Skip to main content
  • 557 Accesses

Abstract

Some people have thought that there is a power of intuition by which we have a priori knowledge of self-evident moral truths. Bernard Williams in Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy writes of this view:

This model of intuition in ethics has been demolished by a succession of critics, and the ruins of it that remain above ground are not impressive enough to invite much history of what happened to it.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Audi, Robert (1999). ‘Self-Evidence’, in Philosophical Perspectives 13, pp. 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, Robert (2002). ‘Prospects for a Value-Based Intuitionism’, in Philip Stratton-Lake (ed.): Ethical Intuitionism: Re-Evaluation (Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, Robert (2004). The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, Robert (2008). ‘Intuition, Inference, and Rational Disagreement in Ethics’, in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11, pp. 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon (1998). Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, David (2000). Aristotle’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, Michael (2006). ‘A Thoughtful and Reasonable Stability’, in Harry Frankfurt: Taking Ourselves Seriously and Getting it Right. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, Robert (2011). Intuition, Perception and Emotion: A Critical Study of the Prospects for Contemporary Ethical Intuitionism. PhD Dissertation, University of Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaul, Michael R. (1993). Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald (2011). Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, Allan (1999). ‘Morality as Consistency in Living: Korsgaard’s Kantian Lectures’, in Ethics 110, pp. 140–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, Allan (2003). Thinking How to Live Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, W.F.R. (1980). Aristotle’s Ethical Theory, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M. (1981). Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David (1740). A Treatise of Human Nature (many editions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, Susan (1989). Natural Reasons: Personality and Polity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Thomas and Sarah McGrath (2010). ‘Is reflective equilibrium enough?’, in Philosophical Perspectives 24, 325–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre (1970). ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scentific Research Programmes’, in Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge Cambndge University Press 1970), 91–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenman, James (2007). ‘What is Moral Inquiry?’, in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 81, pp. 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenman, James (2009). ‘The Politics of the Self: Stability, Normativity and the Lives We Can Live With Living’, in Lisa Bortolotti (ed.), Philosophy and Happiness. London: Palgrave,, pp. 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenman, James (2010). ‘Humean Constructivism in Moral Theory’, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics 5, pp. 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenman, James (2013). ‘Science, Ethics and Observation’, in Havi Carel and Darian Meacham (eds) Phenomenology and Naturalism, Supplement to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenman, James (Forthcoming) ‘Scepticism about Intuition’ in Timothy Chappell (ed.): Intuition, Theory and Anti-Theory in Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, Charles (1841). Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. London: Richard Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell-Smith, Patrick (1954). Ethics (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha (1986). The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha (1992). Love’s Knowledge; Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1972). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1999). ‘Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics’, in Collected Papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999. pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T.M. (1992). ‘The Aims and Authority of Moral Theory’, in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12, pp. 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T.M. (2003). ‘Rawls on Justification’, in Samuel Freeman (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,, pp. 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, Valerie (2002). ‘Practical Reason and the Stability Standard’, in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5, pp. 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, Valerie (2008). The Reflective Life: Living Wisely With Our Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, Valerie (2012). ‘Open-mindedness and Normative Contingency’ in Oxford Studies in Metaethics 7, pp. 182–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen (1950). The Place of Reason in Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael (1993). Interpretation and Social Criticism (Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, Thalia and Jonathan Haidt (2005). ‘Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe’ in Psychological Science 16, pp, 780–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London: Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 James Lenman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lenman, J. (2015). Moral Inquiry and Mob Psychology. In: Daly, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137344557_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics