Skip to main content

Land Tenure Reforms, Poverty and Natural Resource Management: Conceptual Framework

  • Chapter
Land Tenure Reform in Asia and Africa

Abstract

Land reforms have played a central role in the political economy of many countries in the world and have been subject to massive disagreements between different political interest groups and ideologies. The 20th century included many of the largest social land reform experiments in history, as in the erstwhile Soviet Union and in Eastern Europe, China, Vietnam and Ethiopia. Many of these reforms have since been partly reversed. In other countries with a colonial history, there have been tensions between the property rights established during the colonial period and traditional (customary) land rights; the ways to adapt these to changing conditions have become critical issues. Some countries have had very skewed land distributions rooted in ethnic, colonial and other historical circumstances, and this skew has created demands for land redistribution, both to reduce discrimination and poverty, and to stimulate economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J.A. (2001) ‘The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation’, American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J.A. (2002) ‘Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of Modern World Income Distribution’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 659–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • African Union (2009) ‘Land Policy in Africa: A Framework to Strengthen Land Rights, Enhance Productivity and Secure Livelihoods’, African Union and Economic Commission for Africa, Addis Ababa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anseeuw, W., Bache, W., Bru, T., Giger, M., Lay, J., Messerli, P. and Nolte, K. (2012) ‘Transnational Land Deals for Agriculture in the Global South: Analytical Report Based on the Land Matrix Database’, CDE/CIRAD/GIGA, Bern/Montpellier/ Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arezki, R., Deininger, K. and Selod, H. (2011) ‘What Drives the Global Land Rush’, IMF Working Paper WP/11/251, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandiera, O. (2007) ‘Land Tenure, Investment Incentives, and the Choice of Techniques: Evidence from Nicaragua’, World Bank Economic Review, 21(3), 487–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A. and Iyer, L. (2005) ‘History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India’, American Economic Review, 95(4), 1190–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P.K. (1989) ‘Poverty, Growth, and Rural Labor Markets in India’, Economic and Political Weekly, 24, A21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjaminsen, T.A., Holden, S.T., Lund, C. and Sjaastad, E. (2009) ‘Formalisation of Land Rights: Some Empirical Evidence from Mali, Niger and South Africa’, Land Use Policy, 26, 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (1995) ‘Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Ghana’, Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), 903–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and Ghatak, M. (2010) ‘Property Rights and Economic Development’, in M.R. Rosenzweig and D. Rodrik (eds), Handbook of Economic Development, Vol. 5 (Oxford and Amsterdam: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezabih, M., Holden, S.T. and Mannberg, A. (2012) ‘The Role of Land Certification in Reducing Gender Gaps in Productivity in Rural Ethiopia’, CLTS Working Paper No 9/2012, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, S. (1976) ‘New Relations of Production in Haryana Agriculture’, Economic andPolitical Weekly, 11(13), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H.P., Deininger, K. and Feder, G. (1995) ‘Power, Distortions, Revolt and Reform in Agricultural Land Relations’, Handbook of Development Economics, 3B, 2659–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H.P. and Rosenzweig, M.R. (1986) ‘Behavioural and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture’, Journal of Development Studies, 22, 503–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger-Mkhize, H P., Bourguignon, C. and van den Brink, R. (eds) (2009) Agricultural Land Redistribution: Towards Greater Consensus (Washington D.C.: The World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C. (2007) ‘Property and Constitutional Order: Land Tenure Reform and the Future of the African State’, African Affairs, 106(425), 557–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M.R. and Olinto, P. (2003) ‘Getting Institutions “Right” for Whom? Credit Constraints and the Impact of Property Rights on the Quantity and Composition of Investment’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(1), 173–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantwala, M.L. and Shah, C.H. (1971) Evaluation of Land Reforms, Vol. 1 (Bombay: University of Bombay Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Janvry, A. and Sadoulet, E. (1989) ‘A Study of Resistance to Institutional Change: The Lost Game of Latin American Land Reform’, World Development, 17(9), 1397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, H. (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere else (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. (2003) Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction (Washington D.C.: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., Ali, D. and Alemu, T. (2011a) ‘Impacts of Land Certification on Tenure Security, Investment, and Land Market Participation: Evidence from Ethiopia’, Land Economics, 87(2), 312–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., Ali, D., Holden, S.T and Zevenbergen, J. (2008) ‘Rural Land Certification in Ethiopia: Process, Initial Impact, and Implications for the Other African Countries’, World Development, 36(10), 1786–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., Byerlee, D., Lindsay, J., Norton, A., Selod, H. and Stickler, M. (201lb) Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? (Washington, D.C.: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., Chalamwong, Y., Onchan, T. and Hongladarom, C. (1988) Land Policies and Farm Productivity in Thailand (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenske, J. (2011) ‘Land Tenure and Investment Incentives: Evidence from West Africa’, Journal of Development Economics, 95(1), 137–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, E. and Torero, M. (2006) ‘Do Property Titles Increase Credit Access among the Urban Poor? Evidence from Peru’, Mimeo, Harvard University, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN (2012) Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (Rome: FAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauster, S. and Isakson, R. (2007) ‘Eliminating Market Distortions, Perpetuating Rural Inequity: An Evaluation of Market-assisted Land Reform in Guatemala’, Third World Quarterly, 28(8), 1519–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C.C., Williams, J.T and Ostrom, E. (2005) ‘Local Enforcement and Better Forests’, World Development, 33(2), 273–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. and Udry C. (2008) “The Profits of Power: Land Rights and Agricultural Investment in Ghana’, Journal of Political Economy, 116(6), 980–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. (1993) ‘Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition’, American Economic Review, 83(3), 525–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y., Quisumbing, M.A. and Adriano, L.S. (1990) Toward an Alternative Land Reform Paradigm: A Philippine Perspective (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, R.J. (1983) Land to the Tiller: The Political Economy of Agrarian Reforms in South Asia (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.T., Deininger, K. and Ghebru, H. (2009) ‘Impacts of Low-Cost Land Certification on Investment and Productivity’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 359–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.T., Deininger, K. and Ghebru, H. (2011a) ‘Does Land Registration and Certification Reduce Land Border Disputes?’ CLTS Working Paper No. 5. Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.T., Deininger, K. and Ghebru, H. (2011b) ‘Tenure Insecurity, Gender, Low-cost Land Certification and Land Rental Market Participation’, Journal of Development Studies, 47(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S.T., Otsuka, K. and Place, F. (eds) (2008) The Emergence of Land Markets in Africa: Impacts on Poverty, Equity and Efficiency (Washington D.C.: Resources For the Future Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, L. (2010) ‘Direct Versus Indirect Colonial Rule in India: Long-Term Consequences’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 693–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H.G. and Minten, B. (2007) ‘Is Land Titling in Sub-Saharan Africa Cost-Effective? Evidence from Madagascar’, The World Bank Economic Review, 21(3), 461–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H.G., Li, G.and Rozelle, S. (2002)’Hazards of Expropriation: Tenure Insecurity and Investment in Rural China’, American Economic Review, 92(5), 1420–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khusro, A.M. (1973) The Economics of Land Reform and Farm Size in India (Bombay: Macmillan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladejinsky W. (1977) Agrarian Reform as Unfinished Business: The Selected Papers of Wolf Ladejinsky, edited by L.J. Walinsky (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Libecap, G.D. and Lueck, D. (2011) “The Demarcation of Land and the Role of Coordinating Property Institutions’, Journal of Political Economy, 119(3), 426–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. (2009) Land Reform in Developing Countries: Property Rights and Property Wrongs (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Migot-Adholla, S.E., Place, F. and Oluoch-Kosura, W. (1994) ‘Security of Tenure and Land Productivity in Kenya’, in J.W. Bruce and S.E. Migot-Adholla (eds), Searching for Land Tenure Security in Africa (IA: Kendall Hunt Publ.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Narian, D. and Joshi, P.C. (1969) ‘Magnitude of Agricultural Tenancy’, Economic and Political Weekly, 4, A139-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naritomi, J., Soares, R.R. and Assuncâo, J.J. (2009) ‘Institutional Development and Colonial Heritage within Brazil’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 4276, Institute for the Study of Labor, Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1971) Structure ana Change in Economic History (New York: W.W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, J.B. and Robinson, J.A. (2010) ‘Are Factor Endowments Fate?’ Revista de Historia Economica, 28(1), 45–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Janssen, M.A. and Anderies, J.M. (2007) ‘Going Beyond Panaceas’, PNAS, 104(39), 15176–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka, K. (1991) ‘Determinants and Consequences of Land Reform Implementation in the Philippines’, Journal of Development Economics, 35(2), 339–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka, K. (2010) ‘Efficiency and Equity Effects of Land Markets’, inR.E. Evensonand P. Pingali (eds), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Vol. IV (Amsterdam: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J-P. (1996) “The Evolutionary Theory of Land Rights as Applied to Sub-Saharan Africa: A Critical Assessment’, Development and Change, 27, 29–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powelson, J.P. (1988) The Story of Land: A World History of Land Tenure and Agrarian Reform (MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosterman, R.L. and Riedinger, J.M. (1987) Land Reform and Democratic Development (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. and Ramcharan, R. (2011) ‘Land and Credit: A Study of the Political Economy of Banking in the United States in the Early 20th Century’, The Journal of Finance, 66(6), 1895–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2009) ‘Evaluation in the Practice of Development’, The World Bank Research Observer, 24(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. and van de Walle, D. (2008) Land in Transition. Reform and Poverty in Rural Vietnam (New York and Washington D.C: Palgrave Macmillan and the World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozelle, S. andSwinnenJ.F.M. (2004) ‘Success and Failure of Reform: Insights from the Transition of Agriculture’, Journal of Economic Literature, 42(2), 404–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoneveld, G.C. (2011) ‘The Anatomy of Large-scale Farmland Acquisitions in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Working Paper No. 85, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, E. and Bromley, D. (2000) ‘The Prejudices of Property Rights: On Individualism, Specificity, and Security in Property Regimes’, Development Policy Review, 18(4), 365–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W., Williamson, I., Burns, A., Chung, T.K., Ha, N.T.V and Quyen, H.X. (2007) “The Impact of Land Market Processes on the Poor in Rural Vietnam’, Survey Review, 39(303), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. and Weiss, A. (1981) ‘Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information’, American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, C. (2009) ‘Securing Land and Property Rights in Sub Saharan Africa. The Role of Local Institutions’, Land Use Policy, 26(1), 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsecchi, M. (2010) ‘Land Certification and International Migration: Evidence from Mexico’, Working Papers in Economics No. 440, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warriner, D. (1969) Land Reform in Principle and Practice (London: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Stein T. Holden, Keijiro Otsuka and Klaus Deininger

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holden, S.T., Otsuka, K., Deininger, K. (2013). Land Tenure Reforms, Poverty and Natural Resource Management: Conceptual Framework. In: Holden, S.T., Otsuka, K., Deininger, K. (eds) Land Tenure Reform in Asia and Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343819_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics