Abstract
In an influential account of Henry IV Part 1, Cleanth Brooks and Robert Heilman describe the play as “one of the wisest and fullest commentaries on human action possible [in] the comic mode... .” They go on, nev- ertheless, to conclude that “Shakespeare has no easy moral to draw, no simple generalization to make,” suggesting that in choosing the comic mode, Shakespeare opted to emphasize the ethical ambiguity of human actions over any guiding principle of moral propriety.1 Alternately, in his introduction to his Ar den 2 edition, A. R. Humphreys argues that the play does not fully embrace the moral ambiguity that Brooks and Heilman claim: “There is history here as well as comedy — history which requires responsible action.”2 Humphrey’s comment is prompted by his belief, shared by a range of critics, that Shakespeare had to side with Hal, with history, over both Hotspur’s misplaced valor and the endear- ing, but untenable misrule of the comic Falstaff. In Humphrey’s view, it is Hal’s action around which the play revolves: will the wayward prince act with the honor of an heir apparent? From this position all other action in the play is included to offer a contrast to Hal’s heroism, thus making coherent sense of the historical events that are Shakespeare’s subject.3 Hal’s victorious action in battle signifies his honor, and by implication, the divine justification of his cause.
Honour! tut, a breath: There’s no such thing, in nature: a mere term Invented to awe fools.
Jons on, Volpone
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Phyllis Rackin, Stages of History: Shakespeare’s English Chronicles (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990), 136.
David Scott Kastan, “‘The King Hath Many Marching in His Coats,’ Or What Did You Do in the War Daddy?” in ed. Ivo Kamps, Shakespeare Left and Right (New York: Routledge, 1991), 241–258
Paul Ricoeur, Oneself as Another, trans. Kathleen Blarney (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 140
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 James A. Knapp
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knapp, J.A. (2014). “Tis insensible then?”: Time, Language, and Action in 1 Henry IV. In: Cefalu, P., Kuchar, G., Reynolds, B. (eds) The Return of Theory in Early Modern English Studies, Volume II. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137351050_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137351050_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46866-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35105-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)