Skip to main content

Abstract

We believe in the existence of an objective, mind-independent world — much of which is the way it is regardless of human interests, goals, cognitive/perceptual capacities, and research agendas. There would have been fossils, neutrinos, and curvatures in space-time even if no one had been around to theorize about them; Kepler’s laws would have accurately modeled planetary motion even if no one had realized it. To this extent we are ‘realists’. But we also believe that our concepts of objectivity, mind-independence, and cognate notions are shot through with interests, goals, and similarity standards grounded in provincial facts about ourselves. To this extent we are ‘pragmatists’. Such a package, if not examined too closely, appears incoherent: varieties of pragmatism are often claimed to undermine the very objectivity insisted upon by self-avowed realists. But this appearance is illusory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, D.M. (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism Volume I: Nominalism and Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebee, Helen, Effingham, Nikk, and Goff, Philip (2011). Metaphysics: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon (1984). Spreading the Word. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon (1993). Essays in Qua si-Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon (2013). ‘Pragmatism: All or Some?’, in Huw Price (ed), Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, Robert (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1959). ‘The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language’, reprinted in A. J. Ayer (ed), Logical Positivism. Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1967). ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’, reprinted in Rudolf Carnap (ed), Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter (2010). Objectivity. New York: Zone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr, Cian and Hawthorne, John (2013). ‘Naturalness’, in Karen Bennett and Dean Zimmerman (eds), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 8 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, James (2004). ‘M eta-ethic s and the Problem of Creeping Minimalism’, Philosophical Perspectives 18: 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Kit (2001). ‘The Question of Realism’, Philosophers’ Imprint 1: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert (1977). The Nature of Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert (1986). ‘Moral Explanations of Natural Facts: Can Moral Claims be Tested Against Moral Reality?’, in N. Gillespie (ed), The Southern Journal of Philosophy, suppl. vol. 24: Spindel Conference: Moral Realism: 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert and Jarvis Thomson, Judith (1996). Moral Relativism andMoral Objectivity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, Robert (1990). ‘Varieties of Pragmatism’, Mind 99: 157–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, Robert (1993). ‘Robust Deflationism’, Philosophical Review 102: 247–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, Robert (2010). ‘Universals, Metaphysical Explanations, and Pragmatism’, Journal of Philosophy 107: 590–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, Robert (forthcoming). ‘Three Carnaps on Ontology’, S. Blatti and S. Lapointe (eds), Ontology After Carnap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David K. (1973). Counterfactuals. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David (1983). ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGilvray, Eric (forthcoming). ‘Pragmatism’, in T. Ball (ed), The Cambridge Dictionary of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears, David (1951). ‘Universals’, Philosophical Quarterly I: 218–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, CS. (1878). ‘How to Make Our Ideas Clear’, Popular Science Monthly 12: 286–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Huw (2011). Naturalism without Mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Huw (2013). Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Price, Huw (2015). ‘From Quasi-Realism to Global Expressivism — and Back Again?’, in R. Johnson and M. Smith (eds), Passions and Projections: Themes from the Philosophy of Simon Blackburn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary (1978). Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary (1983). ‘Models and Reality’, in Hilary Putnam, Realism and Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1979). Philosophy and theMirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Mark (2008). Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Mark (2010). Noncognitivism in Ethics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sider, Theodore (2012). Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Roojen, Mark (1996). ‘Expressivism and Irrationality’, Philosophical Review 105: 311–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.R.G. (2010). ‘Fundamental and Derivative Truths’, Mind 119: 103–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.R.G. (2012). ‘Requirements on Reality’, in Fabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder (eds), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael (2013). ‘How Pragmatists can be Local Expressivists’, in Huw Price (ed), Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Crispin (1992). Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Robert Kraut and Kevin Scharp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kraut, R., Scharp, K. (2015). Pragmatism without Idealism. In: Daly, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137344557_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics