Skip to main content

Abstract

In the summer of 1941, a young graduate student from urban Milwaukee, Wisconsin, named Neal C. Gross, found himself in the rural countryside 50 miles west of Ames, Iowa. Told that farmers began work early in the morning, he got up early enough to ensure that he was standing on the doorstep of the first farmhouse before sunrise. While not familiar with farming, he was familiar with hard work. Gross conducted 21 interviews that first day, averaging 14 per day for the length of the study, accumulating overall a total of 345 personal interviews of Iowa farmers. Showing his ignorance of agrarian subjects, when asked by one farmer how he suggested controlling the noxious weed horse nettles, Gross responded that the farmer should call a veterinarian to look at the sick horse.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and References

  1. E. Rogers (1962) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. M. Rogers, A. Singhal and M. M. Quinlan (2009) ‘Diffusion of Innovation’, in M. B. Salwen (ed.) An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research (Taylor ÔC Francis), pp. 418–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Ryan and N. C. Gross (1943) ‘The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities’, Rural Sociology, 8(1), pp. 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers et al.,’Diffusion of Innovation’.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Rogers and D. Kincaid (1981) Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Wikipedia, ‘Carroll, Iowa’, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CarrolL_Iowa

  7. A. Singhai (2005) ‘Forum: The life and work of Everett Rogers — some personal reflections’, [Electronic Version], Journal of Health Communication, 10, pp. 285–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. M. Beal, E. M. Rogers and J. M. Bohlen (1957) ‘Validity of the Concept of Stages in the Adoption Process’, Rural Sociology, 22(2), pp. 166–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. M. Beal and J. M. Bohlen (1957) The Diffusion Process (Iowa State College: Agricultural Experiment Station).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. A. Moore (2002) Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers (HarperBusiness).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Hale, B. Householder and K. Greene (2003) The Theory of Reasoned Action: Developments in Theory and Practice (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E Davis (1989) ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology’, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Davis, R. Bagozzi and P. Warshaw (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models’, Management Science, 35(8), pp. 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis et al., ‘User acceptance of computer technology’.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davis,’Perceived usefulness’.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. L. Schultz and D. P. Slevin (1973) Implementation and Organizational Validity: An Empirical Investigation (Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic, and Management Sciences, Purdue University).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, ‘Perceived usefulness’.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Sigala et al. (2000) ‘The diffusion and application of multimedia technologies in the tourism and hospitality industries’, in Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2000 (Springer) pp. 396–407.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Chuttur (2009) ‘Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions’, Sprouts Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37) (Indiana University).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. Venkatesh and H. Bala (2008) ‘Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions’, Decision Sciences, 39(2), p. 273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. P. Bagozzi, F. D. Davis and P. R. Warshaw (1992) ‘Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage’, Human Relations, 45(7), pp. 659–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. P. Bagozzi (2007) ‘The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Michael Fisher, Martin Abbott, and Kalle Lyytinen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fisher, M., Abbott, M., Lyytinen, K. (2014). Technological Factors. In: The Power of Customer Misbehavior. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348920_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics