Abstract
Since their emergence as means of public communication, both the press and broadcasting have been heralded as important tools for the exercise of freedom of expression and the right to information. This human rights dimension of the media has been intrinsically linked to the recognition of the vital role of the media, especially the news media, for genuine democratic systems, despite variation in systems of democratic governance and theory (Baker, 2002; Trappel, 2011). Citizens, it has been argued, can play an active role in the political process, take advantage of opportunities for political participation and contribute to political dialogue only if they have access to information. By purveying information on public affairs and by providing a space for public debate, the media were seen as key facilitators of participatory decision-making. Also, their potential to prompt the government to be responsive to the people, and, hence, enhance government accountability and transparency has been widely recognised. The media, in other words, have been claimed to be the life-blood of democracy (Fenton, 2010).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
ECtHR, The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (appl. no. 6538/74), 26 April 1979, para. 65.
ECtHR, Lingens v. Austria (appl. no. 9815/82), 8 July 1986, para. 44.
See ECtHR, Times Newspapers Limited (nos. 1 and 2) v. United Kingdom (appl. nos. 3002/03 and 23676/03), 10 March 2009.
ECtHR, Lingens v. Austria (appl. no. 9815/82), 8 July 1986, para. 41.
ECtHR, Centro Europa 7 s.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy (appl. no. 38433/09), 7 June 2012, para. 131.
ECtHR, Castells v. Spain (appl. no. 11798/85), 23 April 1992, para. 43.
ECtHR, Bladet Troms0 and Stensaas v. Norway (appl. no. 21980/93), 20 May 1999, para. 64; Jersild v. Denmark (appl. no. 15890/89), 23 September 1994, para. 35.
ECtHR, Goodwin v. United Kingdom (appl. no. 7488/90), 27 March 1996.
ECtHR, Fuentes Bobo v. Spain (appl. no. 39293/98), 29 February 2000, para. 38; Manole and Others v. Moldova (appl. no. 13936/02), 17 September 2009, para. 99.
ECtHR, Informationsverein Lentia and Others (appl. nos. 13914/88; 15041/89; 15717/89; 15779/89; 17207/90), 24 November 1993, para. 38.
ECtHR, Fressoz and Roire v. France (appl. no. 29183/95), 21 January 1999, para. 54.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Evangelia Psychogiopoulou
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Psychogiopoulou, E. (2014). Media Freedom and Independence in Contemporary Democratic Societies. In: Psychogiopoulou, E. (eds) Media Policies Revisited. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137337849_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137337849_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46387-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33784-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)