Skip to main content

Designing Accountability Regimes at the European Union Level

  • Chapter
Accountability and Regulatory Governance

Part of the book series: Executive Politics and Governance Series ((EXPOLGOV))

Abstract

The proliferation of agencies in the European Union (EU) during the last two decades has been one of the most remarkable transformations of executive politics and regulatory governance at the EU level, in the context of regulatory capitalism (Levi-Faur 2005; Levi-Faur and Jordana 2005). The first agencies were created in the mid-1970s and by 2014, following two more waves of agency creation in the early 1990s and during the 2000s, there were 35 operating on a stable basis. EU agencies cover a wide range of policy fields, including environmental protection, transport, food safety, occupational training, pharmaceuticals, internal market, asylum support, financial markets, defence and judicial cooperation. One of the most specific trends of EU agencies as compared to national ones is that none of them has been entrusted with genuine rule-making powers (Busuioc 2013). That said, agency configurations in the EU are manifold, with noticeable differences observed as regards tasks and institutional configurations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Behn, R.D. (2001) Rethinking Democratic Accountability (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A. (2005) Mind the Gap! European Integration between Level and Scope. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(2), 37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. (2007) Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. (2010) Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, C. (2013) Consensus and Compromise Become Ordinary–But at What Cost? A Critical Analysis of the Impact of the Changing Norms of Codecision upon European Parliament Committees. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 988–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, C., Rasmussen, A. and Reh, C. (2013) Legislative Codecision and Its Impact on the Political System of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busuioc, M. (2013) European Agencies: Law and Practices of Accountability (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, R., McCubbins, M. D. and Weingast, B. R. (1989) A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 588–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiti, E. (2009) An Important Part of the EU’s Institutional Machinery: Features, Problems and Perspectives of European Agencies. Common Market Law Review, 46, 1395–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J. G. and Nielsen, V. L. (2010) Administrative Capacity, Structural Choice and the Creation of EU Agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(2), 176–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, R. and Thomson, R. (2013) The Distribution of Power among EU Institutions: Who Wins under Codecision and Why? Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 1025–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crombez, C. (2003) The Democratic Deficit in the European Union: Much Ado about Nothing? European Union Politics, 4(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crombez, C., Steunenberg, B. and Corbett, R. (2000) Understanding the EU Legislative Process: Political Scientists’ and Practitioners’ Perspectives. European Union Politics, 1(3), 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, D. (2007) Holding (Quasi-) Autonomous EU Administrative Actors to Public Account. European Law Journal, 13(4), 523–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehousse, R. (2008) Delegation of Powers in the European Union: The Need for a Multi-Principals Model. West European Politics, 31(4), 789–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanretty, C. and Koop, C. (2013) Shall the Law Set them Free? The Formal and Actual Independence of Regulatory Agencies. Regulation & Governance, 7(2), 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. and Trondal, J. (2009) Political Leadership and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Effects of Agencification. Governance, 22(4), 673–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. and Trondal, J. (2011) EU-Level Agencies: New Executive Centre Formation or Vehicles for National Control? Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 868–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, M. A., Worsham, J. and Ringquist, E.J. (2006) Contemporary Regulatory Policy (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgie, R. and McMenamin, I. (2005) Credible Commitment, Political Uncertainty or Policy Complexity? Explaining Variations in the Independence of Nonmajoritarian Institutions in France. British Journal of Political Science, 35(3), 531–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, H. and Héritier, A. (2007) Introduction: Contested Competences in the European Union. West European Politics, 30(2), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006) Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franchino, F. (2000) Control of the Commission’s Executive Functions. European Union Politics, 1(1), 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchino, F. (2004) Delegating Powers in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, G., Tsebelis, G. and Corbett, R. (2001) The EU Legislative Process: Academics vs. Practitioners–Round 2. European Union Politics, 2(3), 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilardi, F. (2002) Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 873–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilardi, F. (2007) The Same, but Different: Central Banks, Regulatory Agencies, and the Politics of Delegation to Independent Authorities. Comparative European Politics, 5(3), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenleer, M. (2009) The Autonomy of European Union Agencies (Delft: Eburon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanretty, C. and Koop, C. (2013) Shall the Law Set them Free? The Formal and Actual Independence of Regulatory Agencies. Regulation & Governance, 7(2), 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2012) Institutional Change in Europe: Co-Decision and Comitology Transformed. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, K. and Shackleton, M. (2013) Codecision: A Practitioner’s View from Inside the Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 1040–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, R. D. (2002) The Politics of ‘Eurocratic’ Structure and the New European Agencies. West European Politics, 25(4), 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, R. D. and Tarrant, A. D. (2011) The Political Foundations of the Eurocracy. West European Politics, 34(5), 922–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluver, H. (2011) The Contextual Nature of Lobbying: Explaining Lobbying Success in the European Union. European Union Politics, 12(4), 483–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop, C. (2011) Explaining the Accountability of Independent Agencies: The Importance of Political Salience. Journal of Public Policy, 31(2), 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreppel, A. (2002) Moving Beyond Procedure. An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence. Comparative Political Analysis, 35(7), 784–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. and J. Jordana (2005) Globalizing Regulatory Capitalism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 6–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. and Jordana, J. (2005) The Rise of Regulatory Capitalism: The Global Diffusion of a New Order. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 200–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. (2011) The European Parliament and the Legitimation of Agencification. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 909–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. and Pollak, J. (2010) Representation and Accountability: Communicating Tubes? West European Politics, 33(5), 968–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggetti, M. (2007) De Facto Independence After Delegation: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis. Regulation & Governance, 1(4), 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggetti, M. and Gilardi, F. (2011) The Policy-Making Structure of European Regulatory Networks and the Domestic Adoption of Standards. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 830–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1996) Regulating Europe (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2000) The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. (2003) The Legislative Powers and Impact of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(2), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, R. (2000) ‘Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y. (2010) Accountability and Multi-level Governance: More Accountability, Less Democracy? West European Politics, 33(5), 1030–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, J. and Slominski, P. (2009) Experimentalist but not Accountable Governance? The Role of Frontex in Managing the EU’s External Borders. West European Politics, 32(5), 904–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2003) The Essential Public Manager (Berkshire: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2005) Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A. (2011) Early Conclusion in Bicameral Bargaining: Evidence from the Co-decision Legislative Procedure of the European Union. European Union Politics, 12(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A. and Reh, C. (2013) The Consequences of Concluding Codecision Early: Trilogues and Intra-institutional Bargaining Success. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 1006–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reh, C. Héritier, A., Bressanelli, E. and Koop, C. (2011) The Informal Politics of Legislation: Explaining Secluded Decision Making in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1112–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringquist, E. J. and Eisner, M. A. (2003) Salience, Complexity, and the Legislative Direction of Regulatory Bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storm K. (2000) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37, 261–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (2011) The Creation of European Regulatory Agencies and its Limits: A Comparative Analysis of European Delegation. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 790–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, E. (2008) European Risk Governance: Its Science, its Inclusiveness and its Effectiveness. CONNEX Report Series, 06. D.U.M.M.Y

    Google Scholar 

  • Warntjen, A. (2011) Measuring Salience in EU Legislative Politics. European Union Politics, 13(1), 168–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wonka, A. and Rittberger, B. (2010) Credibility, Complexity and Uncertainty: Explaining the Institutional Independence of 29 EU Agencies. West European Politics, 33(4), 730–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesilkagit, K. and Christensen, J. G. (2009) Institutional Design and Formal Autonomy: Political versus Historical and Cultural Explanations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Nuria Font

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Font, N. (2015). Designing Accountability Regimes at the European Union Level. In: Bianculli, A.C., Fernández-i-Marín, X., Jordana, J. (eds) Accountability and Regulatory Governance. Executive Politics and Governance Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349583_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics