Skip to main content

Media Freedom and Independence in Contemporary Democratic Societies

  • Chapter
Media Policies Revisited

Abstract

Since their emergence as means of public communication, both the press and broadcasting have been heralded as important tools for the exercise of freedom of expression and the right to information. This human rights dimension of the media has been intrinsically linked to the recognition of the vital role of the media, especially the news media, for genuine democratic systems, despite variation in systems of democratic governance and theory (Baker, 2002; Trappel, 2011). Citizens, it has been argued, can play an active role in the political process, take advantage of opportunities for political participation and contribute to political dialogue only if they have access to information. By purveying information on public affairs and by providing a space for public debate, the media were seen as key facilitators of participatory decision-making. Also, their potential to prompt the government to be responsive to the people, and, hence, enhance government accountability and transparency has been widely recognised. The media, in other words, have been claimed to be the life-blood of democracy (Fenton, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ECtHR, The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (appl. no. 6538/74), 26 April 1979, para. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ECtHR, Lingens v. Austria (appl. no. 9815/82), 8 July 1986, para. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See ECtHR, Times Newspapers Limited (nos. 1 and 2) v. United Kingdom (appl. nos. 3002/03 and 23676/03), 10 March 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ECtHR, Lingens v. Austria (appl. no. 9815/82), 8 July 1986, para. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ECtHR, Centro Europa 7 s.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy (appl. no. 38433/09), 7 June 2012, para. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ECtHR, Castells v. Spain (appl. no. 11798/85), 23 April 1992, para. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ECtHR, Bladet Troms0 and Stensaas v. Norway (appl. no. 21980/93), 20 May 1999, para. 64; Jersild v. Denmark (appl. no. 15890/89), 23 September 1994, para. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ECtHR, Goodwin v. United Kingdom (appl. no. 7488/90), 27 March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ECtHR, Fuentes Bobo v. Spain (appl. no. 39293/98), 29 February 2000, para. 38; Manole and Others v. Moldova (appl. no. 13936/02), 17 September 2009, para. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ECtHR, Informationsverein Lentia and Others (appl. nos. 13914/88; 15041/89; 15717/89; 15779/89; 17207/90), 24 November 1993, para. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ECtHR, Fressoz and Roire v. France (appl. no. 29183/95), 21 January 1999, para. 54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Evangelia Psychogiopoulou

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Psychogiopoulou, E. (2014). Media Freedom and Independence in Contemporary Democratic Societies. In: Psychogiopoulou, E. (eds) Media Policies Revisited. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137337849_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics