Westport (Conn.): Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, D. 1999. Labour Markets as Gendered Institutions, World Development, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 611–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fapohunda, E. 1988. The Non-Pooling Household: A Challenge to Theory. In J. Bruce and D. Dwyer (eds), A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. 1994. Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gammage, S. 1997. Women’s Role in Household Decision Making: A Case Study in Nigeria. Washington DC: International Centre for Research on Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garikipati, S. 2008. The Impact of Lending to Women on Household Vulnerability and Women’s Empowerment: Evidence from India, World Development, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 2620–2642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, A. 1997. Getting Institutions Right for Women in Development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, A. and Sen Gupta, R. 1996. Who Takes the Credit? Gender, Power and Control over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programmes in Bangladesh, World Development, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, J. 1981. Household and Community in African Studies, African Studies Review, Vol. 24, No. 2/3, pp. 87–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S. 1995. Gender and Economics; Islam and Polygamy — A Question of Causality, Feminist Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss-White, B. 2000. Taking Gender: Social Institutions as Regulators of Markets. In A. van Tilburg, H. Moll and A, Kuyvenhoven (eds), Agricultural Markets Beyond Liberalization. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J. and Ciscel, D. 1996. Escaping the Fate of Sisyphus: Bargaining, Divorce, and Employment in the Patriarchal Family, Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. 1984. The Democratic Economy. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics. Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M. 1994. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, A. 1993. Public or Private? Institutional Economics and Feminism. In M. Ferber and J. Nelson (eds), Beyond Economic Man. Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. 1997. The Intra-Household Economics of Voice and Exit, Feminist Economics, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacPhail, F. and Dong, X.-Y. 2007. Women’s Market Work and Household Status in Rural China: Evidence from Jiangsu and Shandong in the late 1990s, Feminist Economics, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 93–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, M. and Parpart, J. 1995. Feminism, Postmodernism, Development (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. 2004. Gender as Social Institution, Social Torces, 82, No. 4, pp. 1249–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, A. 1999. Institutional Economics. In J. Peterson and M. Lewis (eds), The Elgar Companion to Feminist Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikièma, B., Haddad, S. and Potvin, L. 2008. Women Bargaining to Seek Healthcare: Norms, Domestic Practices, and Implications in Rural Burkina Faso, World Development, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 608–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Odebode, S. 2004. Husbands are Crowns. Livelihood Pathways of Low-Income Urban Yoruba Women in Ibadan, Nigeria. Maastricht: Shaker. PhD Dissertation, Institute of Social Studies and CERES Research School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odebode, S. and van Staveren, I. 2007. Gender Norms as Asymmetric Institutions. A Case Study of Yoruba Women in Nigeria, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 903–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, P. 1994. Feminism and Science Reconsidered: Insights from the Margins. In J. Peterson and D. Brown (eds), The Economic Status of Women under Capitalism. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. 1994. Introduction. In J. Peterson and D. Brown (eds), The Economic Status of Women under Capitalism. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, A. 1999. Micro-Credit Initiatives for Equitable and Sustainable Development: Who Pays? World Development, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sa’ad, A.-M. 2001. Traditional Institutions and the Violation of Women’s Human Rights in Africa: The Nigerian Case. In A. Rwomire (ed.), African Women and Children. Crisis and Response. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1990. Gender and Cooperative Conflicts. In I. Tinker (ed.), Persistent Inequalities. Women and World Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Institutions and Gender Index 2012. Available at: http://www.wikigender.org/index.php/Social_Institutions_and_Gender_Index_2012

  • Stevenson, B. and Wolfers, J. 2006. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Divorce Laws and Family Distress, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 121, No. 1, pp. 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Staveren, I. 2009. Making Resources More Effective for Women: Addressing Gendered Institutions, Report to UND AW for an expert consultation on the 2009 World Survey on the Role of Women in Development, 17–19 February, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Staveren, I. 2013. An Exploratory Cross-Country Analysis of Gendered Institutions, Journal of International Development, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. 1931[1899]. The Theory of the Leisure Class. An Economic Study of Institutions. In B. W. Huebsch (ed.), New York: The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. 1964. The Barbarian Status of Women. In L. Ardzrooni (ed.), Essays in Our Changing Order. New York: Augustus M. Kelley (reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. 1995. Compulsive Shift or Cultural Blind Drift? Literary Theory, Critical Rhetoric, Feminist Theory and Institutional Economics. In C. M. A. Clark (ed.), Institutional Economics and the Theory of Social Value: Essays in Honor of Marc R. Tool. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. and Jennings, A. 1990. On the Possibility of a Feminist Economics: The Convergence of Institutional and Feminist Methodology, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 613–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. and Smith, J. 1991. Households as an Institution of the World-Economy, In Gender, Family and Economy. The Triple Overlap, R. L. Blumberg (ed.), Newbury Park: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, C. and Whalen, L. 1994. Institutionalism: A Useful Foundation for Feminist Economics? In J. Peterson and D. Brown (eds), The Economic Status of Women Under Capitalism. Institutional Economics and Feminist Theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Olasunbo Odebode and Irene van Staveren

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Odebode, O., van Staveren, I. (2014). Feminist Development Economics: An Institutional Approach to Household Analysis. In: Verschuur, C., Guérin, I., Guétat-Bernard, H. (eds) Under Development: Gender. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137356826_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics